Why has IF not confirmed Patru’s “the not so pregnant drama”??

1232308 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#1


[HIDDEN CONTENT]
The content of this post has been Hidden by User.

Created

Last reply

Replies

22

Views

1.9k

Users

7

Likes

67

Frequent Posters

Rosyme thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#2

Originally posted by: Elska18

IF has not confirmed in their so called paid articles!! Kuch toh jhol jhaal is going on.. do din same pre-cap dikha rahe hai channel wale!! It’s a trap only.. later on they’ll show that Patru/Sai was dreaming the worst case scenario for both!!

Yes they would have shot 2 scenes before that doc dying scene. Depending on this week's trp they will play one of them.

This week they will know for sure if audience liked surrogacy or not.

This JM is filler n between.

Moor278 thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 3 years ago
#3

What if.. they had indeed planned for surrogacy but had to play this bouncer because of the IBF complaint???

That's why they don't have a written track and neither can anyone confirm!!!

Hospital hostage drama daalke buying time to sort this out.


My point is... V is a lead character... P is a negative 'lead'...


If need be, they can further deteriorate her character and frankly the audience won't mind that.

But V ko idiotic aur negative banana bhari padta hai. Pad chuka hai... Even if they don't respond to the complaint (which they haven't btw... I have no response from SP) they will have to twist the story to favour V rather than P.


Isliye they made it seem like a false implantation. V is easily safe now. There's no surrogacy, so his blunder is washed away.

P ki doc is dead, so she can keep up the pretence still.


I was chatting with another complainant the other day and said the same thing to her...

That SP might not respond directly.. they will tweak something and then they will say ki 'humne to ye plan Kiya tha.. you reacted early'

1232308 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: Moor278

What if.. they had indeed planned for surrogacy but had to play this bouncer because of the IBF complaint???

That's why they don't have a written track and neither can anyone confirm!!!

Hospital hostage drama daalke buying time to sort this out.


My point is... V is a lead character... P is a negative 'lead'...


If need be, they can further deteriorate her character and frankly the audience won't mind that.

But V ko idiotic aur negative banana bhari padta hai. Pad chuka hai... Even if they don't respond to the complaint (which they haven't btw... I have no response from SP) they will have to twist the story to favour V rather than P.


Isliye they made it seem like a false implantation. V is easily safe now. There's no surrogacy, so his blunder is washed away.

P ki doc is dead, so she can keep up the pretence still.


I was chatting with another complainant the other day and said the same thing to her...

That SP might not respond directly.. they will tweak something and then they will say ki 'humne to ye plan Kiya tha.. you reacted early'


Star plus reversed the story to glorify V is not what the audience wants...the main issue is how they showed surrogacy... Ya toh pura hatao.. show ki it was Pakhi's dream.. i still want people to complaint against the shit broadcast...!!! Now they're giving disclaimer pe disclaimer on scenes as well!!! What I think is that even this failed implantation is a dream . And they'll continue with surrogacy...

Moor278 thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 3 years ago
#5

Pura to vo hatane se rahe.. itna to arrogance hai unke pass...

Maine vahi bola parso.. agar abhi advance episodes hote to they could have recalled the episode. Ab telecast ke baad they will have to stand by it. By hook or crook.


I am not saying it negates what V did to Sai. Absolutely not. I am just waiting for their reply (if they do at all)... I have 15 days to respond again 🤣.


But then again, they might just ignore and pretend ki because there is no surrogacy now, they don't have to reply back. 🙄


P.S. please aisa mat bolo ki implantation dream hai... I so want it to be true 😭. Ye jo thodi si ummeed jagi hai vo bhi khatam ho jayegi 💔

1232308 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: Moor278

Pura to vo hatane se rahe.. itna to arrogance hai unke pass...

Maine vahi bola parso.. agar abhi advance episodes hote to they could have recalled the episode. Ab telecast ke baad they will have to stand by it. By hook or crook.


I am not saying it negates what V did to Sai. Absolutely not. I am just waiting for their reply (if they do at all)... I have 15 days to respond again 🤣.


But then again, they might just ignore and pretend ki because there is no surrogacy now, they don't have to reply back. 🙄


P.S. please aisa mat bolo ki implantation dream hai... I so want it to be true 😭. Ye jo thodi si ummeed jagi hai vo bhi khatam ho jayegi 💔



They can pretend in their oblivious world, but they did show it right.. it was broadcasted.. agar kal ko they say it was a dream toh bhi their are proofs everywhere from Sandeep confirming the track.. to sbs segments and all the articles... How it was initiated by that cowrie episode... Hum bhi Chu nahi hai..😑😑😑😑

1232308 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#7

Surrogacy hata diya is not inversely proportional to what they showed to the audience in their idiocy 😑😑😑 Aisa nhi chalta .

Moor278 thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 3 years ago
#8

Are I completely agree... But isiliye this can be the salvaging ... P as surrogate mother se hi galat hai aage ka sab kuch. Geeta was absolutely fine. There's no issue in that.


Technically they should issue an apology and clarification ki ye sab galat hai. Atleast come clean and accept that we committed a blunder. But utna sense bhi nahi hai inke pass.


Isliye i am waiting for their official response. That will tell me.


Koi PIL file karega to to inko jawab dena hi padega. I dotn know IBF ko respond karna kitna compulsory hai. They might just ignore.

Shaome thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 3 years ago
#9

I'm pretty sure they are continuing with Surrogacy, they are just trying to lure back audience and also buying times to which track to go to..

If it's a dream it will fall flat on their faces...

The main focus is now virat's dilemma between love Vs baccha bhabi ..he will save baccha wala because his sperm inside her.. 🤢

And let Sai go.. This is how their misunderstanding start brewing, which will lead to separation..

Koi false implantation nehi..

nutmeg7 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#10

The fact that the procedure happened with Patralekha is illegal in itself. So now damage control ke liye it will be better if fake pregnancy is shown. Hopefully it should not be a dream sequence.

Related Topics

Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin Thumbnail

Posted by: Partyc

4 months ago

Glad to see Savi in an original storyline and not a rehash of YHM

When writers decided to copy YHM, I left watching the show and came back to see Savi's happy ending which may end in tragedy now. I never liked...

Expand ▼
Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin Thumbnail

Posted by: ThaneOfElsinore

4 months ago

Why do ITV audiences like toxicity and aggressive MLs?

This is actually in response to a reply on my post on the new season EDT#5 by missFiesty_69. We both wondered what made the non-toxic Neil's...

Expand ▼
Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin Thumbnail

Posted by: Randomlurker

5 months ago

Stop Calling Neil a Green Flag – He’s Not 😔🥲 Stop Calling Neil a Green Flag – He’s Not 😔🥲

Okay so this is my post and honestly, I agree with what many are saying. [ This is just my take. If this post spoils your mood or you don’t vibe...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".