Rangeela: Biased towards Salman and Karishma? - Page 4

Originally posted by: mythil

agree

Originally posted by: -Sneha6-

Rangeela's been known to be forever biased.

What pissed me off is that Salman is good, I expect good acts. It's just been a constant graph with no growth whatsoever. You aren't competing with others, you're already above them, compete with yourself!

I feel as if a lot of these 'dancers' from DID, once they become bigger stars, kind of let go of the 'dancing' aspect of their talent. Which is extremely unfortunate. Look at Kunwar Amar, look at Salman, even Dharmesh you hardly see him on stage performing. I get that movies/TV shows are interesting, but still. So they kind of lose their touch with dance. The only two people I see actively doing workshops or promoting dance on the forefront seem to be Shakti and Raghav.

That's what seems to have happened with Salman in my opinion. He might have become a way better performer, but his fineness in dancing is kind of losing out on the whole stardom business.

Originally posted by: rbpll

Exactly my point. And she didn't even choreograph her own acts unlike Salman. It's not as if Aishwariya is choreographing those acts!

Originally posted by: foreverlazy

<font face="Comic Sans MS, Times, serif" size="2" color="#660033">Of course.🤢</font>

<font face="Comic Sans MS, Times, serif" size="2" color="#660033">But I'd prefer Tanna over Salman to be honest with you...</font>

Originally posted by: -Sneha6-

Rangeela's been known to be forever biased.

What pissed me off is that Salman is good, I expect good acts. It's just been a constant graph with no growth whatsoever. You aren't competing with others, you're already above them, compete with yourself!

I feel as if a lot of these 'dancers' from DID, once they become bigger stars, kind of let go of the 'dancing' aspect of their talent. Which is extremely unfortunate. Look at Kunwar Amar, look at Salman, even Dharmesh you hardly see him on stage performing. I get that movies/TV shows are interesting, but still. So they kind of lose their touch with dance. The only two people I see actively doing workshops or promoting dance on the forefront seem to be Shakti and Raghav.

That's what seems to have happened with Salman in my opinion. He might have become a way better performer, but his fineness in dancing is kind of losing out on the whole stardom business.

Originally posted by: rbpll

Absolutely right👍🏼...I mean considering the accomplishments of Salman as a dancer , he has given either mediocre or average performances. Look at Shakti in JDJ 7 , she has given some power packed performances.

Originally posted by: -Sneha6-

Well, with Tushar as her choreographer, there was no need for her to choreograph her own acts. But even if she wasn't paired up with Tushar, I don't think that Shakti is the type of person to choreograph her own acts. 😊

Edited by foreverlazy - 8 years ago

Originally posted by: ShikhaAgrawal

agree tanna is slightly better thn body showing salman

Originally posted by: tctctc

I feel nowadays they r biased towards Shan. His last performance didnt deserve 30. Dance was very simple. His solo was really good. But Suleiman was best n Suleiman deserved 30 not shan

Shan should have got 27 or 28.