All discussions- before-during-after Dice game/VH here only/ DT Nt-128 - Page 47

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

I dont expect ⭐️Dushi to be decent enough to stop himself from entering women's chambers on ethical grounds..

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

Poor Vikarna would have missed a chance to carve his name in History 😆.. hope ⭐️Vikarna speaks as well..

Originally posted by: rakshaanra

Karan's only crime is he sided with Dhuryodana
And that is the mother of all sins
Either knowingly or unknowingly

Originally posted by: shani88

Just re-read the spoilers for this week...one sentence that caught my attention...

[quote]On the other hand Draupadi is getting restless in the women's chambers.[/quote]

This "restlessness" from Draupadi is while the dice game is in progress.

My question is - If Draupadi is in the "women's chambers", how on earth did Dushi manage to enter those chambers in the first place? Or is it regular practice for the rajkumars of HP to enter the "women's chambers", for whatever reason (even if it is to drag out "daasis")?

Also, was Draupadi "alone" in the "women's chambers"? I mean, if Kunti or Gandhari were present alongwith her in the chamber, surely they would've stopped Dushi from dragging her out...or not? 😕

Or, is it that the "restlessness" must've "compelled" Drau to come out of the women's chambers just to check out what was happening in the dice hall, and at the same time, Duri must've sent Dushi to bring her - resulting in both Drau & Dushi "meeting" midway, and he dragged her to the dice hall from thereon?

Otherwise, I cannot see how Dushi could've dragged Drau to the dice hall when she was actually present in the "women's chambers"...

Originally posted by: Nandiniraizaada

Vikarna was a good guy right??? I know he stayed with his brother but he did know what's wrong!0???

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

he did one good thing.. 😃 .. he answered Draupadi's question which others were not sure about.. otherwise I dont know much about him to comment..

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

he dint comment on the disrobing part.. he was saying Yudishtra did not have the right to stake Draupadi after losing himself earlier.. this is more of saying Yudi is wrong than saying Dury is wrong.. or may be about both..

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

he dint comment on the disrobing part.. he was saying Yudishtra did not have the right to stake Draupadi after losing himself earlier.. this is more of saying Yudi is wrong than saying Dury is wrong.. or may be about both..