Why is everyone shown to be so black and white and not grey? - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

55

Views

6.5k

Users

20

Likes

193

Frequent Posters

rasyafan thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#11
The makers of this new Mahabharat failed to understand the Epic Mahabharat it is quite clear from the characterization of each character of Mahabharat. Look at Dronacharya for example what they have reduced him to be. Dronacharya was dignified, calm, wise, and focused at the same time he was shrewd, clever, unlike This Dronacharya whose only attribute seems to be is cunning, selfish and acts like a house wife 😆😆 and cruel.
whitewitch thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

Manojie

How as duryodhan generous can you tell me one incident in which he was generous as per the MB book becuase i certainly dont remember?


What were the good qualities that Duryodhan had as per the MB book where he did good for some one else can some one enlighten me?Even when he made Karn the king it was only beucase he wanted him as a competition for Arjun later on he did love him asa friend but not in the begining?Tell me one good or self less act of Duryodhan?


My POV is as per MB book Duryodhan is not a grey shaded character he is a villian and a black character.Grey shaded character are Dhridhrashtra and Karna not Duryodhan.


yes i too agree kauravas were not saints but again pandavas were not completly blamesless
in first mb duryodan often called suyodhan too
he fought for something he thought his only
and shakuni boosted his ego
in the end when he makes ashwathma as his senapati he says
pandavas only won kingdom only after his death not when he is alive.he lived as king and died as king
which is true.
duroyadan and his brothers were always sidelined ddue to gratness of pandavas
so be pandavas be grest and kauravas be bad.
every character has it is own interpertation

he suported karna when all others insulted him.
it was not a necessity for him
but he did
haha67re thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#13
I like this series but yes at times I disagree with the portrayals of some of the characters .I also hate this part in Indian tv generally people are put in black and white and thus many a time characters are butchered.

I will start with Duryodhna...Probably we all see him as villain of Mahabharata...Currently we can see the actor portraying the role smirking,making faces a lot as if he is scheming each moment...
Duryodhna was someone who considered himself as the right owner of the throne..In his mind he was not trying to snatch something which belonged to Pandavas...So he should be shown in more humane ways .One +ve quality would be he revolted against caste system.Again here they might portray in the show that he did it for throne but actually Karna was very dear to him.He lamented on his death in a way which he didnt do even for his brothers...

Similarly Madri,Asawathama,Satyavati were not -ve characters.

I am a big fan of Arjuna..Never thought I would write something against him...But yes the promo(Arjun) is not promising..Arjun stands tall automatically in epic ..they don't have to demean other Pandavas...I hope it is just promo and they give proper due to each of them in serial.


The specialty of Mahabharata is that you can like and justify any character as per your point of view...So vulnerabilities ,weakness and strength of each character should be shown properly and should not be just put in two categories of +ve and -ve




Infofan thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#14
@ TM - very valid point. I find that the channel has a tendency to show their characters all white or black in most shows I have watched on SP. They seem to have trouble with grey!!!


It changes the feel of the story.


Manojie thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

Manojie

How as duryodhan generous can you tell me one incident in which he was generous as per the MB book becuase i certainly dont remember?
What were the good qualities that Duryodhan had as per the MB book where he did good for some one else can some one enlighten me?Even when he made Karn the king it was only beucase he wanted him as a competition for Arjun later on he did love him as a friend but not in the begining?Tell me one good or self less act of Duryodhan?
My POV is as per MB book Duryodhan is not a grey shaded character he is a villian and a black character.Grey shaded character are Dhridhrashtra and Karna not Duryodhan.



I think you're right, all of his "generosity" was percieved as such by people. In reality he was BUYING people's emotions. He bought Karna to side with him. He gave "donations" to buy people's support.


