Page
of
1KRISH THROWN 28.12
BUY FIRM BACK 29.12
Let's make if official
No wonder Sunny Deol was jealous from SRK!!!
Tara Veer are now being compared with the OG Deepika Ranveer ☠️
Love And War Budget Shoots up ,now eyeing Aug/Sep release
🏏India Women vs Sri Lanka Women, 4th T20I Thiruvananthapuram🏏
Ranbir Kapoor Fresh Look
Hrithik Roshan is the most beautiful man to ever exist
📚Book Talk January Reading Challenge: Let us Read, Review & Revel📚
since harry potter is by a british author and the films r british nt american the theme park should have been in britain nt the us. the us always gets the credit and for once when a british film is doing well us want to use it!
BBC News Online highlights the key movies in the development of the British film industry.
The money behind the film may be American but the all-British cast, British locations and British source material from JK Rowling just about qualifies it as a British movie.
It may not have made much of an impression at the Oscars but it certainly did at the box office, taking more than $365m in the US alone.
The film was similarly ignored at the Baftas.
When it was released the movie also opened on 3,762 screen in the US, which was a record.
Director Chris Columbus remained faithful to the book and so avoided castigation from millions of Potter fans around the world.
| Credits Director: Chris Columbus Producer: David Heyman Screenplay: Steven Kloves Score: John Williams Cast: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint |
Much of the film's Britishness is down to author J.K. Rowling.
She reportedly insisted that the main cast be British although Richard Harris was Irish and Zoe Wanamaker is actually a US citizen.
Steven Spielberg was reported to have been offered the director's chair first and he wanted Haley Joel Osment for the part of Harry.