Sushant Singh Rajput too hot to handle?(TB) - Page 8

@*woh ajnabee*

Originally posted by: tiya229

I know😃 lets agree to disagrree before things get ugly.

If two people are mature enough to have a discussion without letting things get personal then there is no need for things to get ugly, so no worries there. As we will just continue going in a round circle here, no point to continue the discussion further, I agree. :)

One thing that I will say though regarding preventive measures is that with the amount of popularity that one sees for Sushant and Ankita on this forum, and the household popularity that these soap stars have to begin with, I would also not think that Ankita would be eliminated this early - perhaps Sushant thought the same. The whole preventive measures thinking is taking things a bit too far in my opinion. And Sushant was actually a very poor performer in Zara Nachke Dikha, in my opinion, but that's irrelevant.

Originally posted by: soul_angel

So whats so rude in saying that we are going in circles? That you got so hurt and your tone certainly changed and you started crying? Bohoo Dont say something that you can't carry foward how far you wanna carry it to Himalayas? when I said you are entitled to your opinion and that very much ends everything on a happy note when I am being his fan doesn't jump on you if you say something about him. Oh I am very important in my world atleast I am not some stranger 😛 Well you are as unoticeable to me too like any other Tom Dick & Harry who just likes messing around and enjoys saying things even after knowing some people wont like it I know that feeling very well cause I am an experienced player in that game so if you think I belong to those Fan girls you are clearly mistaken.

When I clearly said that you can think and say about him whatever you want to then why the hell you started this fangirl argument from me? See I very well know what you are trying to do here but sorry honny you're knocking the wrong door 😛

And I'll respond wherever I want too and did I even once responded to anything you said about Sushant Did I ? I was just stating my opinion in a fun way you are the one who started talking to me by replying to my post in the first place.

Oh you clearly dont even know the meaning of Tit for Tat too No problemo I'll help you out in comprehending well Tit for Tat means when you make someone taste their own medicine by paying back what he or she gave you I just returned your Kukukuuuus back to you 😛

And if you're not getting my drifting then stop playing with fire Bachon Ka kaam nahi hai and go smell your supposed smoke.

Anywho I am in no mood to carry this further you seem to like moving foward with things so carry on 🥱

EDIT: Oh sweety you didn't have to edit your post and add those three lines more to your post 😆 I get it you must have got angry again reading my post again and then must have thought you didn't answer me back properly Koi baat nahi hota hai hota hai 😆

What are you - some 12 year old whiny little girl who can't have a proper debate so makes personal remarks about people? Yeah, I certainly don't play those games, so find someone else to entertain yourself.

Originally posted by: tiya229

@*woh ajnabee*

"You can blame the media for transforming something small and meaningless into big and controversial, but you can't say that they are creating these matters on their own and pulling stuff out of their butt. They need something to go off of to do that. "

this caught my eye. there are two different things here. media is wrong if they take something small, and change the face of it, give it another meaning.

ex: sushant was upset when ankita was eliminated. TRUE

media: sushant was soo upset that ankita got eliminated, that he stormed off the sets, broke thinngs, yelled at everyone his way. FALSE. media is quite clearly making things up here, stretching the truth and de-facing the truth.

now to the smoke without fire

ex: sushant was upset when ankita was in bottom three TRUE

media: sushant was upset that ankita got eliminated. FALSE

there is a difference in both scenarios. smoke without fire stretching the truth to give it another meaning are two different things

Okay, even if we agree that what you said is true, you're still forgetting one point here. How would the channel (or anyone) know that Sushant was upset if he didn't express that in some way? That's what we're referring to when we say no smoke without fire. Something must have happened on the sets.

woh-ajnabee -- read my post on page 7 .. where i have given my reasons on why it feels so unbelievable to me that sushant is capable of all this..

Ahahaha Somebody needs to go back and read her own posts and then say who was getting personal first by saying think twice before you say blah blah aur ab burayi sune ki adat daal lo blah blah hello who are you to tell me what to do and not ? I was talking very cooly by respecting everyone's opinion but someone started getting personal so I did the same see I like to keep things equal :)

Originally posted by: *Woh Ajnabee*

Okay, even if we agree that what you said is true, you're still forgetting one point here. How would the channel (or anyone) know that Sushant was upset if he didn't express that in some way? That's what we're referring to when we say no smoke without fire. Something must have happened on the sets.

@nikita....THAT's what I have been saying too...for all we know the so called source of this whole situation could be a chai wala from JDJ sets who was looking for a quick way to make cash....and the way Sushant is I can seriously believe that convo taking place and the whole thing taken out of context

Originally posted by: *Woh Ajnabee*

Okay, even if we agree that what you said is true, you're still forgetting one point here. How would the channel (or anyone) know that Sushant was upset if he didn't express that in some way? That's what we're referring to when we say no smoke without fire. Something must have happened on the sets.