I think CVs answered some of u all - Page 6

Originally posted by: Shazzie

[

Thanks for posting this link!

This is that first wife is recogonized but NOT that the 2nd marriage is void or kids from 2nd marriage are illegitimate! Moreover wife gets recognition from husband!

Also, pls read the last para.

On the basis of photographs and statements of the people who claimed to have attended their marriage in 1984, the Commission had prima facie found Jha's claim to be true.

On the basis of photographs & eye witnesses statements! Here there was only one witness.

Originally posted by: Shazzie

Thanks for posting this link!

This is that first wife is recogonized but NOT that the 2nd marriage is void or kids from 2nd marriage are illegitimate! Moreover wife gets recognition from husband!

Also, pls read the last para.

On the basis of photographs and statements of the people who claimed to have attended their marriage in 1984, the Commission had prima facie found Jha's claim to be true.

On the basis of photographs & eye witnesses statements! Here there was only one witness.

Originally posted by: _charu_

lets cut the crap short Shazzie , itne long explanation ki zaroorat hi nahi hai...till the time the first wife FILES A BIGAMY CASE against her husband and WINS the case, the second marriage DOES NOT stand VOID, so therez no question of illegitimacy...if the first wife Meera files a case NOW, it's of no use as the person concerned is DEAD...so they can no way call RK as illegitimate..MAX. Bhai can do is to CLAIM a PART of MK's property (IF AT ALL, there is any property in his name currently), AFTER proving HIS legitimacy in court AND proving that MK married Meera...and marriage means it should fulfill the criteria of a proper marriage with minimum 3 witnesses..

Originally posted by: _charu_

Exactly charu!! This is only possible when the person involved is alive! Person claiming to be wife has to file the case in court and PROVE that she is right. And if she wins the case, then she is recognized. But its ONLY N ONLY IF THE PERSON INVOLVED IS ALIVE!

Just by publishing a photo in the newspaper doesnot give any tom-dick-harry the legal right to claim that he is son of any person or he has the right to use the surname.

Originally posted by: Shazzie

Exactly charu!! This is only possible when the person involved is alive! Person claiming to be wife has to file the case in court and PROVE that she is right. And if she wins the case, then she is recognized. But its ONLY N ONLY IF THE PERSON INVOLVED IS ALIVE!

Just by publishing a photo in the newspaper doesnot give any tom-dick-harry the legal right to claim that he is son of any person or he has the right to use the surname.

Originally posted by: likarsh

Did you not read what I wrote. It was regarding the rights of the first wife. And yes, I read the last sentence too. There is a photograph and one witness. And also perhaps a priest. That is enough. Oh, technicalities of three witnesses, for those times, a photograph and enough witnesses and also people who knew of their affair would be enough. You know what would also be enough? Eye witnesses that Rashid talked about, who told him how she was pregnant and MK took away her son. 😆😆😆

As for illegitimate, officially there is no such thing as illegitimate now. All children are entitled. But socially--socially, it is a different story.😆

Originally posted by: likarsh

[

You forget that Mohan Kundra also committed a few CRIMES other than leaving Meera, to which there were eyewitnesses. Sultan is acting on behalf of Meera. Sure he didn't go through courts, but since people love talking about what's recognized in society (that Radha-MK was recognized in society). Meera is now being recognized in society as Mohan's FIRST WIFE.😆😆

Sultan gets Meera the recognition as first wife without going through the courts. What now, it's now in public domain and knowledge. So now, Sultan doesn't need to go to the courts. It's all over the media and the public. And RK and family will eventually be forced to accept it publicly. That's what Sultan wants: RECOGNITION for Meera.

Originally posted by: Shazzie

[

I read what you wrote! guess you yourself didnot read the article. All this is only possible if MK had been alive. As the case in this article, the person who CLAIMS to be first wife HAS TO PROVE to court legally. Only after court accepts the statements/proofs given,then only the the person will get the recognition of first wife!

Originally posted by: Shazzie

I read what you wrote! guess you yourself didnot read the article. All this is only possible if MK had been alive. As the case in this article, the person who CLAIMS to be first wife HAS TO PROVE to court legally. Only after court accepts the statements/proofs given,then only the the person will get the recognition of first wife!