If he wasn't Nara the sage,why does Indra describe Nara-Narayan on the very instance i mentioned above?
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 5th Dec, 2025
REVISION OF YRKKH 4.12
KAVERI IS BACK 5.12
Yami calls out the PR against Dhurandhar and Hrithik supports.
Let's talk Gen 3
Trp's crashed : Forced to change storyline
Noyna ‘Sarabhai’?!!
Kaira Memory ❤️
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan & Kriti Sanon at the Red Sea Festival
Dhurandhar has fair opening
SRK & Kajol at Leicester to unveil DDLJ statue.
India Entertainment awards - Bollywood Hungama Kriti Vicky Ahaan Aneet
Ambani s Swadeshi Event
If he wasn't Nara the sage,why does Indra describe Nara-Narayan on the very instance i mentioned above?
Exactly what i wanted to say!Originally posted by: KrishnaPriyaa
Just one thing:
Shri Krishna's protection ensured Parth with all the success he needed.In my point of view, that is the summary.Hence, we can concude that one who surrenders to the Lord, and asks for His blessings and protection will be the victor, for only when the man knows Dharma will he get that Dharma is Krishna.
No,i know you know it. 😛 I just posted the translation here,that's all.Originally posted by: KrishnaPriyaa
This story I know Rammy. Yet, Parth is not the sage Nara. Then him marrying Panchali won't add up. He had a part of Nara in him, but he isn't Nara purna. He had to have some part of Maharishi Mugdhalya in him for Kalyani to have married him.
No,i know you know it. 😛 I just posted the translation here,that's all.
@bold-That leaves me thinking. Because i never heard he had a part of Rishi Mughdhalya in him. But it is quite possible.
By the way,the entire discussion today has given me lots of story ideas. 😛😉