Ques on MahaBhrarta. Peep in/ DT Nt pg 25 - Page 20

Created

Last reply

Replies

287

Views

32.8k

Users

13

Likes

636

Frequent Posters

ltelidevara thumbnail
Visit Streak 1000 Thumbnail Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

@Lakshmi currently I am busy with my book. I am planning to publish seven vows which I had written in IF. I was very happy to see u here to discuss once again on arjun and Krishna.

Great. Looking forward to your book. Inform me when it is ready. Good luck to you.


Lakshmi
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
Hello guys,

Please stick to the main topic of discussion. Lets retain the essence of this interesting topic.
Use PM service for other talks.

PS: Do not quote to reply to this note.

MM DT


Edited by mnx12 - 7 years ago
Y12345 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
Guys btw I may have skipped that part before or where I read it, maybe it wasn't there(I read different versions so apologies) but I think there was on instance where someone asked Krishna why so much violence, why not set a plague and kill everyone, and with people gone, evil is already gone. His answer along the lines was the price of unrighteousness has to be paid with blood, so that people remembers it forever.
And when asked about his favoritism with Pandavs, he said he is never partial, but he helped them because it was the whole purpose of his reincarnation, and again, when questioned, that he is helping the Pandavas too much, and people will lose faith in hardwork, and while it is true that Krishna facilitated and made everything possible for them to kill whoever had to die, and handed them everything on a plate but the Pandavas also worked hard when they were in exile, and it is clear they were hardworking, therefore they had only to reap the seeds of their hardwork.
For people to not lose faith in penance also, he accepted Gandhari curse, I think.He didnt accepted that curse because he could have prevented the war, it was his destiny and life purpose, but he did it because he tricked Dury when hs mom was transferring all her energy in him, and it was not the fault of a mom who wanted to save his child by her own meditation and hardwork.
Edited by Y12345 - 7 years ago
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
@Yenna Krishna never undermined Purusharth or the value of self belief, learning and skills. That's why he gave direction to Arjuna though he never fought the war. He brought Jayadrada in front of Arjuna, but to behead him and take his head towards the lap of his father, Arjuna's archery skills were needed.
Arjuna fought Karna with the divine weapons he acquired with his meditation. Bhima also had put in a lot of effort to defeat Duryodhana.

So Krishna guided them but they fought the war on their merit. And in a society where Duri allowed Shakuni to play on his behalf, Krishna didnt fight on behalf of Pandavas. He gave Narayani Sena to Kauravas. Only Narayan went with Arjun that too after asking him. Arjun chose Narayan over Naryani Sena when both options were given to him.

And if Krishna was really partial he would have saved Abhimanyu from that brutal death. After all he was his nephew.


Y12345 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
🤗
Edited by Y12345 - 7 years ago
Y12345 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago

Hi all. I'm happy to announce that I asked for this to be opened again, hopefully we can continue to have more fruitful discussions.


So, to launch on again the debate I been reading the part in Mahabharata where Lord Krishna explains the BG to Arjun more precisely what he said about reincarnation, see the thing is that the more you read about it again, each time, you get a whole new perspective and lots of questions.

Hence, I was thinking a lot lately about karma, and the fact that if we want to be reunited with the Supreme Lord and not be born in this materialistic world , we must do good, to put it in simple terms, and we must also be self-aware souls (self consciousness) so that we won't be born again and suffer, or worst be born as an animal or insect. This is what vedic tells us right?; (I didnt put the verses that say that but feel free to add it)

1)But my question would be suppose I do bad and I'm born as a insect because of my bad karma, how can I lift myself from this situation especially if I do not have the consciousness to do it? Since, I'm an insect, so does that mean I will be trapped in this cycle of birth/rebirth forever? Meaning only us humans can attain the supreme soul because we have the means to do it? Once we go down the ladder because of bad karma, we cannot go against nature and go up and correct our karma?

This also brings me to my second question; why in the first place our souls got separated from the supreme soul?


2)Now, another question: I again thought about it a lot, and it might be difficult to put it in words, but I'll try. So, as I said before( please correct me always if I'm wrong!) that only self realized souls go to the supreme soul, and those who don't go through the cycle again and again and are reborn according to their karma, but how does that work? What I can inferred from my knowledge( MB+BG) is that once we are dead, our soul may enter a new womb but at what time does that exactly happen? 3 months when heartbeat is detected? And what if the soul doesn't have a womb to enter right now? Then what happens? We are made to believe that God separated his ( supreme) soul and created us sub-souls but how many are they? On a practical level, is the number of death and number of birth constant in the world? If not, then can we say that the difference is the number of souls that are the great souls who won' be born again? Again, the world population keeps increasing how do we explain that? Think about the MB war, loads of people died, what happened to their souls?

