|| Indian Mythology:: Doubts & Discussions || - Page 47

Created

Last reply

Replies

559

Views

116.8k

Users

64

Likes

1k

Frequent Posters

sambhavami thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Thank you so much Semadi!! So, these two are the main theories I presume? And I think the 2nd theory - the Advaita one, it was explained after the Aaja RE Kanhaiya waala song in SK! Thank yuo very much! This explanation was very helpful!
.Reshama. thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
i get very confused ..in our holy scripturs woman have a good place..but in this kaliyug ..most men treat woman like a servant or a slave...
and its always womans fault..
its like those men cant control themselves..
even they forgot that woman also has an aatma and thats a gods gift...
when men are pati parmeshwar then woman are ghar ki laxmi and no slave...
in those house where woman are not respected ...god will not reside their...

those men/ creaters are insulting gods creation...
in my opinion their actions are like rakshash




bhas1066 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
i have a doubt in this para in KMG before yudi stakes his brothers:

""Yudhishthira said,--These princes here, O king, who look resplendent in their ornaments and their ear-rings and Nishkas and all the royal ornaments on their persons are now my wealth. With this wealth, O king, I play with thee. Vaisampayana said,--"Hearing this, Sakuni, ready with his dice, adopting foul means, said unto Yudhishthira, 'Lo! I have won them.'"Yudhishthira said,--'This Nakula here, of mighty arms and leonine neck, of red eyes and endued with youth, is now my one stake. Know that he is my wealth.'

The Mahabharata, Book 2: Sabha Parva: Sisupala-badha Parva: Section LXIV"



@ red " who are the princes yudi is talking about here ? are they pandavas sons? were they present during the VH?
DharmaPriyaa thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
These princes are Bheem Arjun Nakul Sahadev, not Pandava children.
Read last part of Sabha Parva. No mention of children. They were not present during dice game. Neither did they followed their parents to exile. But there you go. In Van Parva when Krishna came to meet them, Dhristadyumna too was with Him. Finally we can see Dhrista taking Draupadi's children with him. (We may assume Abhi did not come there to meet Pandavas, later Subhadra took him to Dwaraka. Because we can see later that Abhi and UP were already in Dwaraka. Vyas Dev did not tell us when UP shifted to Dwaraka.) So where did Dhrista get his nephews from? They did not come to forest, then? So there is only one possibility. We can assume that children were in IP when dice game was taking place. Later Krishna, Dhrista etc came and took the babies with them. Children met their parents once and then went to Kampilya, and probably few years later, to Dwaraka.
Edited by Urmila11 - 10 years ago
bhas1066 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
@urmila

that what i thought earier too since they dont mention them anyehere else but then read the sentence again(see in black below) - yudi stakes the " princes" and shakuni rolls the dice and says "i have won". Then he stakes BANS one after the other. I he had already lost them how does he stake them again. If not , then who was on stake then when shakuni says he won?? or just a repetition in KMG??

""Yudhishthira said,--These princes here, O king, who look resplendent in their ornaments and their ear-rings and Nishkas and all the royal ornaments on their persons are now my wealth. With this wealth, O king, I play with thee. Vaisampayana said,--"Hearing this, Sakuni, ready with his dice, adopting foul means, said unto Yudhishthira, 'Lo! I have won them.'"Yudhishthira said,--'This Nakula here, of mighty arms and leonine neck, of red eyes and endued with youth, is now my one stake. Know that he is my wealth.'


Edited by bhas1066 - 10 years ago
DharmaPriyaa thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
Oho KMG has changed the whole thing. Sorry I did not notice earlier. I will post the original verse ASAP. It says that ornaments of princes were staked at that hand, not the princes themselves.
bhas1066 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: Urmila11

Oho KMG has changed the whole thing. Sorry I did not notice earlier. I will post the original verse ASAP. It says that ornaments of princes were staked at that hand, not the princes themselves.




aaah! now that makes sense. thanks!
Druids thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Hi everyone. I am a complete novice when it comes to scriptures. And am overjoyed by the number of knowledgeable people in this forum.
I have a query. Who was the ninth avatar o Lord Vishnu? Many places say Buddha and many say Lord Ayappa.

I don't know much about Lord Ayappa but apparently the Sabarimala pilgrimage is held in His honour.

It seems to me that Buddha cannot be an avatar as all the other avatars were already enlightened/ god-like by birth. But Lord Buddha had to struggle for salvation. He left home and then went to many gurus and finally got enlightenment under the Bodhi tree.
Surya_krsnbhakt thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: Druids

Hi everyone. I am a complete novice when it comes to scriptures. And am overjoyed by the number of knowledgeable people in this forum.

I have a query. Who was the ninth avatar o Lord Vishnu? Many places say Buddha and many say Lord Ayappa.

I don't know much about Lord Ayappa but apparently the Sabarimala pilgrimage is held in His honour.

It seems to me that Buddha cannot be an avatar as all the other avatars were already enlightened/ god-like by birth. But Lord Buddha had to struggle for salvation. He left home and then went to many gurus and finally got enlightenment under the Bodhi tree.


Lord Ayyappa is the son of Lord Shiva and Lord Vishnu, not the avatara of Vishnu.
The ninth avatara of Vishnu varies with regions, but generally it is Buddha.
In the Srimad Bhagavatam, it is given that Lord Buddha incarnated to delude the evil minded people away from the idea of slaughter by banning animal sacrifice, so that they could at least move an inch towards dharma. (Of course, there it is Anjana Devi's son, while Siddhartha Gautama was Mayadevi's son.)

sambhavami thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
I had another question. This has been on my mind for many days.
If Balram was an incarnation, and knew at least half of what was going on, then why did he like Duryodhan so much?
You'd say, he was an excellent fighter, most probably the type Balram liked. Fine, I agree and I have absolutely no problem with this. But how could he continue with his liking after what Dury did to the Pandavas in the Dyut Sabha?
Yeah, he was being fair when he intervened in the last fight between Dury and Bheem, but I don't the way he ticks of Krishna just before the war.
So, please help, anyone?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".