Today we were shown both sides...
SIDE 1: Kanak, who takes it upon herself to humiliate a poor,weak widow who is already a victim of cruel societal traditions because she feels it's her right [self-proclaimed, of course] to punish the girl who has ushered in a break up for her son...
Question is would she DARE do the same had the girl not been a "helpless widow"& been some raeiszaadi of Tania's stature? The answer is NO! She would rather back her son&praise him for his valour & may have even day dreamed of a high profile marriage between her son and the girl Hypocritical enough?
SIDE 2: Viplav, a guy who takes it upon himself to save a drowning acquaintance... Even though the acquaintance is a girl who is weak,poor,helpless & he knows there are no profits in his act.. It's just humanity that is his call.. He is misunderstood by that v.girl he saves & yet he seeks to find out her whereabouts, yearns to know if she is fine & wants to clarify her misunderstanding! Some may say hes doing this bcz hes drawn towards her but I say hes doing this bcz hes a genuine human being... Someone who's not just human but humane..
I wish the society which oft times reflects its ugly side comprised such ppl as Viplav.. Then the world would be a better place...
PS: I also think, as members of society people can always choose the side!!
What do you think? Do share your views