Harry Potter Quiz -This isn't MAGIC, it's LOGIC ;)

First Previous

Page

114

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Lumos

@Lumos

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#241

Wow...my guess is right! 😃 nice riddle sagar!
Actually i thought the same explanations that you gave except the myth which i earlier said didnt fit with my answer ...well i get it now since u explained it. :) but yaar i didnt get how come the ring prove the myth of the deathly hallows to be true? Guess you might be refering to the resurrection stone? But how does it bear connection with the ring?

and of course waiting for your next riddle! 😊

Quote

Alyesha

@Mione

Inactive

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#242

Very nice riddle Sagar 👍🏼. I would have participated but was a bit busy to come online yesterday 😊...looking forward to more from you.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Alyesha

@Mione

Inactive

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#243

Originally posted by: -varun-
but yaar i didnt get how come the ring prove the myth of the deathly hallows to be true? Guess you might be refering to the resurrection stone? But how does it bear connection with the ring? 😊

Varun I think it's because the stone in the ring was after all the resurrection stone but Marvolo was not aware of that fact and neither was Voldy when he turned it into a horcrux 😛. That was revealed only later when Dumbledore tells Harry (at Kings Cross Heaven 😉 😆)

Quote

Sagar Dutta

@GodricSlytherin

Beginner

Posted: 12 years ago

#244

@varun--> yes i was referring to the stone. 😊 Thank You Mione...You explained it all ^_^

Thank you all for your kind words...It is greatly appreciated.😃

Will come up with a new one soon enough.

Edited by GodricSlytherin - 12 years ago

Quote

Lumos

@Lumos

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#245

Thanks guys for explaining but ive still a doubt! In fact ive always had this doubt! 😆 the properties of the object seemed to destroy when one turns it into a horcrux. So how come the stone wasnt damaged? And also..if the stone was a part of the ring, naturally it would be turn into a horcrux too..so doesnt it mean a part of the horcrux stands undestroyed? Sorry for being a bit silly but i always had this confusion. :-(

Quote

Lumos

@Lumos

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#246

Hey sagar...your riddle was great!..and the logic is fine too but i always had that doubt about ring and stone 😳😔

Quote

Alyesha

@Mione

Inactive

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#247

Originally posted by: payalpencil
dobby?

????????😕??????????

Quote

Alyesha

@Mione

Inactive

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#248

Here's one more riddle for you guys...Thought of it in the train 😛. Happy solving:

The first wasn't who you thought you'd see at the end;

But the sixth one was.

The second turned out to be less than was expected,

But the third turned out to be more- in fact the most.

The fourth and seventh were cut from the same cloth,

The quality of the fabric obviously the worst.

The fifth decided to make their role much more,

And ended up getting hurt.

Edited by Mione - 12 years ago

Quote

Alyesha

@Mione

Inactive

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#249

Originally posted by: -varun-
Thanks guys for explaining but ive still a doubt! In fact ive always had this doubt! 😆 the properties of the object seemed to destroy when one turns it into a horcrux. So how come the stone wasnt damaged? And also..if the stone was a part of the ring, naturally it would be turn into a horcrux too..so doesnt it mean a part of the horcrux stands undestroyed? Sorry for being a bit silly but i always had this confusion. :-(

If it's a normal object then yes, it's properties are destroyed. But I guess something as powerful as the resurrection stone would not be harmed by dark magic, since it's one of the items that has ancient and immense magic of it's own. The power to recall the dead - Competition for a horcrux, don't you think!? 😉 😆 Besides, I think when it's said that the ring was a horcrux, it may refer to the band of the ring. Perhaps, the stone was added to it separately for safekeeping. Just my reasoning...it doesn't have to be true. 😳

Check out the new riddle! 😃

Quote

Lumos

@Lumos

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#250

Thanks for the explanation alyesha. I had googled few days after i posted and its the same as you explained. :) i do agree with your explanation. But since the stone was in the ring since beginning, does mean it could have descended from the peverell brothers! Which means harry and voldy were related! LOL

thanks for the riddle..but at the moment im clueless😃..is it some fabric..? Or ..a person?