Virat should exit .. is bappa helping P the child se$$al molester - Page 10

Oh my god.... .what is happening in this forum.fans can behave crazily for their fvrts.i understand that .But this level of assumptions and false propaganda upon something which is nowhere true.

Pakhi is wrong for every person on the planet .But she helped virat to adopt vinayak.she loved him with her ❤️. She was the one who looked beyond her insecurity and bring back Sai.it was her efforts that vinayak can walk freely.Agree it was Sai but she did her doctor duty at that time.

Till today she did nothing wrong with vinayak.

She was sleeping with her kid and here people are comparing all this with pedophile and sensual assault.

This much hatred where one cannot see the logic and fact that too for fiction is more worrisome than the entire cringe story of ghum.

Originally posted by: Life_Is_Dutiful

After watching Pakhi thanking Bappa I felt that she thinks Bappa is helping her to get rid of Sai but actually he is not. Bappa is just making her overconfident. On the other hand Sai comes to know of all the numerous problems Vinu is facing due to Pakhi. She has to take action to save Vinu.

BK is not happy for transfer and vinu know the truth of her mother so now BK ask sai to come to CN for vinu may be in the upcoming episode bk not like P and her decision

Originally posted by: Sinmegh

well then the makers should avoid showing these scenes ..
there is still time they should chop these scenes before broadcasting it on tv .. other wise I will send it for IBF complaint

I refuse to give the character Patralekha benefit of doubt ..
it happens in tv industry .. so it’s time to start pointing it out so that they cut down these bed scenes of child actors


In a singing reality show .. the judge papon had enthusiastically kissed a 12 year old contestant after her performance and he was called out for abuse .. I am not giving him a clean chit ..

And the shows are blatantly showing this much on tv .. why shouldn’t they be questioned

Exactly..her expressions weren't motherly..it conveyed lust. It's not because we hate patralekha..the actress failed to show any motherly love in her expressions or body language .

Check those screencaps..anyone would think along these lines seeing those expressions and the way she snuggled the boy. The director should've corrected her instead of being afraid that she's ML's wife and PH's relative.

Not saying she made the child actor uncomfortable, but on screen , we can't help but suspect Patralekha the character's real intentions due to the actress's botched portrayal and emoting in the scene.

The character Patralekha is an established lunatic who lusted for her brother in law the entire time she was married , then successfully managed to break the said brother in law's marriage and post leap all she cared about was to bed virat (so many dialogues were given to show these intentions post leap). And she has been unsuccessful . And she has been shown extremely frustrated about that.

And Vinayak is not her son..she has no blood relation with the boy, she was hardly affected by his supposed death. Unlike his biological parents Sai and Virat who were grieving for years.

If the makers do not want the audience to think along these lines..either replace the actress who plays patralekha with a competent one who can emote or send the current one to an acting school.

Originally posted by: Jyrubina

BK is not happy for transfer and vinu know the truth of her mother so now BK ask sai to come to CN for vinu may be in the upcoming episode bk not like P and her decision

Yes and she threw stone on Vinayak s sweater. Didn't even bother to see the kids sweater.

Originally posted by: Rosyme

Yes and she threw stone on Vinayak s sweater. Didn't even bother to see the kids sweater.

She was never attached to the baby when it was in her womb..the baby was only a means to possess virat and break Virat-Sai marriage. And sadly she succeeded.

This sudden overflowing of love for Vinu is also to cement her position in CN and Virat's life , otherwise before when she was obsessed about having her own child and planning multiple honeymoons, She hardly cared for him.

Originally posted by: ratna.nanda

She was never attached to the baby when it was in her womb..the baby was only a means to possess virat and break Virat-Sai marriage. And sadly she succeeded.

This sudden overflowing of love for Vinu is also to cement her position in CN and Virat's life , otherwise before when she was obsessed about having her own child and planning multiple honeymoons, She hardly cared for him.

Yes true. She got Sai to heal Vinayak for pleasing Virat. Virat told her that they will go for honeymoon after Vinayak becomes all right, before he left for Kankavli.

She got Sai by guilt tripping her.

And once Sai s work was over and Vinayak got treated, she wanted Sai to go back.

She's not happy if Virat mingles with Savi or when Ashwini gifted a locket to Sai and Ninad gifted stuff to Savi.

And remember she tried to erase Sai s footprints when she entered CN.

Now she's going to manipulate Savi once she enters CN.

that scene certainly looked tacky and $$$ to some extent ..i guess its because of the actress playing ..more importantly she cant bring out the motherly warmth ..therefore it came out so $$$...top it all her silky transparent nighty made the scene look so $$$..Unfortunately because of the direction and the actress the actual intention was not delivered to the audience as it should be..It had nothing to do with sexual abuse or any sort...

Originally posted by: ratna.nanda

Exactly..her expressions weren't motherly..it conveyed lust. It's not because we hate patralekha..the actress failed to show any motherly love in her expressions or body language .

Check those screencaps..anyone would think along these lines seeing those expressions and the way she snuggled the boy. The director should've corrected her instead of being afraid that she's ML's wife and has PH's relative.

Not saying she made the child actor uncomfortable, but on screen , we can't help but suspect Patralekha the character's real intentions due to the actress's botched portrayal and emoting in the scene.

The character Patralekha is an established lunatic who lusted for her brother in law the entire time she was married , then successfully managed to break the said brother in law's marriage and post leap all she cared about was to bed virat (so many dialogues were given to show these intentions post leap). And she has been unsuccessful . And she has been shown extremely frustrated about that.

And Vinayak is not her son..she has no blood relation with the boy, she was hardly affected by his supposed death. Unlike his biological parents Sai and Virat who were grieving for years.

If the makers do not want the audience to think along these lines..either replace the actress who plays patralekha with a competent one who can emote or send the current one to an acting school.

or simply cut down these scenes .. why show so much . It’s building grounds for doubt .. because mamta toh nahi lag raha hai ..,why is Vinayak suddenly so attached to patralekha.. this was clearly not the case post leap