Sushant Singh Rajput too hot to handle?(TB) - Page 3

Originally posted by: Rapier

This certainly does explains why Ankita has been brought back. I mean I thought that the show bent their rules to bring back Ankita. But now i can see that they were forced to bend their rules. wohi toh main sochoon. how come they decided to bring back 2 wild card entries? this answers my question. and naturally, sushant won't admit to this. so obviously he is gonna deny the news. but this does help put the puzzle pieces together.

Originally posted by: ekta_salman

uhhhhh forget it .... logic seems subjective over here😃

With popularity comes controversies...& in sushant's case it's false accusations. 👎🏼 If they want to promote JDJ, they can do it in a better way than just spreading rumours.

Love u sushant.

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

I can suggest easier alternatives why Ankita was brought back:

1.) Judges thought she was good.

2.) Sony wanted TRP's cos of sushant and ankita.

3.) Sony didn't want to take Krushna back cos he spoke against the channel.

Sushant has NO SHOWS on Sony. He is a telly star for God's sake!!! How can he have more authority than the judges on the show? He cannot just threaten the channel that he will quit and channel will bring Ankita back for his sake. And then judges will give him 30 without any resentment and praise Ankita as well.

As they say, "there is no smoke without fire." 😉

@ Ekta, I think you're being unfair now. When the media writes about Salman, you go on talking about how there is no possibility of truth in those articles, and how no one else can have another point of view because you know him personally and it's all false. It's unfair to say that this article is definitely true in that case. I am giving a dual point of view in this case because I am not sure.

Originally posted by: Rapier

As they say, "there is no smoke without fire." 😉

Originally posted by: Priyanka_AAIICH

@ Ekta, I think you're being really unfair now. When the media writes about Salman, you go on talking about how there is no possibility of truth in those articles, and how no one else can have another point of view because you know him personally and it's all false. It's unfair to say that this article is definitely true in that case. I am giving a dual point of view in this case because I am not sure.

HONESTLY, I am a REALLY big Sushant fan, but I also do know that he gets fumed up fast, and it's possible that he slapped the canteen guys. I don't know if he has become arrogant or what, and I wouldn't want to believe so without real cited proof. I wonder whether the media would write random police stuff...It could be true, but then again it COULD BE FALSE because the media writes all kinds of random talks. The other day they said that Shahrukh was partying the failure of TMK! ROFL. Funniest thing I've heard. I don't know if this article is true or not. I would be really sad if it's true,but I hope it's not. I am no one to say anything, but yeah, I think it's unfair for people to say that media is 100 % true for Sushant's case, but other times it's false.

P.S- REMEMBER the PEACE THREAD guys. At the end of the day, all this shouldn't even matter. We're watching a show. We should just let it entertain us, and not take over our lives. LOL yes, as fans people become too involved and that's the human tendency, but no point of arguing with each other over that. What's true is true. What's true is unknown. There's no absolute truth= I think that's the only truth in the world. 😆 Therefore, no offence to anyone or anything. :)

uhhhhhhhhhhhhh i never said this article to be true dont try inventin things now i dunno why are u namin me on ur pov post and sorry but bringin salman here just made me well mad .. dont see the point .. there have been two articles about salman so far one was the dating where salman himself said theyre not and one was the injury where again he said he needed an operation so both articles were bullshit and i never said they were wrong cuz i know him 🤢

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

Well, the media is not exactly being pleasant to him right now, is it? They can brew up the smoke and even the fire when they want.Right now, negative articles are suddenly dropping from the sky. I cannot say for sure which are true and which are not, but this one certainly does not have logic, according to me. A telly star does not get so much bhaav in the Telly World. Actors are considered replaceable commodities. Sushant would be thrown out if he ever behaved in such a manner.

And anyway, it is possible for him to quit? Aren't these celebrities in contract with the show?