Okay second question is a bit crazy but it's an absolute pleasure to read your responses and to ponder on your questions. Cheers. Looking forward

Viswasruti thumbnail

Team Arjun

Posted: 5 years ago

Just now read most of the posts, very interesting! 👏In-depth philosophical,---- theoretical, analytical,and logical analysis is required to answer your questions dear thread maker!😊But at the same time, there is a logical impossibility to give answers in a straight forward way!

Edited by Viswasruti - 5 years ago
Y12345 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Just now read most of the posts, very interesting! 👏In-depth philosophical,---- theoretical, analytical,and logical analysis is required to answer your questions dear thread maker!😊But at the same time, there is a logical impossibility to give answers in a straight forward way!

Hi welcome to the thread. Feel free to share your views on any of the issues raised. Everyone is welcome here :)
Viswasruti thumbnail

Team Arjun

Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Y12345

Hi all. I'm happy to announce that I asked for this to be opened again, hopefully we can continue to have more fruitful discussions.

So, to launch on again the debate I been reading the part in Mahabharata where Lord Krishna explains the BG to Arjun more precisely what he said about reincarnation, see the thing is that the more you read about it again, each time, you get a whole new perspective and lots of questions.

Hence, I was thinking a lot lately about karma, and the fact that if we want to be reunited with the Supreme Lord and not be born in this materialistic world , we must do good, to put it in simple terms, and we must also be self-aware souls (self consciousness) so that we won't be born again and suffer, or worst be born as an animal or insect. This is what vedic tells us right?; (I didnt put the verses that say that but feel free to add it)

1)But my question would be suppose I do bad and I'm born as a insect because of my bad karma, how can I lift myself from this situation especially if I do not have the consciousness to do it? Since, I'm an insect, so does that mean I will be trapped in this cycle of birth/rebirth forever? Meaning only us humans can attain the supreme soul because we have the means to do it? Once we go down the ladder because of bad karma, we cannot go against nature and go up and correct our karma?----

To put our berserk desires under control, the Vedas, Upanishads say, if we do good karma we will get a decent birth , if we do harm to others then we will get a lower level of birth, defined the reincarnation theory in a clear manner to control the societal norms.

You are talking about Reincarnation which is a major aspect of Hindu philosophy, defines when the soul which is seen as eternal and part of a spiritual realm, returns to the physical realm in a new body after exiting from the previous body. A soul will complete this cycle many times, learning new things each time and working through its karma. This cycle of reincarnation is called samsara. One who seeks liberation & freedom from Samsara/cycle of birth and death, they should follow the religious path which purifies the soul from sinful thoughts and deeds. They should be revered only by considering the presence of Supreme Brahman, Paramatma ,--within them in the form of Atman/soul/Root consciousness! ---

Here I am trying to give you a simple analogy --- Sunlight 'the birth'>>>>> water vapour --'desires and deeds to fulfill those'>>>> clouds with lightning and thunders 'Karma theory ... consciousness and conscience'>>>>> Rain 'the ultimate result of the Atma in this world, the death'... the consequent transformation of the Atma into Paramatma>>>> the Paramatma is the ocean!

Started our journey as a small ray of the Sun, the consciousness of the Atma through the birth, and the ultimate truth is uniting into the Paramatma! The earth is the absorbant of the water drop, that is life!! that is we, with full of sapling like desires, flowers like colourful wants, fruits like aspirations>>> and ultimately inclination towards spreading life, that is seed, the root cause of the reincarnation!

I hope I can answer your first part of the first question, though I am not fully satisfied with my answer. I will be back to be with you to learn, to discuss and to share views on this interesting subject.smiley1

This also brings me to my second question; why in the first place our souls got separated from the supreme soul?

2)Now, another question: I again thought about it a lot, and it might be difficult to put it in words, but I'll try. So, as I said before( please correct me always if I'm wrong!) that only self realized souls go to the supreme soul, and those who don't go through the cycle again and again and are reborn according to their karma, but how does that work? What I can inferred from my knowledge( MB+BG) is that once we are dead, our soul may enter a new womb but at what time does that exactly happen? 3 months when heartbeat is detected? And what if the soul doesn't have a womb to enter right now? Then what happens? We are made to believe that God separated his ( supreme) soul and created us sub-souls but how many are they? On a practical level, is the number of death and number of birth constant in the world? If not, then can we say that the difference is the number of souls that are the great souls who won' be born again? Again, the world population keeps increasing how do we explain that? Think about the MB war, loads of people died, what happened to their souls?

Okay second question is a bit crazy but it's an absolute pleasure to read your responses and to ponder on your questions. Cheers. Looking forward

Edited by Viswasruti - 5 years ago
Viswasruti thumbnail

Team Arjun

Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Y12345

Hi all. I'm happy to announce that I asked for this to be opened again, hopefully we can continue to have more fruitful discussions.

