Katha Ankahee -- #14 daily EDT [DT NOTE PG 121] - Page 21

She has a very strong " fear of loosing Viaan" since that is all she has ...it can be very bad for Viaan married life to any one !

Even though Teju finds a girl for Viaan also she will create troubles sooner or later !

She is paranoid because of her fear , character is slightly neurotic , which Farah uses for manipulation !

Where as Viaan handles his mom with more genuine affection

Really beautiful to see

Originally posted by: Rosh4rose

She has a very strong " fear of loosing Viaan" since that is all she has ...it can be very bad for Viaan married life to any one !

Even though Teju finds a girl fir Viaan also she will created trouble sooner or later !

She is paranoid because of her fear , character is slightly neurotic , which Farah uses for manipulation !

Where Viaan handles his mom with more genuine affection

Really beautiful to see

Teji's insecurities stem from Viraj-Seema incidence. So basically, Viraj-Seema is responsible for her paranoid behaviour which will affect Viaan and his wife later. Instead of apologising to Teji for what had happened to her and family, they are making her villain and other team is being white washed in the name of love🤢🤢

Originally posted by: Lethamukund

I am disappointed with the track and the show. 🤢🤢 Disgusting

They must keep in mind the societal context in which the show is being aired. In Indian context, marriage is super sacred institution.

Teji was the first and only legal wife (second marriage is illegal unless you take divorce from first wife). Both Viraj and Seema were aware of first marriage. Basically both of them started an illicit relationship knowingly and willingly. Seema is obviously his illegal woman and a home breaker. She snatched away a father from son and husband from wife.

They should be ready to face the consequences of their own actions. Now Seema begging to get acceptance is ridiculous😡

Any woman in Teji's place would have acted and reacted the same way. She lost her husband, she was scared to loose son. Quite natural. So she tried to keep Viaan away.

Viraj is the villain, and he chose his own happiness over his son. He ill treated Teji infront of her own son. Then he writes letters saying that he loves his son. What kind of love is it where a father loves his son very much, at the same time disrespects and breaks his own mother and even disrespects their family?😡 If this is called "love from a father", better not to have such loving father

Seema is the second vile person, who willingly entered into an illicit person, snatched away father from a child and is now asking recognition to her and her illicit child from the same child. She is cunning😡😡

Teji is the victim, who will now be more insecure and restless for her lifetime as her relation with her son is in turmoil with this track.

Does it mean Teji as a woman was used as a tool to deliver Viaan, as a product for Viraj to love him as his son? Does Teji hold a respectable position other than a machine to deliver a son?😡

Teji should have slapped Viraj while leaving and if she did not allow Viraj to contact Viaan, she is right from her POV. Does Viaan deserve a father who does not love his mother? Does he deserve a father who does not recognise them as a family?

In all of these, Viaan is the biggest victim. He lost his father while he was a child. With this un necessary truth revelation, he lost his beautiful relation with his mother.

Vanya is also victim. Poor girl is born out of wedlock and comes with a lot of baggage.😭

Why Katha had to investigate and give justice to Viraj's illegal second woman and illicit child? I really hate Katha for being biassed towards Seema and Vanya and putting all blames on Teji😡

She should stay away from his family matters and does not poke her nose in anything and everything in his life

Pre cap is really ugly. Viaan hugging Seema who broke his mothers' home🤢🤢 And he is angry with his own mom and saying sorry to his dad who left them for his own happiness🥺🥺

I really don't understand what do they want to prove with this white washing of Viraj and Seema. Does it mean tomorrow Viaan can also fall in love with some one else after his marriage with Katha and leaving her and child? Will it be accepted in the name of falling out of love with her and falling in love with some one else?

Does it mean a man can marry a woman, make a child with her, claim that he is not in love with her any more and walk out and make another family with his new found love? And he can repeat the cycle as long as he wants?Is it what our values teach us? I am disappointed👎🏼👎🏼

Originally posted by: G259

I agree that these things do happen.But makers of TV shows show them to justify EMA.They could have shown that Seema and Viraj were in love with eo before his marriage with Teji.Then Teji playing tricks along with Farah to get married to him for xyz reasons.That could have actually villainized Teji and Seema-Viraj would have got sympathy from audience if that was their aim.

We must wait first

I can find no fault in Teju for not accepting the divorce , but giving journalists money calling Seema " prostitute " was wrong .

First of all Vraaj should have named Male prostitute, then only call the other woman prostitute!

Look at the situation it is so easy to destroy a woman !

Teju doesn't look normal to me , she has some personality trouble , she is permanently gas lighted by Farah .. Unlike Eshan , Farah is very dangerous friend !

Yes you are right !

Both children are the victims Viaan and Vaanya., both them developed their own personality problem since both grown up to be " adults with a lot of flows emotionally "

I pity the children both of them@

It is our society concept to stay in the unhappy marriage and suffer for the sake of children most of the time every society norms are written for " middle class both upper lower)

No one bothers what a very poor person , does.e th ! No one cares

We see how celebrities break another women's life and worshipped by people , I am not telling it is good or bad !

Society always has double standards so do the system

There are a lot of other areas to this !

