Good guy making mistakes versus redeeming a bad guy - Page 16

Originally posted by: moniloveanupre

hadpna is not bussiness what he is doung with basu publication is not business

its clear capturing the top business as he doesnot his own anything

but its too early to predict bajaj one was very fairplay in bussines no wonder pre1 cons8der him as her mentor

I have no idea what he is doing or has been doing with the Basu so cant comment on that.. obv its gonna be illogical just like Komo had everything in her hands..

I love KSG as Mr. Bajaj like anything. However, these writers have no idea about business and commerce. Anyone with an average business sense could have gauged share prices rising when major investors are selling their shares is fishy, and Anurag was all, so what, it doesn't matter etc. I won't blame him. The writers could have at least Googled it. Secondly, shell company. 😆 Firstly, if it were that easy for Mr. Das to figure out it was a shell company, the authorities would have found it much more easily. I am not even going into what authorities. Secondly, artificially driving down stock prices by aggravating some employee strike is unethical and illegal too. 😆

because hero, the good guy is kept on a pedestal, right there at the top, above all human flaws... so if he does anything which is not perfect he is dethroned from the same pedestal without giving any consideration to human flaws
vs
redeeming a bad guy, this in a sense gives hope, light at the end of the tunnel... psychologically .. like if this person can change then anyone can change for the better and with good environment with love and care a person cam change for the better and people connect with the "hope and impending positivity" here .

we have two different systems to measure these two characters .. while a whip is lashed at the good guy for the slightest of the human flaws ... a bad guy who is on the way of redemption is treated with TLC , if we considered bad guy as human flaw we don't give the same leverage to the good guy when he errs... it's like a perfect one cannot afford to do humanly mistakes seems to be an unsaid rule, !

The first ranker in a class cannot afford to get 2nd rank , but the one who always used to get 40% would be well appreciated if he gets 60% . human logic ,,

Some people have to be sarcastic in every thread, they can say and do anything, but when others do all hell break loss.

They don't understand the basiss of freedom of opinion.

Originally posted by: najma123

I love KSG as Mr. Bajaj like anything. However, these writers have no idea about business and commerce. Anyone with an average business sense could have gauged share prices rising when major investors are selling their shares is fishy, and Anurag was all, so what, it doesn't matter etc. I won't blame him. The writers could have at least Googled it. Secondly, shell company. 😆 Firstly, if it were that easy for Mr. Das to figure out it was a shell company, the authorities would have found it much more easily. I am not even going into what authorities. Secondly, artificially driving down stock prices by aggravating some employee strike is unethical and illegal too. 😆

No logic, common sense, business sense or medical science in Ka100t please.. Its an insult 😂🤣😂

They know best 😝

Originally posted by: munnihyderabad

because hero, the good guy is kept on a pedestal, right there at the top, above all human flaws... so if he does anything which is not perfect he is dethroned from the same pedestal without giving any consideration to human flaws
vs
redeeming a bad guy, this in a sense gives hope, light at the end of the tunnel... psychologically .. like if this person can change then anyone can change for the better and with good environment with love and care a person cam change for the better and people connect with the "hope and impending positivity" here .

we have two different systems to measure these two characters .. while a whip is lashed at the good guy for the slightest of the human flaws ... a bad guy who is on the way of redemption is treated with TLC , if we considered bad guy as human flaw we don't give the same leverage to the good guy when he errs... it's like a perfect one cannot afford to do humanly mistakes seems to be an unsaid rule, !

The first ranker in a class cannot afford to get 2nd rank , but the one who always used to get 40% would be well appreciated if he gets 60% . human logic ,,

Take a bow ❤️

Originally posted by: nailah_AnuPre

I have no idea what he is doing or has been doing with the Basu so cant comment on that.. obv its gonna be illogical just like Komo had everything in her hands..

but its not a fair play pheet peeche bar karna kahte hai isse

kom bhi sammne se aai thi yr

but lets wait for his character development & i dont find him strong or intelligent

agar itna dum hai bajaj publication shuru kate basu publication ke sammne & bring the war

but lets wait

It's like, if you have great expectations from a good man, and he does anything slightly wrong (for lack of a better term), you'll obviously feel betrayed and shocked.

On the other side, if you have zero expectations from a bad man, and he does something good, or morally different from his usual manner, you'll feel surprised and impressed and proud of the person who was able to change him.

IMO

Originally posted by: moniloveanupre

as i early comnent on th thread what bajju did is not black

but its not a fair play pheet peeche bar karna kahte hai isse

kom bhi sammne se aai thi yr

but lets wait for his character development & i dont find him strong or intelligent

agar itna dum hai bajaj publication shuru kate basu publication ke sammne & bring the war

but lets wait

If he doesnt take over BP then how will he blackmail my bacchi? Come on Moni, thats the track.. only one climax : AnuPre’s separation..

Originally posted by: munnihyderabad

because hero, the good guy is kept on a pedestal, right there at the top, above all human flaws... so if he does anything which is not perfect he is dethroned from the same pedestal without giving any consideration to human flaws
vs
redeeming a bad guy, this in a sense gives hope, light at the end of the tunnel... psychologically .. like if this person can change then anyone can change for the better and with good environment with love and care a person cam change for the better and people connect with the "hope and impending positivity" here .

we have two different systems to measure these two characters .. while a whip is lashed at the good guy for the slightest of the human flaws ... a bad guy who is on the way of redemption is treated with TLC , if we considered bad guy as human flaw we don't give the same leverage to the good guy when he errs... it's like a perfect one cannot afford to do humanly mistakes seems to be an unsaid rule, !

The first ranker in a class cannot afford to get 2nd rank , but the one who always used to get 40% would be well appreciated if he gets 60% . human logic ,,

very well penned down

but is it unfair na

no wonder ppl dont like good guys ppl love grey character