There shouldn't be a Wildcard Entry!!!! - Page 3

Originally posted by: jyoti06

I think u hv already answered my question here😉...Obviously if Mika or Sonali would hv got out then there would hv been NO wild card round because then the eliminations would hv been fair as they both deserved to go out instead of Sudhaji and Prachi😊...But unfortunately that was not the case..the eliminations hv been highly UNFAIR and even the channel people knows it..so this wild card round is introduced to give one more chance to a TRUE and DESERVING Talent😊

Otherwise tell me would u prefer to watch a JDJ final with Mika and Sonali as the two Finalists?😕

I wouldn't call the elimination of Prachi and Sudha "UNFAIR", but unreasonable, as they both are better dancers and performers then Mika and Sonali... But we can not ignore the fact that they did get low audince votes (though I heard speculations that the channel was favoring Sonali cause it was her birthday... not sure how true it is)... and being FAIR to everyone we should accept it. If anyone should be blame its "US" the "Public" to be blame as we are voting and supporting the weaker talented dancers... we are voting for them more for their popularity then talent.

Also if the Sony TV has decided to intoduce a wildcard round why not do it for all the contestants? Why ONLY Prachi and Sudha? Mini and Tapur were better dancers then Mika and didn't deserve to go out so soon... they could have stayed in the compitition and improved on their perfomances... but they weren't even considered...

The Channel is being completly biased towards Prachi, and Sudha... if they do it for one or two contestants they should do it for all... Why bend the rules for them only? If that was the case then why even have a compitition? Just hand over the award to whom they consider deserving..

To be honest, I am against wildcards in most situations. Many great dancers have been voted out so I can understand the dissatisfaction. But wouldn't have been more fair to ask all of the eliminated jodis to perform and compete for the wildcard instead of just 2?

Originally posted by: cinnamonrani

To be honest, I am against wildcards in most situations. Many great dancers have been voted out so I can understand the dissatisfaction. But wouldn't have been more fair to ask all of the eliminated jodis to perform and compete for the wildcard instead of just 2?

i was thinking the same thing, they were all voted out so should have a fair chance of reentering the competition like in nach baaliye rather than picking from the top 2

Originally posted by: Chris.Khanna

so would dat mean dat all the other shows dat have a wild card round is playing favortism?

if it took Prachi being eliminated to bring a change in the format of the show wut is wrong wid dat? jdj has neva been fair, even last yr so i'm glad dat dis year they realize dat there should be a change.

da only reason dey didn't seriously consider a wild card before is becuz the public neva made enough noise till prachi was eliminate so its unfair fo ppl to say dat sony is doin in becuz of prachi. sony is doin it becuz the ppl who watch jdj in India are demanding it. read the articles dat came out, read the threads on dis forum

Hmm , i disagree with what you say , most reality shows in India have their formats of the shows based on voting. Every time people are always heard complaining that the best should win , on a very rare occasion have i seen the best contestants win . You can tell by the results on some of the reality shows such as Indian Idol - prashant Tamang won , Fame Gurukul - Qazi won. In my opinion they werent the best , but they still won. I dont think sony realized since Prachi got voted out , they need to change the format of the show. Remember they are doing business here they know that Prachi's popularity derives alot of votes , if they can succeed in keeping her till the end its more beneficial to them then it is to the viewers. I remeber in Indian Idol they came up with something similar to the wild card entry and managed to get both Amit and Ankita in . In my opinion , i am not impressed with the way Prachi has managed to accept her being voted out. I believe its extremely unfair !Sony chose Sudha against her as they very well know Prachi is going to win .

I agree no wildcard , what is the point, i dont understand. it is juntas votes and judges points combine together decides who is at the bottom, so dont understand why they keep bringing the wildcard thing. it is unfair in the competition all together.

too bad her fans didnt vote for her and she is out. does not make sense to give few contenstants second chance and not the other.

i dont like the whole notion of wildcard.

I like sa re ga ma pa, where judges were deciding who will go further, to get the top 10 candidates, and then afterwards a brahama-ashtra round was there, where people votes decided who among the eliminated contenstant ( the ones who couldnt make it to top 10 ) should come back, this was more sensible since peoples votes was not deciding who would be in the top 10.

once people votes are deciding, does not make sense to ask them again who should come back. unfair i think to other candidates who are still alive in the competition

i dnt understand y the wild card entry has been included..its very clear that anyhow they want prachi desai to get into the show.....its trully unfair.i can sense its work of ekta camp for sure.....then wats wrong with other eliminated contestants...y r they not allowed to get entry thru wild card????i am very dissapointed with this new sudden changes.....i am not against prachi but the support and such changes r very unhealthy....wen u r eliminted then just go out or hav equal fair chances......i will never vote for any1 especially prachi

This wild card entry is so unnecesary and it is soo unfair to the other contestants why should these two(prachi and sudha)get a second chance?

i'm anti wildcard round. if one is eliminated...he/she is eliminated...he/she lost...there is no reason 2 try 2 make losers feel better...yeh like sudha & prachi r gud dancerz but they lost coz their fanz didn't vote enough for them to move to the next round...but other celebz whose fanz have voted & have the celebz move to the next round shouldnt be penalized.

i think the wild card is just to get people to watch the show and get the trps up...thats wat im guessing ..coz i doubt alot of people watch jdj2 coz theres shows like nach baliye and others im guessing...but i think its pathetic coz its not fair to the remaining contestants bcoz there working so hard ...

It is wrong to have a wild card round, specially when one is made on the basis of clout and power than actual format. It is also unfair to remaining contestants who have worked hard to stay in the race.

Then again were some of the contestants who were eliminated deserveing to get eliminated. Are all the contestants still in genuinely hardworking and deserving to be in. How fair is the blatant disrespect and disregard to talent and effort.

How wrong really it is to bend the rules to do the right thing. If the law allows a criminal to get away, then nothing wrong in bending the law.

Or is life simply black and white.