it wasn't a fair decision!!!!!!! - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

26

Views

3.5k

Users

20

Likes

80

Frequent Posters

-desigirl- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#11

NONE of them should have been back

no one bet salyaana and only them deserved it
whts up with changin the rules to make the "2nd best" selected too
and yes if they did choose two it sure must have been yaana and krushna
112642 thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#12
saw krushna performance again and again. i felt that after the week of hip-hip with remo, this wasnt hip-hop at its best. it was just lot of high energy steps. the lifts, throws were quite akward and little to mininmal locking and popping. there is about 5 seconds of locking and popping, a bit of street.
compartively, i thought punit and ankusha's hip-hop was better, with lots of L and P with street as well. aslo their performance flowed well and looked good.

i am not saying krushna didnt do well, he did a good job with his choreography, but the above points cannot be neglected.

coming to ankita's performance. her dance form was indian contempary, for which her choreography did absolute justice. i am not a dancer but after researching on youtube, and internet, i can tell that her lifts, spins, stretch of her arms were abosultely right. her choreo did it. indian classical dance is also considered to be form of contempary dance. do really nishant did a fusion of indian and modern dance forms on a mythological subject.
overall, technality wise, this was stronger and better.

bozo thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#13

It's fair enough. There is no best answer, they had to choose any 2.

Daya, Shekar, Mahi should have been eliminated first based on the judges scores.
Rapier thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: blyton

It was definitely unfair. They changed the format to favour one person over another. Either it should not have been changed at all, or changed to favour both.



yes exactly and this is why it bothers me!
gill1 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#15
IT WAS NOTTTTT AN UNFAIR DECISION...
WE ALL KNOW THAT YANA AND SALMAN DEFINITELY DESERVED TO COME BACK...
BUT ABOUT ANKITA, IT'S NOT UNFAIR EITHER...
KRISHNA HAS ALWAYS BEEN A DANCER..HE'S BEEN IN SOO MANY DANCE SHOWS LIKE NACH BALIYE ETC. BUTTTTT STILL, IN WILD CARD PERFORMANCE, ANKITA WAS BETTER.... KRISHNA'S PERFORMANCE LOOKED GOOD BECAUSE..
1) MUSIC WAS HYPHY
2) HIP-HOP IS ENERGETIC DANCE AND IS SUPPOSED TO PUMP UP THE CROWD
.... .SOOOO IF YOU WATCH THE EPISODE AGAIN, YOU'LL SEE THAT THERE WERE ALOTTTT OF STEPS THAT KRISHNA DIDN'T COMPLETE..... DUDE I EVEN NOTICED SOME STEPS HIS CHOREOGRAPHER DIDN'T COMPLETE....
ANKITA ON THE OTHER HAND HASN'T BEEN A DANCER AT ALLL...AND EVEN IF YOU JUSTTT COMPARE WILD CARD EPISODE, HER PERFORMANCE WAS BETTER.... IT WAS DEFINITELY A CLEANER ACT THAN KRISHNA......
JUDGES ARE NOT UNFAIR.. COME ON NOW....
DON'T BE EMOTIONAL.... LOL...

--Rachna-- thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#16
Eh, fair or unfair, how does it matter? The decision has been made and we've got to live with it now. Krushna is not coming back, period!
jimhawkins thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 14 years ago
#17
It was fair... Ankita is a better dancer... Krishna is over the top most of the time... I liked Yana as well...
prishta thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: ekta_salman

NONE of them should have been back

no one bet salyaana and only them deserved it
whts up with changin the rules to make the "2nd best" selected too
and yes if they did choose two it sure must have been yaana and krushna

I 1000000% agree with you. Ankita never socred 30 at least once. Her highest score was 27. Not even 29. But still she was taken back.
MMBG thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#19
Agree with topic maker. It was unfair why on the earth they have to select two for one wildcard entry and agree that Krushna perform much better than Ankita even though I love Ankita.
ArushiBS thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 14 years ago
#20
I agree. The decision was really unfair only to cater to the specific fangroup that is Ankita . Krushna had performed much better than Ankita's performance .

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".