In my opinion--

Viraaj us no 1 culprit in this mess

Seema no 2 and Teju no 3

The two victims are Viaan & Vanya..

Both children suffered one with neurotic mother other with a sick mother

One had money other had nothing to fend , but I can't really grade them since ... pain like love can't be measured... It varies person to person even perception and reacting to it !

Oh God it sounds so serious.what I wrote .. 🤣I hate to write serous because I can't stop it

The end of serious stuff 🤣

Originally posted by: Lethamukund

Teji's insecurities stem from Viraj-Seema incidence. So basically, Viraj-Seema is responsible for her paranoid behaviour which will affect Viaan and his wife later. Instead of apologising to Teji for what had happened to her and family, they are making her villain and other team is being white washed in the name of love🤢🤢Kshlid

But Minu lady told first Viraj and Teju had problems in their marriage then only Seema came in

That is what I remember but Teju had no right to destroy only Seema's name. Teju is not that innocent either nor do she had the right yo stop Viaan from meeting the father!.

Mothers must understand our children arevnot our properties they do have personality and their own rights

They came trough Mothers but they are natures being doesn't belong to Mothers

Taken from .. The Prophet .. Kahalid Gibran. Not by me

Moral of the story- An extramarital affair cannot be justified no matter how strong the newly found divine love be..Hope this message reaches the makers too and they really stop this idiotic track.

Ideally viraj should have waited for the divorce to happen and then make his relationship official with Seema. I dont know why they went for an another kid when they already knew that she will never have a normal childhood.. Seema and Viraj did wrong to vanya too..

letha -- the reason this track is coming off as really strange is the emphasis on love and how that is license to do whatever. that is very strange thinking within the Indian context.

have mentioned this long time ago but in many Indian languages, we have several words for love -- romantic love is right next to lust and is on the bottom. we see love as a fleeting and fickle emotion. it is why we don't really emphasize or talk about it so much.

now respect on the other hand such a strong emotional connotation which just does not come across in english. just say 'izzat' and how strongly we feel.

I am reminded of a bagya lakshmi serial scene where the daughter will be rude to the 2nd wife for telling her to study. then the grandfather will chide her saying, "first of all, she is your father's wife and you should respect her. you don't have to like her but you need to respect her as your elder because of her relationship with your father. you don't have to like or agree with what happened between your parents but that has nothing to do with you. however as a human being and a woman, you should give her respect as that is our culture."

for me, that is what this conflict should be about -- the battle for respect. teji blackened a man's name after his death. that is such a no-no in our culture because honour, name and reputation is so highly valued. that is the crux. now in order to get respect, you cannot justify your actions in the name of love.

viraj was unhappy and wanted to leave -- that is okay in my book. as ruchita mentioned, there have been many murders and crimes when people wanted to exit a marriage. in many crime patrol episode, the host will say, "just choose divorce. please don't resort to murder".

in some families, there may not be physical murder but it is so emotionally toxic where they all hate each other and kids end up despising marriage and love. so in those kind of emotionally toxic and turbulent situations, it is best if the couple splits up rather than hurt each other.

there was a regional debate show where adult children said openly they wished parents didn't stay together for the sake of children because they were so miserable growing up.

so if viraj wanted to leave -- happens. viraj wanted to live with someone else and a different life -- happens. teji was upset and created drama -- happens.

now what I find weird is the justification track by using the excuse of love. that is very strange. viraj was unhappy and that had nothing to do with whether he loved teji or not. their marriage was clearly a mismatch and that happens a lot in arranged marriage. so why are they talking so much about love? that I don't get. it is irrelevant if he fell in love with seema -- if not seema, it would have been someone else because he was unhappy and he wanted a different life. these things happen.

so all this justification by using the word love is total bakwas. seema is a 3rd party which is a fact. it is also fact that that she wasn't mistress but more second wife. we can debate law and legalities but within Indian context, second wife does have some respect.

so teji's actions on their izzat was messed up -- seema should have been given the respect of second wife and viraj was not some playboy. maligning a man's character after his death where he is not around to defend himself is a real low. so if the makers just approached from the izzat/respect angle without going into this weird tangent about love, it would feel more desi. all this talk about love makes me feel like I am watching some western show.

humans are messy. just show how the relationship and marriage deteriorated without doing a black and white approach. I can't believe I am saying this but even serials like bagya lakshmi and anupama had a far more sophisticated understanding of how marriages unraveled. 😆

Because they are selfish , they couldn't wait .

I really despise the scene " the arrogance Viraj walked out of the house ... leaving Teju an scared Vian"

It was not good it was pathetic, there should have been more human ways to do it ! It pricks my heart the way he did it 🤢

First of all " true ❤️ love doesn't do this it is not selfish, it doesn't possess , those two could have waited not to break a home , a child

Mother and a son !

But calling Seema prostitute was not right either

Originally posted by: Rosh4rose

Because they are selfish , they couldn't wait .

I really despise the scene " the arrogance Viraj walked out of the house ... leaving Teju an scared Vian"

It was not good it was pathetic, there should have been more human ways to do ut@

First of all " true ❤️ love doesn't not selfish, it doesn't possess , those two could have waited not to break a

Mother and a son !

But calling Seema prostitute was not right either