I completely agree w/ this. Also, what's it w/ Jyoti's moral sense - that it's wrong to adopt out one's kid? Sushma's track was going fine w/o dragging back Brij - she could have given that baby to Sarika (incidentally, where is Sarika now?), aced her exams, done her bachelors and then found a job. Instead, Jyoti emotionally blackmailed her into going back to Brij.
Originally posted by: nams214
Jyoti seems to have double standards. Wasn't Sushma in a similar situation where she wanted to complete her studies and become independent, however it was Jyoti who pushed her to go back to Brij who's crimes are argueably much worse than Pankaj's. So why is it that Jyoti gets to do what she wants but Sushma does what Jyoti wants because Jyoti is always right? (I am in no way questioning Jyoti's decision to be independent-I think it is good to be strong, I'm merely pointing out her inconsistency in dealing with herself with regards to what she prescribes for others.)
But I do think Jyoti shouldn't cut out the possibility of remarriage completely. Being married doesn't mean that she can't still work independently and earn money and support her child, it just means she will have some companionship along the way. And the situation with Kabir is completely different to the first time. Her first marriage was based on lies-it was like a pack of cards that was waiting to come tumbling down. I remember thinking at the time that she should have told Pankaj everything from the start. This time, Kabir knows absolutely everything about her situation and the history of her family-much better basis for a relationship of trust.
Yeah, everything she did wrong w/ Pankaj, she didn't even have to do here - Kabir found out about Pankaj from her, her pregnancy from those guests, Brij from Brij himself (hopefully the whole truth), and he already knows the ugliest things about Jyoti there are to be known. So there is no pre-existing baggage that may one day damage her, the way it did w/ Pankaj (although he's now in repentant mode, and trying to break free from Neelam. This time, I'm on Bhairavi's side).
I do agree w/ some other posters though, that while it's not necessarily true, Kabir may end up not liking Pankaj's kid, or if he has kids of his own, he'll be partial to them over Pankaj's kid. I mean, look @ Padma - Jyoti & Sudha ain't just her step-daughters, they are her
neices, for crying out loud, but for her, they were always golden geese (in Sudha's case, she was a servant while unmarried, and a goose once she married into the Vashists). If Padma can be like that w/ Jyoti & Sudha, why should Jyoti believe that Kabir will be that way w/ Pankaj's kid, who has genetically
nothing in common w/ him?