Who killed Abhimanyu? - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

39

Views

58.2k

Users

21

Likes

114

Frequent Posters

butterturnips thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: .Vrish.




There was no Jayadrath anywhere near Abhimanyu. When Abhimanyu was killed, Dushashan & a whole bunch of Kauravas danced around the body. Similar to what they had done on day 1 to Sveta. Bhima returned the favor when he killed Dushashan

In BRC, what they showed - Duryodhan throwing flowers @ Abhimanyu's feet - was pure fiction, nothing more, nothing less.


Dancing around the body is not mentioned in the original text. Nothing as such happened. This is mentioned in the later additional text. The scholars have added more spice in Abhimanyu's death-story.
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#22
Oh another discussion on Abhimanyu..
Why Arjuna picked Jayadratha? this is what I think.. Because he knew the actual men behind were Yudishtar his Brother & Drona his Guru.. he respects and loves them both.. Killing them is no question at all..

Killing others may be he felt were difficult, time consuming, or killing them was part of someone else's vow..

So he picked Jayadratha instead to instantly vent his rage.. to his bad luck it did not happen instantly..
Edited by Ddiala - 11 years ago
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#23

Originally posted by: candidfrisky

Dancing around the body is not mentioned in the original text. Nothing as such happened. This is mentioned in the later additional text. The scholars have added more spice in Abhimanyu's death-story.


Actually, this is what it says, in the same chapter that describes Abhimanyu's killing, linked last page

"Beholding Abhimanyu, resplendent as the sun or the moon, lying on the ground, thy troops were in transport of joy, while Pandavas were filled with grief.


The ACK described the Kauravas as dancing, and that seems to be a fair translation of what 'transport of joy' means.

Originally posted by: Ddiala

Oh another discussion on Abhimanyu..

Why Arjuna picked Jayadratha? this is what I think.. Because he knew the actual men behind were Yudishtar his Brother & Drona his Guru.. he respects and loves them both.. Killing them is no question at all..

Killing others may be he felt were difficult, time consuming, or killing them was part of someone else's vow..

So he picked Jayadratha instead to instantly vent his rage.. to his bad luck it did not happen instantly..



Killing Yudisthir was out of the question, but killing Dronacharya was certainly okay. Same w/ Dushashan's son - you can bet that Arjun wasn't sentimental about him being his nephew. Yeah, killing Drona was Dhrishtadyumna's role, but there was nothing stopping Arjun from, say, engaging Drona while Dhrishtadyumna killed him from behind.

And nobody had taken a vow to slay Dushashan's son. I think he may have been ultimately killed by either Bhima, or one of Draupadi's sons, not sure whom, or on which day.
Atiratha2.0 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#24

Originally posted by: .Vrish.




No, it was the Shamshaptakas - Krishna's army gift to Duryodhan - who distracted Arjun by challenging him.

Jayadrath's role in this was that after Abhimanyu had penetrated the formation, Jayadrath quickly plugged it again to prevent any further leakage of the enemy into the Kaurava ranks. The boon that Shiva had given him was that on a day, he'd defeat the 4 of the Pandavas, excluding Arjun, but he would still die @ Arjun's hands. That went into effect that day, and whereas normally, Jayadrath was a mediocre warrior, that day, he blocked not only the Pandavas, but everyone else - Satyaki, Drupada, Virata, Dhrishtadyumna, Ghatotkacha and so on.

Abhimanyu was deceptively disarmed by Karna breaking his bow from behind, Drona breaking the reins of his chariot & killing Sumitra, his charioteer. Then they broke his sword, shield and chariot, and there was that famous scene of him defending himself w/ just his chariot wheel. That too was broken.

From this point, most serials get it wrong. Even BRC and RS-SK showed Karna killing him, but that's not what happened. Abhimanyu next picked up his mace, and Dushashan's son attacked him w/ his mace. Now, thisone was a fair 1:1 combat. Both of them fell unconscious after a while. Shrutakarna was the first to recover, whereas Abhimanyu, being exhausted, took more time. Here is where Shrutakarna cheated - instead of waiting for Abhimanyu to get up, he brought his mace down on Abhimanyu's head while he was still unconscious, slaying him.

If anyone ought to have been hunted down for Abhimanyu's killing, it should have been first Drona, and then Shrutakarna.



