Contract!!! - Page 2

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Tia.0

@Tia.0

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#11

Here's how the joint owner can get her joint rights. First make it very clear with in simple words, that if the original owner ever takes executive decision without her consent, she will break the merger and buy some other beach.

Secondly, make it very clear that this is a partnership and not a owner and slave relationship. Hence she won't tolerate him thinking on her behalf. She has a perfectly working brain of her own.

Thirdly, for heaven's sake, grow a spine and stop rewarding his mistakes.

Dev probably expects another romantic surprise date in exchange of another sole decision taken without Sona's consent.

Originally posted by: rose4ever
Will the original owner ever think about the joint owner's dreams and happiness instead of falling prey to the manager's manipulations?
The manager's facade is wearing off but the original owner still refuses to see it!
The manager was talking about the woman and expressing her "concern" and suddenly forgot about it to talk about herself.And still the original owner is clueless🤔

Quote

Shilky88

@Shilky88

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#12

I used to love your direct post as well.😃😊

They meant to convey a direct message and a reality check to all characters in show.😉

To your story:-

All my hopes with the new partner in merger now. After all its just not about the woman who left the mountain and came to back to beach.

Its about intentions of manager to keep both the partners deprive of their partnership's rights and privileges.

New partner has already started sensing it and I totally loved her when she did not let the manager manipulate her at dining table again. Some people just deserve to be replied in their own crazy/insane style and I am sure the new partner knows very well how to do that.😈

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

rose4ever

@rose4ever

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: tia.o
Here's how the joint owner can get her joint rights. First make it very clear with in simple words, that if the original owner ever takes executive decision without her consent, she will break the merger and buy some other beach.

Secondly, make it very clear that this is a partnership and not a owner and slave relationship. Hence she won't tolerate him thinking on her behalf. She has a perfectly working brain of her own.

Thirdly, for heaven's sake, grow a spine and stop rewarding his mistakes.

Dev probably expects another romantic surprise date in exchange of another sole decision taken without Sona's consent.

Seriously.If she lets this go without speaking about it,then she should be prepared for a repeat telecast of this every single time she plans something with Dev.

Edited by rose4ever - 8 years ago

Quote

AnnTaylor

@AnnTaylor

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

#14

This sounds like a micromanagement- the manager because of controlling nature is ruining confidence of owner and the new partner. The only advice I can give now is for the owner to identify the manager's over exploitive tendencies and fire her before she start damaging the joint partnership . The contracts should be rewritten and signed by both parties: that they should have equal voice in carrying out the project & no third party interference is allowed.

Quote

Tia.0

@Tia.0

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#15

Thank you. I felt some people weren't getting my points, so I tried to simplify my points. The people who got my direct post are smart, so they will get this as well. 😉

As far as my story is concerned, the new partner needs to stand her ground against the original owner. Protecting herself is in her power. However, she can't save the original owner from the manager unless the original owner wants to be saved. That is not in her hand.

Originally posted by: Shilky88
I used to love your direct post as well.😃😊
They meant to convey a direct message and a reality check to all characters in show.😉

To your story:-

All my hopes with the new partner in merger now. After all its just not about the woman who left the mountain and came to back to beach.

Its about intentions of manager to keep both the partners deprive of their partnership's rights and privileges.

New partner has already started sensing it and I totally loved her when she did not let the manager manipulate her at dining table again. Some people just deserve to be replied in their own crazy/insane style and I am sure the new partner knows very well how to do that.😈

Quote

Tia.0

@Tia.0

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#16

That's what I predicted last time and the time before marriage, and within two days of the last prediction the repeat happened. You can't expect change without consequences. Rewarding something unacceptable doesn't fix it.

Originally posted by: rose4ever

Seriously.If she lets this go without speaking about it,then she should be prepared for a repeat telecast of this every single time she plans something with Dev.

Quote

Tia.0

@Tia.0

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#17

That's an excellent advice. But can only be implemented if the original owner is willing to see the manager for what she is. However at the very least, the joint owner can stand her ground and refuse to give any authority to the original owner to take decision on her behalf or to teach him a lesson, go ahead and start taking decisions without discussing it with him. Some people needs to be shown rather than told.

