Ruqaiya - the Forgotten Enigma - Page 5

now I am bore I m watching old show Akbar the great... despit of old show and some not perfacr acting that show has grip on story... Rajput are also good in tht show and Mughals r also good ... maham anga, adham shared=fudin r bad in that story...the story is very understandable...here every thing is confused because of border ine...dahshat hae Akbar ka dusra naam kaise bane gi jodha ose insaan" this line is crap in itself... ven in movie jodha did vital part in reformation of Governing principles but jalal was bever hallad or haiwan... secondly in the name of fiction taking so much liberty... if you r showing Midvale period fiction or not tou cant spoil the essence of that perod you just spoil the feeling of that era... the kings like Akbar had so much to do in their life... they cant afford to put their heart feelings on the top... and at that time pologamy was so common ...they share good relation with them and those also shared good relation with each other... there is need of portraying utter mnegativity in Rauqayya and so much saint of Jodha..

Originally posted by: PallaviDas003

I think 3 is the lucky number for Ekta, that's why everything at a time comprised with 3 persons..First 3 villains Bk,MA,Jalal..then all of a sudden Jalal changed into a saint almost and BK's death.So Ekta needs '3' vamps at a time and she brings Adham Khan in scene and turns Ruqu in vamp, '3' most important persons in Jalal's life-BK,MA,Ruqu, '3' persons Jalal listens to MA,Hamida,Ruqu.. Its all a magical digit that's playing a vital role here i.e 3..even Jodha's repeating dialogue 'Jalal ka Sar' also consists of '3' words...😆

'

Originally posted by: libran90

Woh kahawat to suna hoga na..."Teen Tigada...Kaam bigada"

I don't think its because of the creative liberties the CVs are taking with the show. They are forgetting what their characters are all about. The essence of the characters keeps changing! Where is the jallad in Jalal? Aur kitna insan banaegi Jodha usse? He is such a nice person already! She seems like an irritating person demanding her head all the time. The relationship between him and Ruqaiya is so ruined cuz of the different portrayals of the character The CVs should atleast remain true to what they created, if they can't be true to reality

Originally posted by: smile.sara

now I am bore I m watching old show Akbar the great... despit of old show and some not perfacr acting that show has grip on story... Rajput are also good in tht show and Mughals r also good ... maham anga, adham shared=fudin r bad in that story...the story is very understandable...here every thing is confused because of border ine...dahshat hae Akbar ka dusra naam kaise bane gi jodha ose insaan" this line is crap in itself... ven in movie jodha did vital part in reformation of Governing principles but jalal was bever hallad or haiwan... secondly in the name of fiction taking so much liberty... if you r showing Midvale period fiction or not tou cant spoil the essence of that perod you just spoil the feeling of that era... the kings like Akbar had so much to do in their life... they cant afford to put their heart feelings on the top... and at that time pologamy was so common ...they share good relation with them and those also shared good relation with each other... there is need of portraying utter mnegativity in Rauqayya and so much saint of Jodha..

you can make a 3 hr movie on fake love of real historical characters but you just can make a serial for year or two. you just cant incorporate real incident of a very successful king of real history whose life was full of happening with totally fake love story in a very long TV show...

that's why they are confuse... only for 1 fiction love story they are trying to distort the whole lot real historical figures... which is very difficult... e.g Akbar has a court but doing all decisions in harem with MA... bec they will show in future the Jodha part in his decision which she can only do in harem... and how can eunuch enter in king/queen private chamber without permission sp when the shahansha is out bursting in grave.

so much creative mistake and when we point out people start to bash ... fictional show ...disclaimer ...bla bla.. I m just watching tthis show only in love of Rajat lets see how much I can bear.

Truly. Its so irritating to see a good show make stupid blunders! 😡

Originally posted by: PallaviDas003

👏 ..kaam bigad na suru bhi ho chuka hai..😉

I just hope right now that if someone from this forum is in contact with the CVs or does know anyone from Ek's creative team, please convey our message not to butcher a enigmatic historical figure so much..😡..

I think if anyone was, they would have inundated them with calls and messages the time when the protests were in full swing. Damn those CVs, they should come here and read the analysis and comments to better their show!

Originally posted by: smile.sara

n

ye.g Akbar has a court but doing all decisions in harem with MA... bec they will show in future the Jodha part in his decision which she can only do in harem... and how can eunuch enter in king/queen private chamber without permission sp when the shahansha is out bursting in grave.

so much creative mistake and when we point out people start to bash ... fictional show ...disclaimer ...bla bla.. I m just watching tthis show only in love of Rajat lets see how much I can bear.

Originally posted by: Super Kool

Add one more to the list...'jalal ka toh dil hi nai hai'..one has to be blind to miss the fact that jalal has a well functioning heart...bk, mm, ruqaiya, Abdul, his loyalists eg zaheer...he values/valued them all...And still jalal is 'heartless'...

'

What was called as petticoat govt?? The decisions in harem or court??