Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 4th Dec, 2025
REVISION OF YRKKH 4.12
FAMILY TREE 3.12
🏏South Africa tour of India 2025: India vs SA - 2nd ODI🏏
5000 episodes of YRKKH
Should "Megastar" King Khan stop dancing at weddings at 60?
Yami calls out the PR against Dhurandhar and Hrithik supports.
My Box Office Predictions for Dhurandhar
They have only one topic! “GK”
Kriti Sanon s sister s wedding/Kartik s sisters wedding.
Let's talk Gen 3
Kaira Memory ❤️
Paparazzi Hit Back At Jaya Bachchan Call For Boycott
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan at the Red Sea Festival
Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol statue unveiled in London- video
Here are the clues I and Aishu have set and the suggestion of character was of Aishu.
A king of the kingdom once I ruled was killed by a warrior who was killed unfairly in a war
A king K of the kingdom Q once I (I) ruled was killed by a warrior W who was killed unfairly in a war
The above question is slightly confusing, so please tell me if I understood it correctly:
A king K of the kingdom Q once I (I) ruled was killed by a warrior W who was killed unfairly in a war
The guy C who was one of the causes of the above war was the king of the kingdom "R" ruled by my brother's IB lineageA force F which worked passively and significantly in that above war for the victorious side, had played the part actively and significantly in the battle which I (I) had foughtSo as I understand it
- K was killed by W, and K is not the same as I - Yes correct interpretation
- I, K, IB & C were all rulers of the same kingdom Q, albeit @ different times - No. Two kingdoms in first two clues need not be the same (but associated kingdoms ruled by or won & then ruled by same dynasty but by two brothers separately or uncle (I) & nephew separately). Correction in your interpretation: I & K were the rulers of a kingdom Q @different times, IB lineage & C were the kings of a kingdom R @different times
- W was unfairly killed by someone else - Yes. Correct - by someone out of context of other clues - can be anybody it doesn't matter and doesn't affect the guessing of the answer.
- C was IB's descendant, where IB was I's brother, and therefore, C was I's nephew or nephew's descendant - No. Correction of interpretation - C may not be the descendant of IB lineage. The dynasty may have changed over a period of time and C may be a descendant of a dynasty winning the kingdom in war from the former dynasty in between period.
- F was I's ally or enemy - Yes. Correct.
- I was alive and fought in the same war that F contrived the victory for - F passively helped the victory of the war mentioned in first two clues (in which K and W participated and C was the cause who may also have participated in it). The war which I had fought in the past, F participated in it actively. Two wars are different.
Did I read all these correctly? If not, please clarify.I have clarified but that was indeed a nice sincere effort Vrish to guess it. Brilliant way of analysing. I hope it is clear now. We also had (have) framed the same set of clues with few more elaborating words supplying more information. If you want us to post further elaboration of same clues, we will. Till then, all the best. And of course, 'I' is the answer you know.
Jarasandha?
I = JarasandhaK = Jarasandha's son SahadevW = DronacharyaQ = MagadhaR = HastinapurC = DhritarashtraIB = Shantanu (Jarasandha's cousin - is that what you meant by brother? Jarasandha & Shantanu were both grandsons of Kuru)F = Krishna