Diction: poorly credited yet so effective

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

601348

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

#41

well Madhu doesnt speak much so i didnt notice her dialogs or way of speaking much 😛😆

whereas RK is always like chatar patar with his faadu dialogs and love the way he talks 🤣...i m like - ye banda kitna bolta hai 🤣...pehla show hoga jisme banda itna zyada bolta hai aur bandi chup kar ke khadi rehti hai 🤣🤣

Quote

itsRitzi

@itsRitzi

Achiever

+ 7

Posted: 12 years ago

#42

Hmm u r right never noticed tat much but ya i also tght tat VD dialogues more effective!!

Didnt knw tat BV MB HAS same dialogue writers omg thanks for telling

ya DD has good hang over english !!

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Sonu

@applenpeaches

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#43

Last few days I have been trying to listen to both the leads and trying to understand what you were saying.. Only difference I could find was that VD has a sharp, clear voice which helps to give that extra punch to his lines, while DD's husky voice makes her dialogues shaky..

As for the difference in their hindi, again I have to announce my ignorance to the whole world.. My hindi is so poor (much much worser than my english) that I open my mouth only when speaking to ignorants. I remember this incident in college when me and a group of colleagues went to Pune and I was the only one who knew any hindi.. They said my hindi is very good. That impression lasted until we reached Pune.. Well, what I am trying to say is... I am not the best judge of Hindi diction... Besides I have no idea about Mumbai Hindi, Delhi Hindi and Kanpur Hindi.. So I guess, for people like me, hindi is just that hindi.. But I do get what you said in your posts...

Edited by applenpeaches - 12 years ago

Quote

Shridevi Gaddam

@0-SD-0

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#44

Originally posted by: applenpeaches
Last few days I have been trying to listen to both the leads and trying to understand what you were saying.. Only difference I could find was that VD has a sharp, clear voice which helps to give that extra punch to his lines, while DD's husky voice makes her dialogues shaky..
As for the difference in their hindi, again I have to announce my ignorance to the whole world.. My hindi is so poor (much much worser than my english) that I open my mouth only when speaking to ignorants. I remember this incident in college when me and a group of colleagues went to Pune and I was the only one who knew any hindi.. They said my hindi is very good. That impression lasted until we reached Pune.. Well, what I am trying to say is... I am not the best judge of Hindi diction... Besides I have no idea about Mumbai Hindi, Delhi Hindi and Kanpur Hindi.. So I guess, for people like me, hindi is just that hindi.. But I do get what you said in your posts...

😃

That reminds me of the slights I received at the hands of our landlord's daughter when I was 5 or 6 year old. Dad got transferred from Bhavnagar (gujrat) to Ahmedabad. So I was talking to the girl in the gujrati I knew. Don't know what was wrong with my Gujrati that she called her mom (who was like a Lalita Pawar to me) and complained that my language is wierd and as if that was offensive to her. The mother asks me some questions and I answer. She then says, She speaks Kathiawaadi Gujrati as if that was a shame and how they could allow such dirty people to rent their house.

That was my first heart-felt discrimination. I never understood it, never got affected by it, but I kept it in my impressions. Because it helped in survival. I am a telngana Telugu and so have always been discriminated by Andhraites.

So much for that slight...I forgot Gujrati the same year I entered the Andhra territory in yet another Dad's transfer. 😆 And so much for my mother tongue and struggle to have an easy life, I just discarded it. So Hindi and English are my acquired mother tongues and I am not perfect in either of them. What a sad story ! 😔

Sonu,

All this observation and social practice comes under mannerisms of the age. Yes, things today in 2012 are not the same as they were in 1979 or 1980. But then mannerisms and etiquettes are always to stay. They are like fashion. Its vanity and yet you cannot ignore.

Quote

1 2 3 4 5

Diction: poorly credited yet so effective - Page 5

Related Topics

Explore Topics