Stop Gandhari's character 'vastraharan' or we will register - Page 2

mr. vikas khatri, your efforts are noble in my view, but, a cople of questions rises in my mind, have you read vyasa's mahabharat or anyother versions of it? or are your views about mahabharat based on the much celebrated televised version made by dr. b.r. chopra?

Originally posted by: VikrantKhatri

There are many interpretations on Mahabharat, but the one which is written by Maharishi Ved Vyas should be considered valid. All I am saying is, makers have to prove what they are showing is as per what Vyas has written. Instead of just a disclaimer they should clearly mention sources they are referring to. Gandhari and Dhritrashtra are made look modern era cuples whmight react in a manner the creatives are potraying.. Atleast we would come to know whether we should follow this Mahabharata or leave it. If makers feel that's how Gandhari reacted then there are more facts they should highlight, one of the many is why Shakuni played catalyst. Makers are just concentraing too much on Draupadi and have manipulated with timings ad stands of others includinPandavas. Atlast, It wasn't Yudhishter, Gandhari cursed Krishna and she said Yadav's too will destroy each other like Krishna made Kauravas and Pandavas fight with each other. If

Originally posted by: VikrantKhatri

There are many interpretations on Mahabharat, but the one which is written by Maharishi Ved Vyas should be considered valid. All I am saying is, makers have to prove what they are showing is as per what Vyas has written. Instead of just a disclaimer they should clearly mention sources they are referring to. Gandhari and Dhritrashtra are made look modern era cuples whmight react in a manner the creatives are potraying.. Atleast we would come to know whether we should follow this Mahabharata or leave it. If makers feel that's how Gandhari reacted then there are more facts they should highlight, one of the many is why Shakuni played catalyst. Makers are just concentraing too much on Draupadi and have manipulated with timings ad stands of others includinPandavas. Atlast, It wasn't Yudhishter, Gandhari cursed Krishna and she said Yadav's too will destroy each other like Krishna made Kauravas and Pandavas fight with each other. If

aww man ... when OP said VH ... i thought he actually meant VH 🤣

All those who questioned this post,why did creative team did not show what Gandhari was shown saying yesterday. Didn't they edit it. This creative team has no idea about facts of Mahabharat and have committed serious mistakes which is proving costly and is turning away those who have read stories on Mahabharat,seen previous versions and feel all the great work done by this team is being let down by poor work on characters such as Vidur,Bheeshma,other Pandavas except Arjun,Karan ad atlast Gandhari in particular. Fact that yesterday's line were edited and not hown today proves someone took case of creatives to ensure there is no back clash.

Originally posted by: Medha.S

Actually, The channel does not claim that they are following Ved Vyas MB.

And exactly what according to you is Ved Vyas MB?

Original sanskrit texts are translated in at least 3 unabridged version in India.

Other two are foreign.

They might be following all translations and different variations and versions, a mix up of KMG, Critical Edition, RM, Cambodian and Indonesian and also others like Jaya, Ajaya, Palace of Illusion and all other novels there are ... and you can't really do anything about it.

Since they do not claim that they strictly follow whatever according to you is original.

The old BRC MB too did not follow it actually so ...

I am impressed by your replies. Few are simply responding without understanding what I am trying to highlight. No one has read Ved Vyas version and it is creative team's responsibility to justify and prove on what basis they are assassinating Gandhari's character. Are they considering natural reaction or there is some base for such a potrayal. I did not claim I have read Maharshi Vyas version,but I have certainly read books on Mahabharat, have heard pravachans on Mahabharat,(Chopras version is also a reliable version if one feels this team is also reliable. All I am trying to say is, this creative team have not justified characters of Bheeshma,Vidur,Karan,Pandavas except Arjun and Gandhari in particular. You read anything related to Mahabharat, you will find consistency and minor deviations in character explanations. No one has manipulated or ignored important characters like this team has. There is major deviation which is turning off viewers. For proof check TRP's

Story, character distortion has been one of the main concern in this forum. We have a special thread too. Where all such views are collected in 1 thread, so they don't get lost.
Feedback to CVs thread- Story distortion#2
Most of us have grown up reading various stories about this epic. We have some idea, know, understand them & do get disappointed when the same is shown in a different manner. It's good to discuss such pts in a constructive mannner. So the original version retains it's sanctity. At least by discussing here many will know the difference between this show's & Scripture's version.

Gandhari is no saint. Finally She is shown in correct light on ⭐️Bharat.
No distortion on her charcter

@bhabuha sadly no one is understanding that she is a human being and more importantly a mother who wanted welfare of her children she is no saint absolutely there is no distortion of her character

@vikrant well there you go, she is just being a nice mom who worries.
And if they had made her shadier all you have to do is study indo and especially kerala mahabharat.
Gandhari was involved in lac house conspiracy and tried to poison a pregnant kunti, taught her children to hate pandavas and what not.
Clearly the makers have not gone in that direction.