First of all, Happy Birthday once again!
I want to repeat what I had written in birthday thread:
I miss you and your posts on JA forum. Your historical threads are my favorite. They were so engaging, interesting and valuable. Because of your threads, I got more interested in history and especially Akbar and MUZ. My love and respect has multiplied for them since I read your threads. Thank you very much for all the effort and hard work (👏)you had put in all these threads.
Now back to closing of your historical threads:
1) I and many other members wanted Your historical threads to be sticky NOT a general thread where it is a chaos. I went there and it was so hard to differentiate the information from questions or doubts.A member who is sharing the info cannot change the title other than former mod. So, it's even harder for members to know what page the info is on and where are the following discussions on it.
Solution: It would have be better if this "Doubts and Discussions about Historical Facts" had just listed the LINKS and titles of historical threads by you and any new/old member. (Members who want to share their historical threads can just post their links and titles and summary of it , if needed. This way there would be no work for MODS either). Then, other members can just click on the link to read if they are interested in that subject. So, this way people can avoid the thread if they are not interested in it due to subject or topic maker.
2) As stated in your posts that few members reported your threads, then I want to know on what basis? Members who reported it because they did not believe the info, Abhay and his co-researchers provided, then WHY didn't they make a comment in the the thread AND provided the reference from authentic records and prove the info wrong by scanning the page and giving references where they got the info from. I am sure if they had brought real proof, then you(Abhay) won't have mind accepting it. But, no what did they do? They reported the threads but did not provide the references which shows they were either bluffing about the info being wrong or assumed it was wrong (in Abhay's historical threads).
3) This show is based on real people so obviously people will be curious to know if it's mentioned in history or not and that is why members have full right to open topic on it or bring that question in historical threads ( whom they trust).
4) If there is a question of bashing or fan wars, then let me say we all used to have cordial discussions on your threads regardless of if one is Jalal fan or jodha fan or Akdha fan. So, I am sure that is not an issue.
5) I completely support RE-OPENING of all historical threads of you (Abhay) and any other member if needed to be open. I hope MODS allow new ones,too. I request MODS to please re-open them.
6) I and many members do not want to be deprived of all the valuable and interesting info you, Kamal, Lizzy and your other co-researchers provided just because of "few" members who reported the thread without proof. WHY should we (MAJORITY) all suffer and be deprived of it?
I pray and hope wholeheartedly that your threads are re-opened and we get to enjoy the fruits of your and other co-researchers' hard work and effort.
Come back soon to forum to share your views!!!
Best Regards,
Ayesha
Edited by ashpat - 11 years ago
