Originally posted by: MayurArti_rocks
I am with Veer in this case. Why do we need to remind and treat her as someone's widow! Why can't she be an individual who is starting her life fresh as an individual not as someone's widow. Society and her family had forced her into an unwanted marriage, yes she accepted and obeyed all the responsibilities which were first imposed and later she went with the flow. But why does she need to obey the same after Radhey's death, only person who mattered in that relarionship upto certain extent !
Shukla's and Sunaina are hell bend to put shackle around her feet , is this only because she is a widow, is that her only identity! Shukla's do not consider her their daughter in law, Mrs. Shukla very well said they do not want to maintain any tie with her, treated her worse than animal, she was a burden for them, so why should she consider herself tied to that family ? Is it only because she was forced to marry one of the sons of that family?
I think she has done whatever was expected from her as widow. If Krishna prefers to spend her entire life as widow, I am with her, its her choice. But why others will make that choice for her?
I am happy that Veer does not see her only as widow, he knows that part of her life, accepted it and did not bind Krishna's life only with that truth, rather treated her as an individual. He did not put that societal shackle around her feet, that is commendable 👏
