Mandy dearest,
This script is like a ball of knitting wool with which a kitten has been playing. There is no way now that it can be straightened out.
It is not just the havoc played with the depiction of Akbar/Jalal - though that is by far the most glaring as his is the central character and is supposed to represent one of the greatest personalities of all time. They have turned a great, if ruthless military strategist into a kohl-eyed, ranting maniac. Next they will turn him into a equally maniacal repenting puddle of guilt, with all that kohl running out of his eyes!😉
But it is Jodha as well whose depiction is being twisted and made unbelievably inconsistent from one day to the other.
The woman who was lamenting endlessly about Rajvanshi deaths on Friday was the same one who told Mansingh, during the the attack on the Raja of Panna- that too for precisely the same crime, of sheltering rebels against the Shahenshah - that an enemy is an enemy, whether he is Rajvanshi or Mughal, and that he should be loyal to the Shahenshah. This is such a glaring contradiction that it hits you in the eye. Her whole harping exclusively on Rajvanshis, as against Mughals, on Friday was very distasteful.
I never had any high hopes of this serial for the past several months,but I had thought that they would fudge the fall of Chittor in Feb 1568 (and Ranthambhor in March 1569) by taking a several year leap to August 1569 and Salim. I never thought they would get into this double mess. Now, after Jalal has been re-reformed from a blood-crazed sinner to a great human being in Jodha Begum's
Insanification 2.0, things look set to go completely haywire.
I am waiting to see what they do to "explain" Jalal's attack on Ranthambhor the year after Chittor, though it ended smoothly in just a month, probably thanks to the effect of Chittor. That was in
Feb-March 1569.
And Salim was born on
August 30, 1569, so he must have been in works from early December 1568, that is to say 8 months after Chittor and just before Ranthambhor! What would that say about the Jodha-Jalal relationship post Chittor and pre-Ranthambhor?
So the epiphany at Chittor, if they show one of Jalal repenting furiously and getting back into Jodha Begum's good books, did not stop him, unlike Asoka, from launching more
akaaran aur anuchit wars of conquest. The Hada Raja of Ranthambhor had not done anything against Akbar, not even to the extent of the hostility displayed by Kunwar Pratap, so that campaign was purely for the expansion of the empire. And there must have been at least some Rajvanshi
rakht spilt there as well, at least due to the very heavy cannon fire from the Mughal side. So what is Jodha Begum going to do about that?
Then there was the campaign to conquer Gujarat in 1572, though as I had noted elsewhere, that would presumably not bother Jodha Begum as the dead there on the other side would not be Rajvanshi!
My advice to you, for whatever it is worth, Mandy dearest, is to stop lamenting about the horrendous distortions in this Jalal.
Paani sar ke upar ja chuka hai. Just duck for cover in the week ahead!
Shyamala
Originally posted by: mandyg
hi everyone!
the heading is taken from what my dear forum fellow sandhya had to say about the current state of jalal..and i thought such a beautiful point needs a new thread and this is very much dedicated to my jalal and inspired from my dear sandhya!
jalal became akbar because of jodhaism..why all credits have been given to jodha for all the great deeds he did..and what about his own intelligence..his own capabilities and his own strategies?..he did become secular because he did not believe in one particular religion and respected all..worshiping kahna murti in jodha's hojra is one prime example as muslims are not allowed to worship murtis..but he did which speaks volumes about his greatness and being secular..and i would have appreciated if the show would have handled his being great with bit more logic and yes jodha might have advised him good and must have been really close to him and her involvement i will never shun away but the ultimate decision was only akbar's!
now jalal expanded his empire because he was jallad????..now what sort of a logic is that!..he was an intelligent man and knew what he was doing!..his military strategies were excellent and he did not have to be out of his character or go insane to conquer and win several territories..his actions and his conquers were all well planned and not like shown in the show!
last but not the least he was great..brave..intelligent..and far better than his contemporaries and there was no match to him around his time when he ruled! and i bow down to this great and complete man and a ruler!
all i can say is that i hope and wish ekta to show some traits of real akbar in our reel jalal..pl maam show his intelligence and show his well planned strategies be it war or administration..we want to see it..all we have got so far is twisted interpretation of history and his in and out rounds around the harem