Is it an illegal relation?Help plz

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Arnavdewaani

@Arnavdewaani

Navigator

Posted: 13 years ago

#11

definitely not illegal, we hv seen the contract... so there must be legal documentataion of marriage, otherwise the contract is void. also depends on ur belief system...i guess, like Khushi

Quote

trina2010

@trina2010

Rocker

+ 8

Posted: 13 years ago

#12

I am confused here. I myself had a court marriage and my social marriage happened later. Now court marriage is also valid but yeah according to Hindu marriage act a social marriage is nrcessery. Now some people do both simultaneously . Anyway I was considered married after my court marriage.Now for Arhi they are married since they did the court marriage and also lived together for 6 months. It's NOT ILLEGAL that's for sure.
Btw phera is not necessary. Many people does marriage by putting sindoor and MS in the registry office only after signing for marriage.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

..BhUvaNa

@..BhUvaNa

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: ItIsMyLife
So why the stupid Dadi said that they do not have the right to live in the same house?

Arhi's marriage is very much legal. Dadi says like that because she is 'Stupid Dadi'.

Quote

BLR_babe

@BLR_babe

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 13 years ago

#14

i'm a brahmin .. in my culture most important thg is 'daare' meaning giving away my dad gave me away to my husband ... then there were 'sapta padi' seven vows and then mangalsutra was there in front of fire .. fire is considered purest of all elements

different culture in hinduism have different customs .. for a society to accept a marriage it should witness the rituals and pandit has recite the mantars to call upon the god to bless ..

there is a kinda of marriage called gandhar vivah where the pair exchange garland in front of god .. but these are very recognized as its no ppl witness it .. if one says i'm not married and the other cant prove tht they r ..

all these rituals have meaning more importantly people has to witness it ..

Quote

Sunaina Mitra

@sunaina02

Inactive

+ 6

Posted: 13 years ago

#15

Even a saat -phere wala Hindu marriage is not legal enough to be divorced . Once a wife , always a wife .

A properly legal marriage in India is the one that is registered in Marriage Registers office .

Otherwise you are left without any document to prove your marriage as Hindu marriages are not registered or documented any where .

In early days to prove that you are married and get spouse visa , you needed to show wedding pics but currently I guess one needs marriage certificates to apply for spouse visa .

I have just pointed out the legal aspect and not the social aspect .

Edited by sunaina02 - 13 years ago

Quote

starlight06

@starlight06

Explorer

Posted: 13 years ago

#16

There wedding is absolutely legit it is
called the gandhar vivah where varmala is
exchanged mangal sutra is tied and maang barna
with sindoor.But as always you want your wedding
to be blessed by the priest and your family elders

Quote

shivani

@Miss.Colorfull

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: ItIsMyLife
So why the stupid Dadi said that they do not have the right to live in the same house?

in my opnion arnav and khushi are married but dadi is another case because she is really strict with rules and she believes that every ritual has to be follow in order to be considered as a couple in her eyes. i mean the rituals are important but once a guy ties mangalsutra and puts sinddor infront of fire and god they are married. i am a hindu myself. the pheras are basically vows that you have to give each other as a husband wife but mangalsutra and sindoor is the main thing that actually completes the wedding because after the pheras the groom does the sindoor and mangalsutra rasam.

Quote

trina2010

@trina2010

Rocker

+ 8

Posted: 13 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: sunaina02

Even a saat -phere wala Hindu marriage is not legalenough to be divorced . Once a wife , always a wife . 
A properly legal marriage in India is the one that is registered in Marriage Registers office . 

Otherwise you are left without any document to prove your marriage as Hindu marriages are not registered or documented any where .

In early days to prove that you are married and get spouse visa , you needed to show wedding pics but currently I guessone needs marriage certificates to apply for spouse visa . 
I have just pointed out the legal aspect and not the social aspect . 

I needed both marriage certificate and pics when I applied for my US visa . I think you need both.
But now I think only marriage certificate is needed.

Quote

Aisha

@MOTHERHOOD

Stunner

+ 10

Posted: 13 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: sunaina02
Even a saat -phere wala Hindu marriage is not legal enough to be divorced . Once a wife , always a wife .

A properly legal marriage in India is the one that is registered in Marriage Registers office .

Otherwise you are left without any document to prove your marriage as Hindu marriages are not registered or documented any where .

In early days to prove that you are married and get spouse visa , you needed to show wedding pics but currently I guess one needs marriage certificates to apply for spouse visa .

I have just pointed out the legal aspect and not the social aspect .

But they did not seem to have registered their marriage.Otherwise Arnav would have shown dadi the legal documents.And even they did not take pheras.So can they be termed as having illegal relationship according to Indian law and society.

Quote

raina

@Girlabouttown

Rocker

+ 6

Posted: 13 years ago

#20

No it is not. One of my cousins didn't take the pheras. Even in court marriages there's only "Jaimala" rasam and marriage registration happens. Dadi is wrong here...

Quote

1 2 3 4

Is it an illegal relation?Help plz - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics