the sinha sisters

Page

shruti bali

@shrutibali

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 20 years ago

isnt it funny that all the 5 sinha sisters may end up getting married in the same household-

kahsish- sujal/piyush

mehek-varun

and now that we know that swayam and akshat are also related to the garewals-

mouli-swayam

charu-akshat

and last but not the least- kanan- aman (since he si the only one left)

its like this is just the only family with boys in shimla

Quote

Frequent Posters

Bhaskar

@Bhaskar.T

Inactive

+ 3

Posted: 20 years ago

😆😆Good One Shruti😆😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

meghana

@rock

Inactive

Posted: 20 years ago

how can ekta show such stupidity yaar if ekta wants our help hum use simla ke cool boys se miladenge.😃

Quote

@pinkish

Inactive

Posted: 20 years ago

sooo nice from u .. i think that what ekta has to do 😆..

Quote

kaleidoscope

@kaleidoscope

Inactive

+ 2

Posted: 20 years ago

Wohooo!!! good one shruti....nice pair matching😆

Quote

fm05

@fm05

Sparkler

Posted: 20 years ago

Lolz. Thts exaclty what Ekta's doing. Good matches😊

Quote

greatmaratha

@greatmaratha

Inactive

+ 2

Posted: 20 years ago

Hye, you should join Ekta's creative team. You do a better job of making couples than her creative team does. At least this way we wont have to see stupid match making happening like it does in her serial.
Her latest idea is to match mihir and Mohini in kyunki. Bizarre isnt it. Please save us from Ekta!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote

*Meg_d*

@*Meg_d*

Inactive

+ 2

Posted: 20 years ago

NOW thats what you call an ekta kapoor serial, the two thing that always happend with sisters and daughters is either she gets the daughters married however after week or so they are back in their parents house living there with no clue where their husband and inlaws are, either all the sisters get married in the same household as she tries to find sons of cg and lalit from no where so she doesnt have to create and introduce a new family for the sisters to get married in😕