Feedback to CVs thread- Story distortion#1

First Previous

Page

116

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#561

Originally posted by: medha00
Younger generation( which includes me) is not dumb.We know better than to believe the exact things being showed on entertainment tele.If a yuth is interested enough in mb or hindu myhology then we are more than just capable enough to do our own research with books and internet to know our mytho and history, those who are truly stupid would sit in front of their tele. And watch mb to know it.
Kindly stop making the younger generation of india look like brainless morons. 😆

ya i agree no one should think they can understand mythology by just seeing TV

i mean i see other mythological or historical serials as well but i dont take everything on face value whatever i see i read about it to understand it more

But its also the truth that many people do look for easier ways .You know like people who arent intrested in reading or found of reading but would still like to know about this epic would find it easier to just see it on TV and know the story i am saying this becuase there are many people like that even i know them.In any case hopefully by now they should know that many things in this serial are ficitonal

Edited by Sabhayata - 11 years ago

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#562

Originally posted by: medha00
If cvs will ever read this(which i seriously doubt) give drupada some space. He wasnt some sadist and loved draupadi fine.
It is idiocy to show someone who will be fighting at the side of lord krishna as some rishi-killing maniac.
Cut out the excess laughter of shakuni and bheem too.
Give dushi jaan more screen time, dont just make him stand there beside duri jaan like an evil laughing clown and giving creepy looks.
Everything else is almost fine.Just cut out the tears.It is annoying.

agree with he bold part shakuni's laugh goes with his character but Bheem's laugh is so out of character and awkward he actually looks like a mad man.I cant believe CV's dont realize this if some portion of an actor's acting is not looking good on him then they need to cut it out.For example i like shaheer's laugh it looks very natural but actor playing Bheem's laugh is very unnatural CV's need to stop showing that

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

guenhwyvar

@guenhwyvar

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#563

Originally posted by: medha00
Younger generation( which includes me) is not dumb.We know better than to believe the exact things being showed on entertainment tele.If a yuth is interested enough in mb or hindu myhology then we are more than just capable enough to do our own research with books and internet to know our mytho and history, those who are truly stupid would sit in front of their tele. And watch mb to know it.
Kindly stop making the younger generation of india look like brainless morons. 😆

too late...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padmavyuha#The_thirteenth_day_of_Mahabharata_War

(the last few sentences in that section)

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#564

Originally posted by: spatel23

too late...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padmavyuha#The_thirteenth_day_of_Mahabharata_War

(the last few sentences in that section)

🤣

hey Bhagwaan yeh kya hai log sach mein is MB pe believe karte hain

wiki shouldnt allow updates until a reliable source is given

Quote

Medha.S

@Medha.S

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#565

Wiki is not a "reliable source" to understand ancient history or mytho guys. 😆
And as i said we are fully capable of doing our own bloody research on it if we really are interested in it.
And the ones who would rather watch starplus to know mb or lifeok to know about lord shiva than do their own digging and hunting around, then they are truly stupid.
The excuse that i dont like reading but am interested in mb, so i sit in front of my tele for half an hour to know it, is not a bloody valid one.

Quote

halfbloodprince

@Wistfulness

Achiever

+ 8

Posted: 11 years ago

#566

Wikipedia - The free misleading encyclopedia

Quote

guenhwyvar

@guenhwyvar

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#567

Originally posted by: medha00
Wiki is not a "reliable source" to understand ancient history or mytho guys. 😆
And as i said we are fully capable of doing our own bloody research on it if we really are interested in it.
And the ones who would rather watch starplus to know mb or lifeok to know about lord shiva than do their own digging and hunting around, then they are truly stupid.
The excuse that i dont like reading but am interested in mb, so i sit in front of my tele for half an hour to know it, is not a bloody valid one.

true, very true. But in this rapid age of technology and lack of time, wikipedia is where most people go for information. It's a sad but true fact, and only a handful of people who have studied properly know that Wikipedia is far from a reliable source.

But for the vast majority, Wikipedia is an excellent source to get basic summaries on concepts.

Interestingly, I don't think Ekta Kapoor's MB had any such effects (of course EK's MB was far below the worst thing watchable), but I think it's amazing how much TV has an influence over an individual. I remember, back when the NDTV Ramayana serials were televised, I was reading comments everywhere that was like "whenever I am worshiping God, I think about Debina and Gurmeet's faces as Sita and Rama" ... which, if one is religious, a pretty stupid thing to do. That being said, televising the Ramayana or MB isn't a bad thing, but it has to be done with some degree of devotion towards the epics, towards the message, and towards the ideas present in the epics.

Now, are people just gullible or does this have something to do with our faith in our religion (assuming most people here are Hindus)? Is it exploitation (since mythology is definitely an attention grabber) or does the fault lie in us?

(those are completely off topic questions, so no need to change the discussion towards them. Just expressing my thoughts)

But I'm happy they are introducing Ghatotkach somewhat soon (probably next week?). Wonder how this will happen though.

Edited by spatel23 - 11 years ago

Quote

Medha.S

@Medha.S

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#568

Huh?Maybe they are just shooting for ghatokatch now?
😆

I mean wont it be biologicaly impossible to have bheems son in a week when bheems 1st wife hasnt been introduced and would probably be introduced next week too parallel to the krishna-draupadi milan.
i was wondering if that is not ghatokatch but his mama hidimba.
and if it is ghatokatch so was he born like draupadi too?came out breaking the ground?
was he even going to be bheems son? 😆