Originally posted by: aryapdane
I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth but rather, I was telling you that using the words "reality check" wasn't very respectful. I gave you the benefit of doubt and tried to explain that you didn't have to use those words as they can be viewed as coming from a place of superiority complex. And it does carry a misogynistic connotation. I didn't say you were being a misogynist, or you were intentionally trying to look down upon people for liking PraShiv. But since you have chosen to double down on this, you should know that you are no one to give me, or anyone here, a reality check.
Secondly, you are referencing characters who have nothing to do with the present storyline of Kumkum Bhagya or referencing different shows altogether. What does RV and whichever Tom, Dick and Harry have to do with my liking for PraShiv? Then there are whole chunks about what you had hoped the writers had shown and you're criticising the show on the basis of scenes you have imagined in your head. "He should have deployed his man power in Prathana's search and not wait for someone's call." [Adding this here so that you don't accuse me of putting words in your mouth]. And then you go on about how his dialogues didn't carry "conviction and the intensity in his eyes" like some other male leads. You have decided that Shivansh doesn't have the conviction to stand by his wife in the same manner as some character in Naagin. But what is the basis of this? Did Shivansh leave Prathana at the mercy of the goons after he said that he'll protect her? Has he not fought for her, risked his life to save her?
The fact that Shivansh doesn't love or like Prathana is not news to us. In fact the whole point of the show is that a guy has married a girl he doesn't love or like or barely even knows but because of our traditional belief that marriages happen due to fate, these two were always destined to be married and will fall in love with each other through the course of their marriage. So of course his behaviour initially will be problematic. No one in this thread have said that his comments to Prathana weren't rude or cruel. So I don't know why you thought that you should become the repository of sanity and save us from our delusions, give us the reality check that we are in desperate need of.
Frankly, at this point, I don't even care what you feel about Shivansh's character. Whether he's a misogynist or a career criminal, doesn't matter to me. What I object to is your disrespectful tone towards me (one of the people who likes PraShiv and who you were trying to address) that you're now trying to hide behind your one foot hypothetical essay about how male leads should be, how much intensity they should have in their eyes, or how the CVs should build love and trust in their show. If you have criticisms about the show or characters, stick to that, in an objective tone, without trying to educate anyone about their connection to reality.
"And it does carry a misogynistic connotation. I didn't say you were being a misogynist, or you were intentionally trying to look down upon people for liking PraShiv. But since you have chosen to double down on this, you should know that you are no one to give me, or anyone here, a reality check. But since you have chosen to double down on this, you should know that you are no one to give me, or anyone here, a reality check. "
I think you are contradicting yourself.Putting some random points about a woman society god knows who? Are you yourself clear about what you want to write or express?Yeah so you will get the same double down response from me also and yeah call it a reality check too or if you don't like the word "Reality Check" let's say I have shown you the mirror itself.
Getting back to the second point yes I have and I will reference Tom Dick and Harry just like any other viewer is becuase their connection is with the revenge theme itself.
"And then you go on about how his dialogues didn't carry "conviction and the intensity in his eyes" like some other male leads. You have decided that Shivansh doesn't have the conviction to stand by his wife in the same manner as some character in Naagin. But what is the basis of this? Did Shivansh leave Prathana at the mercy of the goons after he said that he'll protect her? Has he not fought for her, risked his life to save her?"
Have you cared to read my post which you have quoted? I had stated that"I have stated before that I appreciate Shivansh's actions of saving her but this could have been done by Raunak too in his place as Prarthana's husband.Just bcoz he saves her does not mean that he's goody type two shoes.His actions are villanious and his character progression lacks the depth.What does he want exactly"
Shivansh did save Prathana from those human traffickers nobody denies that here but here's my answer rearding your point of Shivansh fighting tooth and nail for his wife Prathana " Shivansh helped only when Preeta sounded desparate on the phone otherwise he wouldnt have bothered to check on his wife that's the basic storyline which cannot be ignored all right howsoever someone might try to defend his actions".I had stated that I hoped that Shivansh cares for Prathana throughout her character journey and his actions of saving her from those goons shows the actions of a husband protecting his wife but it does not absolve the past actions of the ML character.
" So I don't know why you thought that you should become the repository of sanity and save us from our delusions, give us the reality check that we are in desperate need of. "
Repository of Sanity huh? Delusions.You want to know about delusion-If any villainous character marries a person irrespective of gender by deceit and then when that person confronts that villain regarding its actions and that villain replies to that person that the same villain doesn't care about that person's views/feelings regarding the actions and not only that that same villain ditches that married person to the streets at late night then what the hell does it display-Love?
"Frankly, at this point, I don't even care what you feel about Shivansh's character. Whether he's a misogynist or a career criminal, doesn't matter to me. What I object to is your disrespectful tone towards me (one of the people who likes PraShiv and who you were trying to address) that you're now trying to hide behind your one foot hypothetical essay about how male leads should be, how much intensity they should have in their eyes, or how the CVs should build love and trust in their show. If you have criticisms about the show or characters, stick to that, in an objective tone, without trying to educate anyone about their connection to reality."
I had stated the same point earlier itself that you should have stick to the plot itself instead of going on a long irrelevant rant about some women society etc etc.I agree and understand the admiration you or any other person could have for Shivansh.I liked RV myself but criticized his wrong actions too.It was you disrespected me first all right.
But the mere fact is that you got irritated by the harsh criticism about Shivansh.So yeah me or any other person might have opposite views or harsh criticisms about your favorite character.If you don't like it just deal with it bcoz its gonna keep coming.
I know that no ML character is perfect and it has certain flaws.But its not gonna be immune from certain criticisms if its character is weak or its even toxic.Either me or somebody else would point out the same.
I wont give a damn if you or any other person puts words into my mouth or writes certain illogical points which has no connection with the damn storyline itself.
647