Originally posted by: MayurArti_rocks
I am with Veer in this case. Why do we need to remind and treat her as someone's widow! Why can't she be an individual who is starting fresh in her life again as an individual not as someone's widow. Society and her family had forced her into an unwanted marriage, yes she accepted and obeyed all the responsibilities which were first imposed and later she went with the flow. But why does she need to obey the same after the death of that only person who mattered upto certain extent in that relationship!
It is like Shukla's and Sunaina's are hell bound to put that shackle around her feet , is this only because she is a widow! Shukla's do not consider her as their daughter in law, Mrs. Shukla very well said they do not want any tie with her, treated her worse than animal, so why should she should consider herself tied to that family ? Is it only because she was forced to marry only of the sons of that family?I think she has done whatever was expected from her as widow. If Krishna prefers to spend her entire life as widow, I am with her, its her choice. But why others will make that choice for her.
I am happy that Veer does not see her as widow, he knows that part of his life, accepted that and did not bound Krishna's life with only that part, rather treated her as an individual. He did not put that societal shackle around her feet, that is commendable 👏
