Pragiti and blooded related?? blah!

Originally posted by: mysterygurl1427

I get mad whenever pragiti says that she is blood related to Parvati so she is the one who is going to save her. What the??? Why would she say such a thing, i know she is blood related to Parvati, but that is not something Parvati has taught her....who says that only blood related relations are stronger and have the better right?? Wow, man some people are just too much!! No offense to Pragiti lovers, i mean i like her too but its annoyin when she keeps on sayin that over and over again. Adi is not blood related to Paro, but he loved her as his own, doesn't that count?? Isn't that enough to show that he IS part of Paro, and is kinda blooded related. Just like in the Krishna, Yashoda, and Deviki part. Krishna WAS Devki's blood related son, but Yashoda grew him up and took care of him, so does that mean that she is not his mother??

Sorry i just felt like making a different topic on something, please people do comment and let me know how u feel.

if this particular topic has been started before, Please mods lock it up!!! (and I would like to apologise if it did, and me starting another one)😳

Thanks.

Originally posted by: psawyer

And technically, Pragati is NOT related by blood to Parvati. She is related by blood to Om, but Parvati is only related through Om, because Krishna is not her biological son. The only granchild of Parvati's who is related by blood is Ishan.

I do agree that Pragati should not put so much focus on blood - Parvati has never done so; she has always loved her children equally. In fact, even Adi and Aditi should do well to remember that Parvati has never just been "meri Parvati mamma", but in fact, "sabki Parvati mamma".