When the real blurs with the reel - Page 3

Originally posted by: adianasr

Divs, the problem is that the minute there is a critique it is looked upon as a slur - and ppl resort to 'Vivaad' instead of 'Samvaad'

I have been a TE fan through out - and I became a Rajat fan much later - and I am a thru and thru Akbar fan - for me Jodha is becoz of Akbar and not the other way round.

Unfortunately, ppl take all critiquing of characters and actors personally - which is truly tragic

👏

Originally posted by: elasingh

Great post Divyam...Wont deny that I am a Jo supporter but I have nothing against Khushi's or donjas's post...What bugs me is that ppl think it is OK to critise one and if other is critcized then it is like spreading negativity.. I am matured enough to realise that we need Jallu supporters too ...or the forum will become unipolar having similar kinds of views...and this inability to face critisism of ur favourate actor spells death for debate, new ideas and forum...

Very nice post. Agree a lot with what you say.

Divya much needed post! thanks for making it...🤗

Wow Divi,

A truly brilliant post Divi depicting the sad state of the forum.

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

Very true Divya

👍🏼 for making the post that conveys your views clearly yet doesn't mention names. I am yet to learn that art.😆

IF unfortunately is pro-jo and pro-paridhi. Even Jalal is not spared against her. He shouts at her and he becomes a wife abuser. His only job is to count her hunars and indulge and pamper her. As for the forum waasis criticism becomes sacrilege. Reports warnings and thread closures.

Recently Donjas made a post on his view that he found Rajat's expression not upto the mark. But the replies were only in defense of his expression or acceptance of the post. The thread is still alive. But the post made by Khushi saying that she found Pari inept in some aspects of the show had hues and cries and is already reported for closure.

I think that the Jodhaphiles are so sensitive to criticism as they deeply KNOW that the criticisms may be true afterall. Noother explanation for such hyper-reactivity.

Well I would like to clarify here.

Guys, I don't know what to say ... perhaps, I have not articulated my point.

I am saying- no point is right or wrong ... we all have different ways to evaluate things. I am not even choosing sides. Donjas has every right to criticize RT's acting just like we criticize the CVs, Khushi has every right to make a post questioning the leap and potential drivers of it. Both are subjective- so whether you agree with it or not is what makes you think it is well-written or ridiculous.

Can Donjas state for a fact that Jalal's reaction was the wrong one or can Khushi state for a fact that romantic scenes are the reason for the leap? Nothing is fact here ... it is all up for debate- so how can one debate be okay or another debate be wrong?

We all love the show for different reasons - so what one person views as articulate, positive, appropriate is different. I do not think it makes a difference if you love Jodha more, Jalal more, or both equally - you feel what you feel about the show and specific scenes. Why do we have to be in camps?

Can we not tolerate threads with different points of view? Do you honestly feel that Rajat, Paridhi, or anyone will feel devastated receiving negative feedback? Then the CVs must be in a state of depression if they visit this forum.

Threads are rarely closed because of the discussion topic but because the debate moves from the discussion to the right of individual members to have a POV on the discussion.

Feel free to go against the argument but how can we go against the person who starts the thread or the person making a comment on the threads? That is when it shifts from discussions of the reel on the serial, to the real about individuals.

Perhaps, that is exactly what is happening to me.

Originally posted by: rpeez

Wow Divi,

True!

Beautifully written. 👏

As far as I am concerned, "Ignorance is a bliss", I am blissfully ignorant of things I don't agree with. 😆