Originally posted by: julee
i'm completely agree with you.
prashant is far far better than most of the contestent and if he improves a bit i garuntee that he will be next II3. he is just "UN-CUT DIMOND".
Guys.....here is a method to rate:
1. take pen and paper before gala starts
2. don't care who is singing, where s/he from, what is her/his background, close your eyes....and listen every contestent
3. rate immediately once song finished (do mute for judges or don't listen to judge or finish rating before judges comments). it is your judgement whom you like the best....don't say at beggining this guys/gals sang fabolus and after judeges comments s/he sang so-so.
4. i'm sure you will find prashant one of the most talented singer. he has such a gr8 voice. he has a tremendious appeal in his voice.
5. friends, don't listen what others are saying. listen what your heart is saying.
This is a brilliant post. Actually on this forum there is an emotional reaction to the exit of 4 consecutive girls. However fact remains that there is a deep reason for why these 4 girls were eliminated. They were not as good as other contestants. The only exception is Smita who went out because of her looks. But Richa, Charu and Jolly were simply not as competent as other singers.
It is entirely wrong to pic one candidate who was criticized by judges (for their own personal bias) on the 4th gala aur fir us ki is forum par mazaak auraya jai. Infact we should feel sorry for Prashant that he is being targeted unfairly despite his natural talent and melodius voice.
Charu's exit was right.. she had been completely out of sur in the gala rounds and honestly uptil now I dont even remember any of her songs/performances. They just didnt influence me at all. Her looks were great but you cannot progress only on your looks you have to sing well.
Junta likes Prashant because he is a simple, humble, nice human being who sings from his heart (even without training) and has the best voice of any contestant in II3, Amul VOI and SaReGaMa combined.