Created

Last reply

Replies

15

Views

895

Users

14

Frequent Posters

uvcraziestfan thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 19 years ago
#11
for crying out loud d 2nd time u cant add d hole book which takes atleast 1 week to read into a 2 hr time sclot we shud b prepared dat d movie wud b very differnet frm d book so y fuss i liked d movie as it was but it was confuisn as all d others movie to d ppl who ddint read d book coz my parents didnt let me c d movie peealfully soo plzz read d book b4 goitng for d hop movie n dun make it a disaster for dose who r enjoying it
punk princess thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: daniel_4ever




course there is a beetle.. u remember madam maxiem eating
sumthing frm hagrid's beard.... remember.... it is a beetle and tht is
rite .. 😃 😃



if the beetle was rita skeeter just imagine that 😆 😆
sweet freedom thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#13
madam maxine eating rita skeeter. lol 😆
niyati_patel thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#14
honestly i think there was more harry and hermione scene then hermione ron .. i dont know why they involving between them ....thye should have shown the dudleys tongue going long that was so cracking... i love fred and george they look cute...
they didnt show too much of hermione with victor like the book ...so sad...
blughost91 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#15
THE MOVIES ARE VERY HARRY/HERMIONE THAN RON/HERMIONE...ESPECIALLY THE THIRD ONE....BUT THE FOURTH I THINK WAS MORE TRU TO THE BOOK THAN THE THIRD....IT'S TRU THAT THEY DIDN'T HAVEA LOT FROM THE BOOK...BUT THEY HAD A BUDGET...SO...U KNOW U CAN'T FIT THAT HUGE BOOK INTO THREE HOURS...JUST IMAGINE HOW MUCH THE FIFTH MOVIE WOULD COST IF THEY PUT IN EVERY SINGLE DETAIL!!!!

SIMI
ekta18 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: sumaira.daud

In all cases, movies are always disappointing compared to the book. This is because the book goes into small detail, while the movie goes on just the top things. You can't cover so much in just one movie! Remember, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was the first long book JK Rowling wrote. The first three books were really short, so that's why they could cover most of the book. But since the fourth book is so long, you can't really blame them for not covering all of it. It's the longest Harry Potter movie to date, how much longer do you want to make it? I agree with punk princess, they should've just made two movies if they couldn't cover everything. But even if they did make two movies, I still don't think anyone would've been satisfied. Obviously they can't cover each and every detail. So give them a break.

I totally agree. You will definately be disappointed if you compare the movie to the book. In my opinion, GOF was already quite long compared to other movies!(not that i mind😳)

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".