hi guys,
KkavyAngad, I agree with most of the things u have said except Accusation#3. The example u have given is valid on its own, but it does not really relate to Prem and Mukti's case. U are right, if a guy invites a girl @ midnight and she gets raped on the way he is not responsible for it. There would be only 2 people responsible. The rapist ofcourse and secondly the GIRL HERSELF because regardless of what the guy said she took a risk of travelling @ midnight alone to his place. We all are responsible to some extent to take care of ourselves and when we get attacked/injured by our own carelessnes then we are also responsible to some extent for whatever that happend to us. However, in Prem-Mukti case, Mukti was drugged by prem, therefore putting her in a situation where she COULD NOT take care of herself. Had she been in her senses she could have called for help and saved herself, not to mention in that case Shared wouldn't even have approached her. Mukti was in her own home surrounded by atleast a hundred people including her own family. In her normal condition Mukti had not put herself at risk. BUT PREM PUT MUKTI AT RISK KNOWINGLY!! He may not have known or realised things could get that bad for her but atleast he should have realised that in her condition she can get hurt. At the very least after drugging her he could have kept an eye on her. Anyway, drugging somebody in itself is a criminal offence.
Edited by ships_2006 - 19 years ago