these three make me itch for the ability to use prof. lupin's ridickullous charm everytime they appear in a show. 🤔 just laughing out loudly at them is not working!
* okay, so what's with tulsi-baa now being on kt's tail to make sure she knows "all the shantiniketan bahu-param-para"? this girl came to bombay to study and make something of herself? and the highest achievement is a shantiniketan wife???
i can't describe how unspeakably gross i found that sequence. ('course, didn't help that it had lakshya looking like a beaming pumpkin in a violently coloured shirt...)
* btw, did anyone notice that the flashback had previously unused material?
* why isn't lakshya talking to eklavya bhaiyya? 😔
tell you why i obsess about this: the first time that eklavya knew that kt-lakshya had found out about his obsession, the most beautiful part was when eklavya walks to lakshya to reassure him because he loves his little brother.
the least that lakshya can do just now is talk to eklavya - to say, "hey i'm sorry for this public mess. kt and i did it together and thought it would be cool, even though it was really stupid. we did it because we love you. please forgive me/us?"
even if it means that he might get punched out. and lakshya is not created as a character who is afraid of getting punched out, i thought? 😕 why can't lakshya show that he loves his brother enough for eklavya virani to never become ansh virani? lakshya had promised.
talk to eklavya bhaiyya, lakshya.
* didn't the shadow in kt's room look rather like lakshya's?
* hasn't kt learned anything from her previous episodes of being impetuous? she created large amounts of misery with lakshya when she leaped to the conclusion that he was making merry with sanya earlier.
now she leaps to the conclusion that eklavya is out to get her? and she has no qualms about using the most accusatory language ever!
or is this just part of the shantiniketan bahu param-para?
* i felt soooo miserable for eklavya on this show.
* everyone on this show needs to be taught how to speak in a clear and not-to-be-misunderstood way. is it so difficult???