Something that has been on my mind for the past few days and wanted to know more about this. Since the people on the forum are my only connect to this industry, I would like to know from writers and forum members more about this.
So, first off I want to know the process of film making as a broader term.
Like who gives the basic outline and who writes the actual dialogues..
Then I assume it is the director/cinematographers job to visually translate the writing.
And finally the actors to emote it.
The visual part I understand owing to my education, I wanted to know how this conversion of written text to screen happens.
If anyone is interested, I can explain briefly how the principles of design are used in framing of the shot, colour schemes and positioning.
So, the acting/emoting is the last stage and how the scene is received depends a lot upon on all the previous factors rather than just actors. Of course, good actors elevate script like anything and bad actors fail at nicely written plot but that's another discussion.
And I understand that although film making is a larger term, the approach to a film, limited series and daily soap would differ significantly.
The reason I wanted to know this, is a pattern I noticed in Ghum in past few days and I wanted to get an opinion if is it only me who felt so? Or even if isn't what do you guys think?
The pacing of the episode is being done in such a manner that only few characters and a particular issue is highlighted in a single episode.
For example, V manaofying episodes were dedicated only to SaiRat with no CN drama.
Later, proposal day 1 was Sai, day 2 was V, day 3 was BK, day 4 was Sairat and today was Pakhi.
Is it intentional?
While how the episode lands with me depends on what I feel about the character in focus or the way it was delivered, but to me personally I felt that this is working better rather than a mish mash of all characters getting some few seconds of screen time.
Like BK wala episode gave a wonderful insight into her character to me.. Had it been spread across several episodes, the effect may have been lost. I dont like BK much, but why I dont like became clear in that particular episode. As in the all at once diatribe by her helped me understand her better.
Secondly, without getting into the content of the story (toxicity aside), does this work better to focus on one character/one aspect instead of making a khichdi? As in they can only fit so much in a 20 min episode... and here's where it differs from a film.
Also, in a daily soap there has to be a potential drama everyday otherwise it would be boring... and here it differs from a limited series.
So is it better for the character and his/her feelings/emotions are better put out?
Again, as example... V-Sai had a significant ILU moment today and conversation with ShiviRaj but the overbearing feeling that has stayed with me is Pakhi ka outburst and Sammy ka hurt.
Is it just me who is reading all this?
We crib about bad camera angles, sloppy writing and missed opportunities but then who takes a call on all this?
And how does the translation of words to the screen happens?
What is the process?
Another reason I am asking this is, many of us including myself get worked up on some of the aspects that we dont like but probably in the long run and viewed in entirety... it feels different. So, if something like this is intentional, it would be better for my sanity to not pay much attention to the character in focus in that particular episode.
Visually and aesthetically I see a lot of change... the treatment is different... I can explain in detail to anyone who wants to know. There are few scenes and few frames that have stayed in my mind.
There have been increasing instances of parallels being drawn to previous episodes and they are not the obvious ones through flashbacks.
Please feel free to respond, but I want it to be honest and not a comment on acting abilities or personal equations or the content or the story.
It is more of how that story is represented!!!
65