All discussions- before-during-after Dice game/VH here only/ DT Nt-128 - Page 45

Originally posted by: TheWatcher

Yes, Karna had his role in Vastraharan but not in ordering Dushy to bring Draupadi forcibly, and he did not tell Draupadi to sit on Dury's thighs.

After Draupadi and Vidur asked some questions to the sabha, Karna told Draupadi to go to the inner chambers, Karna even blamed Yudi and said something, and to that Bhima agreed with Karna. Dont whitewash Karna's character but stop pin pointing everything on Karna.

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ

In today's world we cannot refuse to hire someone for a multitude of reasons including cast, creed, gender etc. But, we can refuse to marry them on those basis. Because marriage is a choice based on one's own assessment, values, preferences, etc. So, even by today's standards Draupadi had every right to reject Karna on the basis of any & every criteria... helmet hair, not hair enough, his daddy's a charioteer, his eyes aren't the right color, he worships the sun, he is friends with Dury, blah blah blah blah.

By the same token Karna even now... defintely now one cannot classify as a courtesan/etc. any woman for being in a committed relationship with five guys. If anything in kali yug that might make her an innocent🤣

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ

In today's world we cannot refuse to hire someone for a multitude of reasons including cast, creed, gender etc. But, we can refuse to marry them on those basis. Because marriage is a choice based on one's own assessment, values, preferences, etc. So, even by today's standards Draupadi had every right to reject Karna on the basis of any & every criteria... helmet hair, not hair enough, his daddy's a charioteer, his eyes aren't the right color, he worships the sun, he is friends with Dury, blah blah blah blah.

By the same token Karna even now... defintely now one cannot classify as a courtesan/etc. any woman for being in a committed relationship with five guys. If anything in kali yug that might make her an innocent🤣

In sum, I DISAGREE that D insulted K. She refused him because he wasn't the cast she wanted to marry into. How is that an insult? 😕 Will I cry if some calls me a brahmin and refuses to marry me?! I might think the person has wierd priorities/thinking and rejected me for silly reason, but that is their personal freedom. I won't take that as an insult.

Originally posted by: TheWatcher

If Draupadi insults its okay, If Karna insults its not okay.

If you can say that Draupadi's action was "somewhat" justified, I can too say that Karna's action was "somewhat" justified, But why to justify both of their insults?, Cant we just say that both the insults were wrong and cannot be justified under any circumstances, I am not in any case trying to justify Karna's action. But in any case if someone tries to justify Draupadi's action (During her Swayamvar), I will too try to justify Karna's action ( Though it is not justifiable). Yes, Karna did instigate Draupadi's vastraharan but people here are trying to pin point everything on Karna, people saying that he ordered Dushy to bring Draupadi, and people are even saying that It was Karna who told Duryodhana to show his thigh to Draupadi.

Originally posted by: TheWatcher

I know that Karna's action was not justified ( i said that in my above post as well ), But that doesn't mean Draupadi's action was justified, yes, Karna did instigate Draupadi's vastraharan but he did not order Dushashan to bring Draupadi, He did not tell Duryodhana to show off his thigh to Draupadi, I want Karna to take the blame for what he did, not for a crime which he didn't even commit.