So, to launch on again the debate I been reading the part in Mahabharata where Lord Krishna explains the BG to Arjun more precisely what he said about reincarnation, see the thing is that the more you read about it again, each time, you get a whole new perspective and lots of questions.

Hence, I was thinking a lot lately about karma, and the fact that if we want to be reunited with the Supreme Lord and not be born in this materialistic world , we must do good, to put it in simple terms, and we must also be self-aware souls (self consciousness) so that we won't be born again and suffer, or worst be born as an animal or insect. This is what vedic tells us right?; (I didnt put the verses that say that but feel free to add it)

1)But my question would be suppose I do bad and I'm born as a insect because of my bad karma, how can I lift myself from this situation especially if I do not have the consciousness to do it? Since, I'm an insect, so does that mean I will be trapped in this cycle of birth/rebirth forever? Meaning only us humans can attain the supreme soul because we have the means to do it? Once we go down the ladder because of bad karma, we cannot go against nature and go up and correct our karma?

This also brings me to my second question; why in the first place our souls got separated from the supreme soul?

When did the raindrop separate itself from the huge water body of the Ocean?? It is a continuous process, Atma coming to earth in search of its Karma, and after finishing its Karma it reunites with the Paramatma.

Here, let me look into Sri Aurobindo Ghosh's theory on Human progress and Spiritual Evolution--- Acco to him, the Atma took many births to evolve itself until it becomes Paramatma i.e, a completely evolved Atma >>>> Acco to his theory , he explains -- the Atma with its full consciousness will try to evolve, to reach the acme of the spiritual consciousness to become Paramatma,>>> a human becoming Suprahuman through the spiritual and divine awakening within him which is a continuous process of Atma, -- in a way here he supported the evolution theory, but not in broader perspective , but with a spiritual perspective. According to Aurobindo, Ram and Krishna are the evolved Supra humans, and he said >. every atma has that high potential to become a supra human-like Ram and Krishna, in simple words a God! It means every Atma has the high potential to become Parmatma, >>God!

On this special spiritual aspect, there were many theories that emerged, i.e, Advaita, Dvaita and Visishtadwaita Vedanta theories.

Sankaracharya's Advaita philosophy defined the relationship of Atma to Paramatma as a nondual single entity, there is only one reality and that is God-- Aham Brahmasmi-- It says the creator and his creation are not two (dual) things but are one. Therefore simply put, aham brahmasmi means 'I am God'. Advaita means non-duality or absence of duality. It is a state of oneness with the rest of creation, of the subject with the object, of the knower with the known, of the lower self with the highest self and of the ordinary consciousness with the higher consciousness. It comes with a heightened sense of awareness in which one sees everything in oneself and as oneself. It is the state described in the Upanishads that experience the self as everything and everything in the self. It states that both the individual self 'Atman' and Brahman are the same.

The dvaita Vedanta thought --Madhvacharya propounded this philosophy. It considers Brahman and Atman as two different entities and Bhakti as the route to eternal salvation. According to Dvaita, Jivatma are many and Paramatma is one. Concerning the soul, Madhvacharya says that no two souls are alike. They each have different characteristics, different states of happiness/sorrow...the soul becomes similar to God in some respects when it is liberated, yet even in these respects, it is much inferior to God. Alternatively known as Bhedavāda, Tattvavāda and Bimbapratibimbavāda. Here, the difference between Atma and Paramatma is clearly visible.

Vishishtadvaita philosophy was pioneered by Ramanujacharya, literally means the Unique Advaita, that is, Advaita with some amendments!! While it accepts Brahman as the unified whole, it states>> He is characterized by multiple forms. According to Ramanujacharya, souls are intrinsically the same and all souls are alike in their quality. God stands for the whole universe and matter and souls form His body, He being THEIR soul. God is viewed as the cause and also as the effect. Ramanuja's philosophy is a fusion of the Vedas and the Bhagavata Purana. He was enormously influenced by the Tamil Bhakti Saints called Alvars. Vishishtadvaita is qualified monism, where God alone exists, but it admits a plurality of souls. It is midway between Advaita and Dvaita philosophies. God and the individual souls are inseparable, just like the fire and spark. In liberation, the Jivatma understands Paramatma, but do not merge in Paramatma.

In the final analysis, the above three philosophies are the different stages of spiritual evolution. No philosophy is inferior to the other. The majority of Hindus follow the Dvaita philosophy. They feel that God is the controller of their life, God is different from them. Advaita philosophy exactly conveys the meaning of the Upanishads, Brahma Sutras and Bhagavad Gita. However, it is still popular among the highly spiritually evolved people.

Please , correct me whenever it is necessary, I know, I am prone to confuse myself as well as others in matters of religion and philosophical aspects while thinking about those matters seriously.😊

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".