sushant didn't derserve 30.

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Sonakshi

@EatPrayLove

Explorer

Posted: 14 years ago

#31

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

I don't think being a Sushant fan had anything much to do with finding the performance emotional, cos I read good reviews about it even from some who are not really his pankhas. My hostel girls too cried on seeing the performance (they didn't know he had lost his Mom, I told this to them.) My Mom who is definitely not Sushant's fan and my sis who has never seen Pavitra Rishta (she thinks its boring) too were impressed by this act.
Even Ragini, Madhuri, Malaika, Mona were crying on the set as well.

In short, I simply feel the performance clicked for some, and didn't click for some, some could connect to it and some could not. As simple as that.😊

Agree. That is what it boils down to end. And maybe you're right about #green , coz even my aunt was kind of sobbing in the end, though the rest of us weren't. It all depends upon one's own opinion, outlook and preferences.

@All: We may disagree with the judges points or feel the scoring was erratic, but i don't think it is fair to call the judges biased or something cos of that. They did point out Sushant's mistakes in his next performance and give him less marks cos of that. I think the judges are pretty unbiased, purely my opinion.

Well, I did not mean "biased" as in "always biased". I just felt that at this particular time their judgment, atleast according to me, was kind of erratic. My fault, wrong choice of adjective! And I felt they were erratic coz generally they do deduct marks for a performance that is not upto one's standards.
Oh well, it's all subjective in the end. No point in discussing. I agree with you, I don't think the judges are "biased", they're just wrong sometimes. :-)

Edited by EatPrayLove - 14 years ago

Quote

digitalone 33

@digitalone 33

Rocker

Posted: 14 years ago

#32

full too agree on it
i was going to start the thread but you did it
was perfect even i think the same only

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

digitalone 33

@digitalone 33

Rocker

Posted: 14 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: --Rachna--
Really? 😆 Then how much did he deserve? 😛

from my side 24 is more then enough
but only 21 for sure for this performance
not 30 he dont deserve that

Quote

prettywomen22

@prettywomen22

Dazzler

Posted: 14 years ago

#34

didn't see the perfromance so can't comment,,, but he has been constantly scoring high marks... hope he keeps his feet firm on ground and doesn't get carried away

Quote

Rachna

@--Rachna--

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

#35

Originally posted by: digitalone 33

from my side 24 is more then enough
but only 21 for sure for this performance
not 30 he dont deserve that

Are you kidding me? 😲 21 is given to a performance which was average or even below average. Are you saying his performance was average only? 🤔 His performance was the BEST and did deserve a 30

I think you're saying this because you don't like Sushant 😛 Oh well, it doesn't matter cause you're not the judge 😃

Quote

zainab rajput

@beauty_cool

Explorer

Posted: 14 years ago

#36

sushant rocks....he deserved 30 plus....

Quote

TheUltimate

@TheUltimate

Navigator

Posted: 14 years ago

#37

Some of these Sushant's "fans" are so much deep in trouble. It is apparent in this thread. Multiple people have continually suggested that Sushant deserved more than 30 or 30+.

Breaking news!! 30 is the highest score available per performance. So, if someone said he did not deserve 30, it implicitly means that he deserved less than 30. Sorry, I had to spell it out for you guys.

Quote

Divya

@-SushitaLover-

Voyager

Posted: 14 years ago

#38

he deserved 30 or more than that

Quote

112642

Suspended

Posted: 14 years ago

#39

@EatPrayLove and ALL.: i have noticed that judges have had a erratic form of judging. I think its because, either they start marking high, then give low scores. or start marking low and give high marks.

Its pretty obvious that I think sushant deserved a 30. As a performance, that is. it had all the aspects: dance ( i know he has done it before, but it was FLAWLESS), emotional quotient( some were moved, others werent), acting ( his pain and the conveying of emotions were there). so, on the whole it was a perfect-worthy performance.

there are two ascpects:

1) comparing this performance to his other acts: so, i think that they wanted to keep it simple and let the whole performance do its talking.

2) comparing it to the other performances: that week, ragini GOT a perfect (whether it was deserved or not, is irrevalant). was her DANCING perfect? No. her classical steps were off, but madhuri DIDNT comment it, being a trained dancer. it was the WHOLE act, the fun element that wowed the judges and thus she got a 30. again the concept was innovative and attention grabbing.

in the same way: sushant's act, was emotional, relatable to judges who were MOVED by the performance and the transisition of sushant as a carefree boy to a troubled soul, was done fantastically.

many performances that have got 30, by other contestants,havent been ONLY for the dancing, it was the mood , the concept, acting, emotions they conveyed etc. thus it was the WHOLE performance as such.

like other members pointed out, he made madz, mona, ragz cry, and for him,it was such a tough performance, a self-test, an act that came FROM the SOUL, it was beautiful.

eatpraylove: you said, sushant is more popular: i think ragini is equally popular, so is salyana, but it is ONLY sushant( with ankita) who have been targeted more. I understand that his scoring, has made other fans think he shouldnt get perfects all the time, but for sure he has been targeted more than any other contestant.

again, our opinons are different. i dont expect you to agree with my views or opnions. i def, think judges have been quite erratic with their marking. but just wanted to shed some light on why I think he got 30.

Edited by tiya229 - 14 years ago

Quote

Shikha

@lunza

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 14 years ago

#40

Actually I dont think the judges get swayed by the emotional quotient of the performance and give high marks if it does not have enough dancing .. There have been at least three other emotional performances which got the judges teary eyed .. but all of them were criticized for not having enough dancing ...
So I dont think sushant got a 30 only for making everyone cry ...
I felt it was a right mix of dance and acting/emotions...
And i thought the idea of using clouds ( heaven) was a brilliant way of conceptualization ...

Edited by lunza - 14 years ago

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10

sushant didn't derserve 30. - Page 4

Related Topics

Explore Topics