this new kkavya is not good

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

dramaqueen3000

@dramaqueen3000

Inactive

Posted: 20 years ago

#11

Rakshak is best suited for the role i really wish they bring him back

Quote

aashi

@aashi

Explorer

Posted: 20 years ago

#12

actually speaking , ejaz is a much better actor n performer but rakshak was really cuute..i miss him..i thot he'll make a comeback as prem in kasuatti ..but ektas brought in sum really yukk guy as prem... hey any one knows when are v gonns see rakskak again...

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

ejazfan1

@ejazfan1

Inactive

Posted: 20 years ago

#13

ejaz is da best he can do any role & hez lookin really kool in kavya'z role

Quote

shahrukhs_gal

@shahrukhs_gal

Inactive

Posted: 20 years ago

#14

I think Rakshak is better as kkavy coz ejaz has no face expresions ... 😳 well thats what i think 😃

Quote

shahrukhs_gal

@shahrukhs_gal

Inactive

Posted: 20 years ago

#15

hey if anyone of u people watch Kahiin To Hoga or Kesar u will see the new kkavy in those programmes 👏

Quote

shahrukhs_gal

@shahrukhs_gal

Inactive

Posted: 20 years ago

#16

and besides the new kkavy is really really ugly

😉

Quote

dramaqueen3000

@dramaqueen3000

Inactive

Posted: 20 years ago

#17

Ya they have got some yucky prem. He was the same guy who interviews those actors on sony before movie premiers. I think she shudve put Rakshak instead of tht guy for Prem. I was waitin to c rakshak in kasauti but was very disappointed.

Edited by dramaqueen3000 - 20 years ago

Quote

huma

@cutestgirl_211

Inactive

Posted: 20 years ago

#18

didnt u read the article he took 8 hours to do 1 scene...they r also rite not to put rakshak in the show...but he suited the character

Quote

dramaqueen3000

@dramaqueen3000

Inactive

Posted: 20 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: cutestgirl_211
didnt u read the article he took 8 hours to do 1 scene...they r also rite not to put rakshak in the show...but he suited the character

Which article was this??