I think the Samsaptakas were actually the Trigarthas. Krishna's army is Narayani Sena, isn't it?
Samsaptakhas is somekind of oath between trigarthas brothers to fight arjun to death (if im not mistaken)
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#25
The Narayanis only were the Shamshaptakas. The Trigartha princes were killed throughout the war, and Susharma was the last major Kaurava warrior to be slain by Arjun - the same time that Bhima killed Sudarshan & Sahadev Ulooka & Shakuni.
Atiratha2.0 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

The Narayanis only were the Shamshaptakas. The Trigartha princes were killed throughout the war, and Susharma was the last major Kaurava warrior to be slain by Arjun - the same time that Bhima killed Sudarshan & Sahadev Ulooka & Shakuni.


Here, bro..look at the KMG's foot note
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m14/m14074.htm

128:1 It will be remembered that the Samsaptaka host which had engaged Arjuna for several days on the field of Kurukshetra, all consisted of Trigarta warriors led by their king Susarman, Samsaptaka means 'sworn'. Those soldiers who took the oath that they would either conquer or die, wore called by that name.



Or here, The Samsaptakas
"Samsaptaka means 'sworn warrior'. They were the bravest of the Trigartas, who, led by their King Susarman, had sworn an oath to either kill Arjuna or die in that attempt. After swearing their oaths, they performed their own funeral rites, for they well knew that their chances of victory were slim, and that death was almost a certainty."
Edited by Atiratha2.0 - 11 years ago
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Killing Yudisthir was out of the question, but killing Dronacharya was certainly okay. Same w/ Dushashan's son - you can bet that Arjun wasn't sentimental about him being his nephew. Yeah, killing Drona was Dhrishtadyumna's role, but there was nothing stopping Arjun from, say, engaging Drona while Dhrishtadyumna killed him from behind.

And nobody had taken a vow to slay Dushashan's son. I think he may have been ultimately killed by either Bhima, or one of Draupadi's sons, not sure whom, or on which day.


my assumption was based on that might not have had any time to understand what happened inside the vyuha.. So overall it was Yudishtar, Drona and Jayadrath.. Karna, Dury, Dushi were obvious names in the list which have to kept for later..
gowri122 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#28
as far as i know, dushasan's son killed abhimanyu in a mace fight inside the chakravyuha. it was jayadratha who prevented the 4 pandavas from entering the vyuh & thereby trapping abhi inside. actually jayadratha had got a boon from Mahadev that he vil be able to beat pandavas 1ce except arjuna. he got the boon after he tried to abduct draupadi. as per the order of drona, karna cut his now & broke his chariot. then y didn't arjuna pledged to kill drona ??? abhi went in willingly even though he did not knew how to get out. he was killed in a 1 on 1 mace fight with durmashan.
Atiratha2.0 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#29
Ddiala was right, maybe from pandavas point of view, Jayadhrat was the closest and the last person responsible as they cant see what's inside the chakravyuh..
But overall he almost had nothing to do with it, he just playing his part to keep the formation, rearranged it after it was breached (by abhimanyu).. Why blame him?
What's so good about a FORMATION if one enemy approaching, they have to send a warrior ONE BY ONE to fight him fairly!? The basic point of a formation is to STAY TOGETHER in CERTAIN ORDER! Why expect them to break up?

One more step backward u could blame the trigartas who challenged Arjun! Or even yudishthir!
Why blame anyone by the way? Didnt arjun kill other people's SON or husband or father everyday?
Cotswolds thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#30

Originally posted by: SamVam786

So please stop unnecessarily criticising Arjuna everytime on public domain & stop giving sympathy votes to Karna!

Jai Hind..
satsriyakal..😉😊

👏👏👏⭐️
Superb post. You should create a separate thread for this. I agree with you 100%.
The superiority between Karna, Arjun, Bhishma and Drona is a perennial fodder for all forums. Your research must be commended and logic is undeniable.
I personally like Karna but dont like playing down Arjuna to give Karna few brownie points. Lot of people cite Mrityunjaya from Shivaji Sawant as a gospel truth on this. Sawantji, although great researcher is still primarily story teller and dramatised Karna and justified him in every instance to make a superhero out of him.
Everyone seems to think that Karna is unlucky, tragic hero being denied his rights. But actually Pandavas faced untold miseries and hardships. Always at receiving end of DUry's schemes starting from uncountable insults to Lakshagraha to Draupadi disrobing to exile in forest. Pandavas faced all while Karna was still enjoying his kingdom and favours from Duri.
As pointed out, Arjuna was distraught when learnt about true identity of Karna, his arch enemy and was angry with Lord Krishna while Karna still could not let go of his vanity. It is credit to him that he did not reveal his identity to Dury because he was sure that righteous Pandavas will simply follow Karna and abdicate claim to kingdom.. but it also throws blazing light on Pandavas dharma.
Anyway.. I think this discussion should be in a separate thread. This thread is for different purpose.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".