Blindfold act really?? - Page 4

Originally posted by: shounak-rijul1

No..I do watch DID..and do know that contemporary dance isnt about stunts and all..I was talking in general...I mean..not specifical dance form a or anything...I do watch them..like them..but dont enjoy as much as I enjoy seeing dances which are more Indian!..Maybe bollywood style dancing or something like that?..😛

Originally posted by: Taz-A.Crazy.Fan

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh okay hehehe sorry the crazy die heart DID contemporary fan in me had to say soemthing hope i didnt sound rude =)

and i agree bollywood has its own filmy maza

Originally posted by: shounak-rijul1

Dont you think this was a part of their act???Ragini and Neerav were blind..I mean..they showed how difficult is for the differently abled people to live..someone who cant see..and that difficulty was shown by Ragini and Neerav finding each other half the time...I think they did it intentionally..as a part of the act..but yeah..i agree..sometimes...the co ordination was off at few places.But i reallly liked the perfromance.

Originally posted by: soul_angel

Oh I didn't thought it that way cause to me it really looked like they were finding eachother cause they have lost eachother while dancing oh well if that was a part of the act then I guess they did it very convincingly cause I sure bought it 😆

Ragini's performance was a brave and courageous one, and she did it well to a large extent. Hats off to her for that!

I agree however that the coordination was missing at a few places and it looked a little clumsy- it wasn't perfect. I have seen better blindfold acts than this one actually. Overall a good clapworthy performance, but not a WOW performance or a standing ovation deserving performance, cos it was not flawless.

But the 'coordination missing at a few places' and a little 'clumsiness' is MY observation and MY opinion- not the judges- they didn't seem to find anything wrong with her coordination (malaika said coordination was perfect) and actually praised it a lot- then why did they give 24? The judges know more than me anyday, but they should have commented clearly about what they exactly found lacking in the performance bcos of which they were being forced to cut marks inspite of the fact that it was a kind of performance which was astonishing as well as difficult- if they felt choreography was mediocre, if they felt postures were not correct, whatever the fact was, WHY DIDN'T THEY HONESTLY SAY IT? I felt bad for Ragini- she probably must be thinking I got so many good comments, then why didn't I get good marks?