Threatening to quit would be a foolish decision. He would only end up losing the prize money after coming so close to winning it.

what amazes me is that when we read other articles containing krushna's tiff with sony or any other random information, we tend to believe it. but when it comes to our favs, we dismiss it enirely saying it is completely rubbish. now i cannot do that. i cannot dismiss this article. maybe its true and maybe its not. but i have the word from a journalist against the word from the culprit himself and his devotees. so which do i believe? granted that, journalists are not always accurate. but they cannot "make up" some random cock and bull stories. they surely can exaggerate and take things outta context. but making stuff up is quite hard to believe. that's why i said, "there is no smoke without fire." but this piece of news sorta explains the happenings of the last few weeks. maybe the news is a little exaggerated, but i do not believe it is made up.

and as far as sony giving bhaav to this actor, neither do u nor i know what sony does or how it operates. maybe they did listen to him. maybe they brought back ankita on their own and sushant had nothing to do with it. i don't know why sushant or ankita is important for sony. maybe they are not important at all. i don't know the truth. but i choose to believe things that seem right to me. and i have no problem in believing that sushant is capable of going as far as threatening sony to get his lady love back.

Originally posted by: ekta_salman

uhhhhhhhhhhhhh i never said this article to be true dont try inventin things now i dunno why are u namin me on ur pov post and sorry but bringin salman here just made me well mad .. dont see the point .. there have been two articles about salman so far one was the dating where salman himself theyre not and one was the injury where again he said he needed an operation so both articles were bullshit and i never said they were wrong cuz i know him 🤢

Originally posted by: Rapier

what amazes me is that when we read other articles containing krushna's tiff with sony or any other random information, we tend to believe it. but when it comes to our favs, we dismiss it enirely saying it is completely rubbish. now i cannot do that. i cannot dismiss this article. maybe its true and maybe its not. but i have the word from a journalist against the word from the culprit himself and his devotees. so which do i believe? granted that, journalists are not always accurate. but they cannot "make up" some random cock and bull stories. they surely can exaggerate and take things outta context. but making stuff up is quite hard to believe. that's why i said, "there is no smoke without fire." but this piece of news sorta explains the happenings of the last few weeks. maybe the news is a little exaggerated, but i do not believe it is made up.

and as far as sony giving bhaav to this actor, neither do u nor i know what sony does or how it operates. maybe they did listen to him. maybe they brought back ankita on their own and sushant had nothing to do with it. i don't know why sushant or ankita is important for sony. maybe they are not important at all. i don't know the truth. but i choose to believe things that seem right to me. and i have no problem in believing that sushant is capable of going as far as threatening sony to get his lady love back.

the difference between Krushna's articles and this article is that Krusha's articles had quotes AND he himself had admitted to a lot of things....here the case is different...we have NO proof, no quotes, no pictures, no video, no audio tape of him.....none of the celebs are even quoted....we dont have believable proof that Sushant did these things and Sony kept them both in so its hard to believe this article.....and even with the Krushna thing....when the first article came out I didnt believe it bc Krushna never seemed like the guy who would chase controversies...but who knows Kasmira must have influenced him

the article says "our source says", "according to our source"....now that can be anyone can't it....it could be the chai wala on the JDJ set who decided to say "hey let me say some crap about this guy and maybe I'll get some extra money from the journos" and some journos being the over ecxited beings they are jumped at the opportunity and wrote it...


I'm not saying that I don't completely believe it....who knows maybe Sushant did do these things....BUT what bothers me is that why would an international production house like BBC take crap from Sushant?? who exactly is he?? he isnt the channel honcho....or a big politicians son right...he's just a telly actor...who is on a RIVAL channel, so if he did do these things they would have kicked him out in a fraction of a second right??


and going by nikita's point....IF this was done...then why the hell would celebs like Chang,Ragini,Yana and Mahi just sit there and take the crap....arent they part of the compeition too??? dont they have a right to say hey this is unfair dont do this?? I'm prettu sure none of them are that dumb to not stand up for themselves



for me this case is like innocent until proven guilty...until we have some solid proof that Sushant said this...I am not going to believe this article