Originally posted by: AnnTaylor
This sounds like a micromanagement- the manager because of controlling nature is ruining confidence of owner and the new partner. The only advice I can give now is for the owner to identify the manager's over exploitive tendencies and fire her before she start damaging the joint partnership . The contracts should be rewritten and signed by both parties: that they should have equal voice in carrying out the project & no third party interference is allowed.

Quote

gemini54

@gemini54

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#18

Tia in this whole thing I am not even bringing the Easwari equation into this mess because LEGALLY 'Marriage is only between two consenting Adults'.

I know people may say family plays a role and and all which has some validity but the Bottom Line is 'IT IS ONLY BETWEEN TWO CONSENTING ADULTS'

The issue here is one of the Adult really did not have the authority to Consent maybe because he was not adult enough to make the decision to consent maybe a Minor so the Adult in his life made the decision for Him and he went with the flow.

But he is forgetting he may not be the Adult who consented to get into the marriage but the marriage nevertheless involved another 'ADULT who for whatever reasons believes the Man to be an adult so hoping to make adult decisions only with HIM especially when it involves intimacy .

Because as far as the Legality of Marriage it is ONLY between two consenting Adults NOT three adults, or two adults and a Minor!

Maybe this show is rewriting what the legality of marriage really is!

Edited by gemini54 - 8 years ago

Quote

AnnTaylor

@AnnTaylor

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

#19

Yes, that's what I wanted the joint owner to do. In the meantime the original owner with the help of smart joint owner can figure out the manager's issues and give her an assurance of life long severance package?

Originally posted by: tia.o

<font size="3" color="#003366">That's an excellent advice. But can only be implemented if the original owner is willing to see the manager for what she is. However at the very least, the joint owner can stand her ground and refuse to give any authority to the original owner to take decision on her behalf or to teach him a lesson, go ahead and start taking decisions without discussing it with him. Some people needs to be shown rather than told.</font>

Quote

Tia.0

@Tia.0

Sparkler

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#20

Precisely. I don't blame Ishwari for her behaviour.

We are very quick to blame other people for our mess.

When someone's husband has an affair, we call the other woman names. Why?

Was the other woman married to me? No.

My husband was married to me. So my expectations were with him, my trust was with him and if he betrays me, then it's him I am going to blame, no one else.

Same situation apply here. Ishwari did not hold a gun to Dev's head to take a decision himself. He could have went to Sonakshi who was present in the same house at the same time.

He got offended when Sonakshi took the decision to fast without discussing with him when he was not even present and had no opinion regarding the decision that Sonakshi knew of.

Now it's twice since the marriage when he took decisions without discussing with Sonakshi while she was present in the same house knowing her opinion and wishes without discussing her.

And people are still trying to find excuses for his behaviour.

I said before marriage and I said since then that Dev should not have got married when he is already married to his past and obligations. Moreover, he is a blind puppet on string for his mother to play anyway she wants to.

A person who has no freewill and no life of his own has no right to get married.

When I was young there was a religious story about a Goddess where a man who was an indentured slave gets married only to turn his wife into an indentured slave herself. And how the wife after much hardship and with the Goddess's blessings set both of them free was the story (I think it was Lakshmi or Santoshi Maa of sort)

I thought at that time too that why did the man get married if he was a slave?

Do you see any difference here?

Originally posted by: gemini54
Tia in this whole thing I am not even bringing the Easwari equation into this mess because LEGALLY 'Marriage is only between two consenting Adults'.

I know people may say family plays a role and and all which has some validity but the Bottom Line is 'IT IS ONLY BETWEEN TWO CONSENTING ADULTS'

The issue here is one of the Adult really did not have the authority to Consent maybe because he was not adult enough to make the decision to consent maybe a Minor so the Adult in his life made the decision for Him and he went with the flow.

But he is forgetting he may not be the Adult who consented to get into the marriage but the marriage nevertheless involved another 'ADULT who for whatever reasons believes the Man to be an adult so hoping to make adult decisions only with HIM especially when it involves intimacy .

Because as far as the Legality of Marriage it is ONLY between two consenting Adults NOT three adults, or two adults and a Minor!

Maybe this show is rewriting what the legality of marriage really is!

Quote

1 2 3 4

Contract!!! - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics