preparation for war-DT NT Pg25 - Page 19

Originally posted by: elasingh

I have called Zee yesterday. .
He told me that jalal will be captured by AM ...when i objected he said mam yudh mein upar neeche toh hota rahta hai. ..

He told me that jalal is smart and playing tricks on his enemies by pretending that he doesn't have enough army

He told me maham will be exposed. ..

Originally posted by: elasingh

I have called Zee yesterday. .
He told me that jalal will be captured by AM ...when i objected he said mam yudh mein upar neeche toh hota rahta hai. ..

He told me that jalal is smart and playing tricks on his enemies by pretending that he doesn't have enough army

He told me maham will be exposed. ..

Originally posted by: elasingh

Mandyg i too have no objections showing harem ladies fight but to butcher jalal's character to such extent is wrong. .

Long back i had written that this is male centric story and if they try to change the character of the story they will end up destroying it. ...

Worse it is a real story not a fiction. .

Originally posted by: Cleo12345

Sandhya, thanks for agreeing with me that Maharana Pratap was glory personified. I am certain that 99% of Indian population agrees with both of us on this.

But what about Akbar? Not sure why you are asking ME this question...Read my comment again Sandhya...and this time pay attention...Did I say that I like Akbar being misportrayed in any show?...I did not post my response when someone questioned the misportrayal of Akbar in the other show...my post was in response to the comment on MP...i made sure that i clarify it ...So I am unable to understand why are you questioning me about Akbar...you should direct your question to the person( if any) who says that he/ she enjoys watching Akbar as a wimpy king or as a psycho devil. My reply to your post ends here.

Now...i fail to understand this kind of love for historical characters. We are not satisfied that the person we admire was great...he has to be the greatest...Why?...why can't two great men co exist? ...if MP was great, then Akbar wasnt or if Akbar was great then Ashoka wasn't is something that Is beyond my mental faculties to comprehend...if the show makers are doing a shabby job of portraying any one of them, does it give us the license to question the greatness of other historical characters? ...absolutely not. Complain about the show makers...complain about the misportrayal ...why take out the frustration on other historical characters? Infact, I agree with Adiansar here...if people are so unhappy with the the characterization of Akbar, then complain to the right authorities so that changes can be made and production houses and channels learn a lesson that they can't take history for granted...we feel bad about the portrayal of characters but dont want to let go of the guilty pleasure...and taking out our frustration by bashing a respected historical character is so much easier.

If anyone has a problem with misportrayal of Akbar in another show, please discuss it on the other show's forum...Or else you'll get this thread closed...if you still insist on venting about another show on this forum...by all means...do it till the mods allow it...kindly leave revered historical characters like Maharana Pratap out of it. Thanks.😊

Originally posted by: ayushimehra

Diksha, No video Link, only Wriiten, update,

Originally posted by: ---Khushi---

I was much disappointed with the war sequence...very ordinary setting...

Also, I thought there used to be some protocols for war...like, kings fought only kings, n ditto for all other ranks...here, Jalal was fighting with just about anybody 😕 ...somebody correct me if I'm wrong...

N was Akbar the Great actually so dumb?!?!...I mean, seriously...😆

(PS: I hope that this time Even KAANHA should not stop Jallu from finishing off KAANA 😉 )