was dhritrashtra actually so bad

Shilpi77

@Shilpi77

Voyager

17

Posted: 11 years ago

#1

i think in actual he wanted to be the king but was not so cruel and rude... i like the actor who plays dhritrashtra he reaaly acts as if he is blind... i love his act... super👏

6

Reply

Quote

BLR_babe

@BLR_babe

Rocker

26

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#2

dhirt was blind by putr prem .. he was not cruel in any sense but when it came his sons he could not look beyond them .. thts what they r trying to show but in very soap opera mode 😆

5

Reply

Quote

Shilpi77

@Shilpi77

Voyager

17

Posted: 11 years ago

#3

Originally posted by: BlrBabe
dhirt was blind by putr prem .. he was not cruel in any sense but when it came his sons he could not look beyond them .. thts what they r trying to show but in very soap opera mode 😆

yes maybe u are right

Reply

Quote

Janki75

@Janki75

Inactive

5

Posted: 11 years ago

#4

He was not cruel- just wanted what he thought should have been his and his sons. He was born blind but all his life thought he would be King. Then Pandu became King. He felt jealous ( as siblings do ) then when he got married- there was Sakuni poising his thinking.

Sakuni's influence nursed his insecurities. His children were influenced hence the family problems.

3

Reply

Quote

halfbloodprince

@Wistfulness

Achiever

46

+ 8

Posted: 11 years ago

#5

No he wasn't cruel or bad the way he's being portrayed.

But yes he was blind in his 'Putra-moh' which became the kingdom's curse.

5

Reply

Quote

Manoj

@Manojie

Voyager

17

Posted: 11 years ago

#6

Dhiritashtra knew about the plot to kill the Pandavas in the House of Lac. So yes Dhiritashtra was evil by then...

4

Reply

Quote

Poulomi Das

@_Poulomi_

Stunner

38

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#7

He was basically a biased man, and in a lot of dilemma, whether to choose his sons or to stick to the duties of a king... yes, he was easily swayed, and poor judgement over people's intentions, or look though a person... sadly, and quite ironically, he was truly blind, not just physically. They way he is portrayed is just OTT. I cant imagine why would they show him in such poor light? To show his failure as a king and a father?

1

Reply

Quote

Shilpi77

@Shilpi77

Voyager

17

Posted: 11 years ago

#8

Originally posted by: poulomi12
He was basically a biased man, and in a lot of dilemma, whether to choose his sons or to stick to the duties of a king... yes, he was easily swayed, and poor judgement over people's intentions, or look though a person... sadly, and quite ironically, he was truly blind, not just physically. They way he is portrayed is just OTT. I cant imagine why would they show him in such poor light? To show his failure as a king and a father?

yes with what its been shown in the show is that he was a very poor king and a father and very bad husband too...

1

Reply

Quote

Shilpi77

@Shilpi77

Voyager

17

Posted: 11 years ago

#9

but i again repeat the person who plays the character is doing a very good job...

Reply