punk princess thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#1
😑 😑 😑 SORRY IF U R OFFENDEd 😑 😑 😑

i once heard dan or emma in a interview saying that the people who making the movie were trying to be faithful to the book which was bit of a lie. HYPOCRITES. 😑

the movie is also misleading because

they forgot rita skeeter being animagi. How in book 5 is rita skeeter gonna rite the article about voldemort being alive. rita is never gonna listen to a bunch of 16/15 year olds.

hermione seems to like harry instead of ron

another thing iz that why on earth did hermione cry after the yule ball? i mean in she was supposed to make ron jealous by going with viktor which she did and it worked.

barty crouch jr was supposed to be dementor kissed aswell

the dursley shud hav been in cos it wud hav been REALLY FUNNY wat wid the fireplace been blasted off the wall and dudley's ton tongue.

it wud hav been better if there was percy, bill and charlie were in it

wat about the other trials in the pensive like the one
wid barty jr and bellatrix 😑

may be it was better off being in two films

i mean jk is rich than the queen she's got enough money to buy a loads of bugatti veyrons (which is the fastest car in the world)
Edited by punk princess - 19 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

15

Views

893

Users

14

Frequent Posters

remixfan thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#2
ya,i did not find any beetles πŸ˜†
sweet freedom thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#3
well, you know that i totally agree wid u.
daniel_4ever thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: remixfan

ya,i did not find any beetles πŸ˜†



course there is a beetle.. u remember madam maxiem eating sumthing frm hagrid's beard.... remember.... it is a beetle and tht is rite .. πŸ˜ƒ πŸ˜ƒ
coolfire thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#5
yes, i was also dissappointed with the yule ball fight between ron-hermione .. they were supposed to fight in the common room but they were walking while fighting .. there was no eye contact... although emma acted well... rupert's face was hardly shown... the entire scene was badly shot... there wasn't any chemistry... (well there probably would have been if they were facing each other instead of walking!!) ....
of one, instead of showing more than necessary romance scenes between hagrid and madame maxime ... they could have focused on this very important scene....... just reading the book made me feel so much chemistry... but i agree that on-screen, lacks the ron-hermione vibe ....
sumaira.daud thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#6
In all cases, movies are always disappointing compared to the book. This is because the book goes into small detail, while the movie goes on just the top things. You can't cover so much in just one movie! Remember, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was the first long book JK Rowling wrote. The first three books were really short, so that's why they could cover most of the book. But since the fourth book is so long, you can't really blame them for not covering all of it. It's the longest Harry Potter movie to date, how much longer do you want to make it? I agree with punk princess, they should've just made two movies if they couldn't cover everything. But even if they did make two movies, I still don't think anyone would've been satisfied. Obviously they can't cover each and every detail. So give them a break.
j y o t i thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#7
ya mayb she could hav included dis stuff
but i still luved da movie 😊
Morgoth thumbnail
21st Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 19 years ago
#8
oh no! i really wished they had shot the R/Hr scene properly

i think mike newell must be a H/Hr shipper! πŸ˜†
blue rose thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: sumaira.daud

In all cases, movies are always disappointing compared to the book. This is because the book goes into small detail, while the movie goes on just the top things. You can't cover so much in just one movie! Remember, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was the first long book JK Rowling wrote. The first three books were really short, so that's why they could cover most of the book. But since the fourth book is so long, you can't really blame them for not covering all of it. It's the longest Harry Potter movie to date, how much longer do you want to make it? I agree with punk princess, they should've just made two movies if they couldn't cover everything. But even if they did make two movies, I still don't think anyone would've been satisfied. Obviously they can't cover each and every detail. So give them a break.

i agree with u!!

Nishani thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#10
Yep, as Sumaira has said, we can never compare a movie on which it is based on a book.....it will almost never tie up.....the movies are generally changed for dramatic purposes.

Just look at Lord of the Rings as a good example....I read the book and was hugely shocked when I saw the movies... but at the end of it all, it is made for viewership and not sequencing as in the book. We just have to deal with it!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".