Who was the actual reason for Kurukshetra? - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

62

Views

14.9k

Users

39

Likes

180

Frequent Posters

mythili2 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: Krishnaa_Nair

the person to blame all this is on Sathyawathi...

her chotti si aakhe jo aakash ke ssare taare ko dekhkar Hp ki throne ka dreams dekha!!!! 😡

the rest is in front of us!!!!!

bt the condition was laid by satyawatis father..
CatcherInTheRye thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#12
Brishti i guess niyati was behind this😆
as all this had to happen...kaurvas had to get killed...as much as i know...drith in his last to last to last to last birth😆😆killed 100 kids of swan...(bird)...in the same way he too will witness this..his 100 sons will get killed...😊so pandvas did that karya...
dury wanted all...whole empire...drau was a catalyst...dury took revenge from her ...as she laughed on him ...was this the only reason that dusashan did that???



P.S...no offense
john909 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#13
The very first step was bhishm's promise-- choosing personal duties over the welfare of a whole kingdom.
second reason was duri's ambition, pride and jealousy and dhriti's putraprem over dharma.
third reason were the elders who refused to rise above their promises, gratitude and support what was right. everyone was too busy fulfilling their vows, duties, gratitude.

i respect all of the elders of kuru family as person but when it comes to their duties towards people of hastinapur they all failed miserably.

Draupadi vastraharan was the catalyst and brought the whole family in kurukshetra because no matter what yug it is, everytime a woman has been insulted or not respected enough, there has been a war.


--Royal-- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#14
I think 3 biggest reason of MB war-
First- Bhishm n his useless promise🤢
second- yes non other than Dhrit and his putra moh😡
n last Shakuni.😡

N for Drauapdi Big Nooo..poor draupadi. Pandavas n kauravas ki fight m usko beech m laane ki kya juruart thi...
Edited by -abhi-pundir- - 11 years ago
bunnylovessunny thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#15
It was Lord Krishna. It is all his play.

fatssrilanka thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Elite Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#16
I don't blame Draupadi for the Kurukshetra war.She was just a catalyst. The main reason was Draupadi's vastraharan and Dhrithrashtra's putra moh which led to this massacre.If he had pulled the string on his arrogant son the day he started troubling Pandavas this wouldn't have happened.He never wanted or should I say chose to turn a blind eye to all of Duryodhan's cunning ways thanks to the manipulative Shakuni.
Ketan_ thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#17
Seed of Mahabharata were bore when Yayati made Puru his yuvraj instead of Yadu. Puru founded the kuruvansh and Yadu founded the Yaduvansh. Yadu was the rightful heir of that throne. And in the end, Kunti was the daughter of Shurshena who was a yaduvanshi.. Arjuna was her son from devraj Indra and Vasudev was brother of Kunti who's daughter was Subhadra.
So their son Abhimanyu was a Yaduvansi in true sense and his descendants became ruler of that sacred land after him. The throne got its rightful heir after 30 generation, everything in between and everyone in between were just a catalyst to it. War was inevitable from the very beginning, even before any of the war participant was born.
Edited by ketan_jha - 11 years ago
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#18
The Ancestors of the Kuru and Yadu race if you really want to pinpoint the culprit.
Another family feud, between Father and Sons, Yeyeti, Puru,Yadu.
You could also blame the mother of Yadu, shukracharyas daughter.
After the war ended, who became the King?
Yudhishtira and then?
Abhimanyus Son, Parikshit.
Yudhishtira was Kuntis biological child, a Yadu by blood.

Parikshit was not related to the Kurus by blood either since his Grandfathers, the Pandavas were not Kuru by blood. But, Abhimanyus Paternal grandmother, Kunti and Mother, Subhadra both were Yadus.

In the end it was how it should have been from the start.

No Kuru could be the King, since there Founder, Puru was not the one who should have been the King, it was Yadus right.
Since their Father gave Puru the throne instead of Yadu.
It only is Karma, that in the end a Yadu descendent was the King.

TheWatcher thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#19
If we look at Mahabharata almost everyone can be held directly responsible, Here are a few main culprits.

Duryodhana - If one wants to blame only one person for Kurekshetra it has to be duryodhana, he was always jealous of his cousins and thus his jealousy led to the war.

Bhishma - The person who started the saga, It was his OATH which made him helpless against Duryodhan's crimes, If he ever resisted from Dury's crimes Dury wouldnt have done it all.

Karna
- He was the strength of Duryodhan, Dury never trusted Drona or Bhishma to finish the war, He only trusted Karna to finish the war, If Karna ever said that he wont fight a war Dury wouldnt have waged a war.

Shakuni
- The guy who poisoned the mind of Duryodhan from the very start.

Dritharstra-Gandhari - One was blind due to a stupid OATH, and the another one was blind in his sons love.

Kunti - If she would have accepted Karna when he came at hastinapur and let him be friends with Dury the whole war would have averted because Dury wouldnt have waged a war without Karna

Krishna
- The person who could kill Duryodhan with his sudarshan to avoid a million deaths.

Pandavas - They should have protested while the Dury was ordering to strip draupadi, They should have protested atleast a little bit or stop Yudi from gambling their wife

Almost every central character can be somewhere held directly responsible for Kurekshetra.

john909 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#20
people who consider krishna a reason behind kurukshetra just coz he didnt kill all the adharmis himself havent understood the message behind mahabharat or reasons behind krishna's actions.
there is one thing about mankind that has stayed constant since the dawn of time. mankind tends to make mistakes learn from it, remember it for a while and then forget it and they make the same mistakes again, the cycle keeps on going. so if God comes to earth and start solving every little problem of mankind what is mankind for? people will forget the meaning of word karma.
Edited by john909 - 11 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".