Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread #5/ DT's Nt pg 105/149 - Page 37

Originally posted by: nikki1291

the shouts...😊...he must have been feeling left out what with all the grunts by jarasandh and bheem and all...😆😆

👍🏼

Arpit acted well today.👏

I am so behind , I have yet to see the weeks episodes. Great to hear some positive news on Duryodhana's performance.

@rangeeni:must watch episode for you Dury was awesome today

I loved the first half of the episode all thanks to dury and Karna but mostly dury

I felt his humiliation today.Right from the point where he gets out of the water and wears his crown to the point where fire is burning all around them and he swears to insult Panadavs.I could actually see revenge for his humiliation in his eyes

Karna was soo much like the karna i actually like from the epic ever ready to defeat pandavas.Please be like this only

The scene where dury says he wanted to insult pandavs really hurt them with fire burning all around him was really symbolic becuase this same fire of revenge is going to burn the entire kuru clan
Leave aside the logic of how they survived in the fire for so long

second half was boring too much of mamashree drama could have been shorter

Am I the only one who saw hamming??so much so that I am not even going to do an episode analysis today

- I was jealous of Dury's splash... guess I really miss swimming 🤣🤣 StarBheem & Nakul's laufter will cost Draupadi.

I have high doubt abt star karna role in dice game.I think he will protest for his bros and mata kunti ki bahu.akhir khun ka rishta h 😛

We perceive what we are. Dury thought Rajsui was well thought Plot by the Pandavas because that is his nature. As for Karna he thought it was them showing off. Guess he has been hanging around Vrush who thinks that's all Kings do. So, his idea of revenge was showing of his SAMARTH. As for Mamashri he saw the opportunity to PLOT and ceased it.

From reading the rajsuya part I was thinking along similar lines on star Karnas take. I can't grasp the purpose of Rajsuya without inviting this thought.that from its grand scale it was an extravagant affair, a mere show, something superficial about the idea by its very nature/tradition of establishing and asserting a superior position to all subjugated kings.. , furthermore it would have spurned Duryodhans already predisposed hatred n bitterness for pandavas, n much to his chagrin, as he was put in charge of the treasury it couldn't have fared well from his pov n indeed one gleans the low spirit he was in from reading his recounting of time passed @ Indraprasth
I guess the kshatriya way of earning affluence literally means asserting power over.other kingdoms and their wealth, I'm still boggled over by the nature of building an empire.by defeating other kingdoms, but again perhaps that's how it was done, like how wealth is passed on when someone proves their merit through hard work.
How characteristic of them as you pointed out anjana, Karna ever the war-starved warrior refers to physical prowess, whilst mamashree works out a plot turning the disadvantage which is all Duryodhan sees into potential advantage for them in seeking to rob them of their wealth n riches via a dice game where only chance/luck reigns.