Zeenat is not going any where - Page 55

Originally posted by: blackvelvet

Defence seems to be afflicted by the same malaise as the accused...the inability to speak the truth...

And it is not "a lie"...

But in the plural...LIES...and the said husband is not guilty of breaking any promises as no such promises were ever made...the deal between the accused and her husband was very clear from the start...it did not involve love...and the accused still holds the position of the chief queen...the husband in question has not taken that away from her despite her many misdeeds...and the prosecution is ready with evidence to prove every allegation against the accused...and as you know your honour...everyday new cases are being filed against the accused...so the prosecution has no option but to deal with those cases on a day to day basis...and as the defence has pleaded not guilty, the prosecution requests the defence to place evidence before the court to prove the innocence of their client ..

😊

Originally posted by: elasingh

Thanks Sindhu..I feel that hussein might be poisoned today only. .and story will move fast

Originally posted by: SindhuMenon

I also want the story to move fast but not at the cost of Jo's torture by Ruks..Cant just see that ela..

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">And the prosecution seems to be obsessed with the inability not to distort facts.</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">The husband did make promises, not that he is in love but that my client will be the most important to him in his life. And this repeatedly. Defense can provide with episode references and recordings as proofs. Also when he decided to change equations he kept assuring thay she still remained important all the while provoking her insecurities. 'Jalan hona chaahiye' were his exact words in an episode. After having refused her love after years of marriage, declaring that he had no dil and promting her to follow suit and encouraging her snobbish behaviour saying that he liked it best in her, he has now chosen alternatives. My client reacted with a similar bunch of untruths. It was between husband and wife and their equation. How does that qualify for a crime. All this while the husband has accepted worse insults from his other wife in the name of love.😊</font>

The prosecution has no need to distort facts as the defence is doing an admirable job of that...but the prosecution reiterates that it has sufficient incriminating evidence to establish all allegations against the accused...the prosecution would like to remind the court that the defence has admitted that their client is a liar...the defence has also admitted that there was no love in the relationship between the accused and her husband...the prosecution would like to draw the attention of the court to the fact that the accused had ample time in almost 10years of marriage to win the heart and love of her husband , which she failed to do...however the rajput wife could win the love of the said husband (despite his protestations that he has no dil!) within barely a year of marriage...so what the rajput wife could do in one year, the accused could not do in ten years...your honour it is a futile attempt on part of the defence to blame the husband or the rajput wife for the shortcomings of the accused...

The prosecution would thus like to remind the defence that the said deal between the accused and her husband stands till this day...and the position, power and privileges of the accused remain intact despite her various offences, many of which her husband is aware of but has chosen to forgive and forget in the vain hope that his childhood friend would eventually mend her ways...but that is not to be your honour as is evident from the last (?) offence committed by the accused, that of seperating a new born child from his mother to secure the title of muz...this case is like the proverbial can of worms your honour...the more the prosecution invesstigates the more evidence of offences committed by the accused is unearthed...the prosecution would thus like to request the defence not to waste the time of the court by trying to camouflage the misdeeds of the accused and instead focus on proving with evidence that their client is not guilty of the specific crimes that she has been accused of committing...

Originally posted by: elasingh

Jodha will be blamed dear. .Trust me

Originally posted by: elasingh

Jodha will be blamed dear. .Trust me

Originally posted by: akdhalover

I think spoiler is true

And m not watching unless all this is sorted