Sabhayata thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#16
Haha67
Duryodhan never revolted against the caste system he intially supported karan becuase he wanted some one as good as Arjun in his team that is not something wrong being shown it was like that.Only after he came to really love him as a friend
Whitewitch
I am not saying pandavas were saints of course they made mistakes but they did a lot of good acts as well.So when we are talking about kauravas or duryodhan being a grey shaded character i am asking again what are the good acts done by him.I am asking this again and again yet people claiming that Duryodhan is a grey shaded character cant come up with one good act of his just one good or selfless act.They are showing in the serial taht Duryodhan is being manipulated by Shakuni arent they?I again say if he is a grey shaded character what are his good qualities or acts just name one
He isnt a villian becuase he is fighting for what he believs is his right is becuase of the means he choses.Killing a young child bheem even if i discard this as shakuni's manipulation what about trying to kill pandavas in lakshagarah he wasnt achild then.or about giving them a barren land to rule which was unfair or insulting druapadi or even towards the end being so egoistic that he refused to even give 5 villages.All these happened when he was an adult shakuni or shakuni as an adult if you make mistakes you need to take blame for that.I again say name one good act or quality of Duryodhan that has been shown in the MB book
Edited by Sabhayata - 11 years ago
Wistfulness thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Banner Contest Winner Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 11 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: CherryPrincess

In the original epic, characters like Duryodhan, Aswathama, Dushashan, Satyawati, etc. were shown to be grey (more black than white), but in this interpretation of Mahabharat, CVs are clearly differentiating them by making them seem like pure evil. I am in no way saying here that these characters were good, and did no wrong. But in those times, they didn't use such explicitly negative language like Duryodhan in this series. Duryodhan's face is always shown with negative evil expressions.

Instead if they showed him in greyish black light, it would seem more real. He was obsessed about being King because of his father's and Shakuni's influence. But, he wasn't on the extreme category of evil like Ghori. I don't respect him nor his actions, but seeing the story as it really was, would feel better.


Does anyone here agree with me?

I agree with you! The portrayal of characters is a big disappointment and don't think they are going to improve in future.

These makers have completely failed in portraying the grey side and that's the supreme drawback.
panchaali thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#18
Yes I do agree with you CherryPrincess ..

About Duryodhan, what I have learnt from my childhood was, that he had some negative qualities..like pride and ego and he lacked intelligence and was totally driven by emotions..

that is why he easily got influenced by shakuni and find out a wrong meaning of his father's dream and his ego , emotion made him do many wrong things and evil person would take no such steps, he would attack from back, duryodhan was not like that..

A completey evil person, has an evil brain and which is full with polittical wits which always thinks about gaining..

If Duryodhan was like that then why would he accept Karn as his best friend!!!




Edited by panchaali - 11 years ago
582445 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#19
@Sabhayata
okk though it is clear Dury loved Karna as his real friend but initially it may be was for his own selfish reason but think in the society of those days when Cast-ism was quite strong his one bold step of declaring Karna king n making him a friend cud create and did cause hatred and anger towards him that too of strongest people of society i.e. Bramhan n Khatriya sreni of society .. he risked his own image with it .. now Vyas dev was a huge supporter of Brahman empowerment [over Kshatriya in politics so naturally he don't even count a Sutaputra] .. I found it a enough big reason of portraying Dury as so called villain of Mahabharat .. though it is just one of the reasons I m saying so .. ds is not even the main reason

2nd d show portrayed him tricky where Dury was a man of dumb head, big heart miserably misguided by a man with motive from his childhood .. he was no way a man who could trick

3. he was a good king affectionate towards his subjects .. people of Hastinapur cursed Pandavas n Draupadi for the battle of Kurukshetra .. that indeed a proof of Dury being an efficient king

4. if you see unbiasedly you will Kauravas used less mean tricks than Pandavas n Krishna used in battle .. all the tricks before battle was initiated by Shakuni .. Dury believed his mamashri blindly .. it was his mistake but that can't be a sin .. in battle he fought with honor .. following the norms using no Shikhandi, Ghatotjkach for saving himself or he never killed a man struggling with his chariot .. so if u call pandavas good then Dury is nowhere evil .. logically
Edited by SayaneeH.Lecter - 11 years ago
_BacknForth_ thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#20
I agree. Mahabharat is all about the grey-ness as per me. There are reasons (if not justified) for everyone and everything.
They are making it all so over dramatic!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".